Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for meinungsvielfalt.jetzt

Channel

meinungsvielfalt.jetzt

@meinungsvielfalt_jetzt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

182subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001729656134
TypeChannel
Username@meinungsvielfalt_jetzt
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 6 May 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/meinungsvielfalt_jetzt

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1821841838 August 2026 — 184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 184 subscribers8 September 2026 — 182 subscribers8 August 20268 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 31 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 182–184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 06:55182-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:31184no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:29184first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 38s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2022 to 13 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Apr 2024, 13:25 UTC227 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @NDS_Hinweise

⁠„Manifest“: Kein Interesse an den Kritikern von DLF, ARD und ZDF ➠ Lesen / anhören #Podcast @NachDenkSeiten

13 Apr 2024, 13:25 UTC260 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @NDS_Hinweise

Meinungsvielfalt.jetzt: ÖRR-Mitarbeiter wollen den Rundfunk reformieren | Annekatrin Mücke ➠ Hier anschauen NachDenkSeiten-#Hinweis

👏1

13 Apr 2024, 13:24 UTC177 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @jasminkosubekVideo

Diese Woche wurde ein Manifest zur Reform des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks veröffentlicht. Mitarbeiter des Apparats fordern u.a. ein Mitspracherecht der Beitragszahler und die Umsetzung des Programmauftrags. Außerdem wurde ein Petition ins Leben gerufen. Vielleicht will der ein oder andere mitmachen. Die Hoffnung stirbt schließlich zuletzt. ✍🏼https://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/erneuerung-des-oeffentlich…

13 Apr 2024, 13:24 UTC189 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @jasminkosubekVideo

Ist der öffentlich-rechtliche Rundfunk reformierbar? Oder könnte man die ÖRR-Programme einfach dem freien Markt aussetzen? Darüber spreche ich mit der Journalistin Annekatrin Mücke, die 25 Jahre Erfahrung im öffentlich-rechtlichen Fernseh- und Radiobetrieb hat. Sie ist eine der Unterzeichnerinnen des Manifests von Meinungsvielfalt.jetzt. Gefordert wird eine Reform des öffentliche-rechtlichen Rundfunks. Wir sprechen…

30 Sept 2022, 05:26 UTC763 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @UlrikeGuerot

Wer schweigt, stimmt zu. UlrikeGuerot.t.me 🗣

18 May 2022, 09:55 UTC≈1,270 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @apolut

Katrin Seibold: Aussteigen lohnt sich! 🎥 Drei (ehem.) Mitarbeiter aus dem öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunk im Gespräch “Wahrheit oder Pflicht”. Ole Skambraks, Martin Ruthenberg und Katrin Seib ..weiterlesen auf apolut.net #apoluTipp @apolut

👏1

9 May 2022, 06:23 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 8 August 2026

#Reaktion Wir müssen uns diesen Rundfunk zurückholen! PROF. DR. MICHAEL MEYEN: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Institut für Kommunikations­wissenschaft und Medien­forschung

8 May 2022, 18:11 UTC≈5,460 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Die Meinungsfreiheit ist essentiell für eine friedliche Gesellschaft. ➥ @meinungsvielfalt_jetzt!

👏3

7 May 2022, 16:05 UTC896 viewsread 8 August 2026

#Statement Ich war der absolute Hörfunk-Fan. ARD @meinungsvielfalt_jetzt

7 May 2022, 15:05 UTC631 viewsread 8 August 2026

#Statement Die Ausgewogenheit in ARD, ZDF und den Dritten habe ich schon vor 2020 zunehmend vermisst. ZDF @meinungsvielfalt_jetzt

7 May 2022, 14:05 UTC544 viewsread 8 August 2026

#Statement ‚Wahre Rechtgläubigkeit verlangt eine vollständige Kontrolle über die eigenen Denkvorgänge und eine unermüdliche Flexibilität in der Behandlung von Fakten.‘ ARD @meinungsvielfalt_jetzt

7 May 2022, 13:05 UTC481 viewsread 8 August 2026

#Statement Mein Arbeitgeber trägt massiv zur Spaltung unserer Gesellschaft bei. ARD @meinungsvielfalt_jetzt

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @meinungsvielfalt_jetzt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“meinungsvielfalt.jetzt” (@meinungsvielfalt_jetzt), 182 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meinungsvielfalt_jetzt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.