Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

обезяна на коде

@megacodder

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003538240631
TypeChannel
Username@megacodder
Descriptionобезяна кушает бананчик
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 23 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/megacodder

Growth

277 August 2026 — 27 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:0127no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:1727first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
107.4%
avg views ÷ 27 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026
Posts held20 (23 May 202618 July 2026)
Views total29
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁538.5%
🔥323.1%
👍215.4%
🤣215.4%
17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC29 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Можете меня поздравить, гугл соизволил наконец-то дать мне разрешение. В краце, домена .xyz очень долго синькаются (я месяц назад подал +-) К сожалению, сейчас катострафически мало времени уделяю проекту, потому что взял большой заказ на разработку и сейчас фулл тайм делаю его sparkyaibot.xyz отныне с зеленой кнопкой

1

23 Jun 2026, 15:16 UTC57 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Читал статью где говорится что китайские модели отстают примерно на 3-6 месяцев по качеству, но по бенчам вчера смотрел что китайцы все на пару % отстаю от опуса последнего. Спасибо китайцам что не дают пендосам втридорога продавать токены. Если вы юзаете опенклавы и не делаете оркестрацию, то вы сильно переплачиваете. Мифис единственная модель которая на пару поколений впереди, но это пока.

23 Jun 2026, 15:09 UTC49 viewsread 11 August 2026

🤥 ByteDance представила Seedance 2.5 и Doubao 2.1 Pro Doubao 2.1 Pro – новая языковая модель. Компания заявляет, что она превосходит Claude Opus 4.6 в задачах по написанию кода и работе агентов, при этом обходится на 80% дешевле. Seedance 2.5 – обновлённая модель для генерации видео, выйдет в июле. Главное улучшение – теперь она создаёт видео длиной до 30 секунд за один запрос, тогда как раньше приходилось склеиват

13 Jun 2026, 15:28 UTC61 viewsread 11 August 2026

Есть два кодика на бесплатную неделю клауда про, если кому надо - пишите Вам нужно привязать вашу карточку (ру не подойдут, только виза/мк) Я через трию все оплачиваю, очень советую всем, особенно тем кто часто бывает за границей

13 Jun 2026, 08:10 UTC57 viewsread 11 August 2026

я предлагаю мистеру трампи заблочить аи каждый кто использовал аи, ICE едет за вами! на самом деле как же опен аи всеми средствами пытается перегнать антропик, даже самыми позорными, продвигая свои интересы в конгрессе вряд ли это поможет для тех кто не пользовался фаблом, забейте, это кастрированая херня без права воли и свободы, сильно умная но в цепях через год это будет посредственная модель по типу санета 4.5

12 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC48 viewsread 11 August 2026

polza.ai посмотрите насколько легкий кейс, просто перетянули опенроутер и сделали цены на % 30-40 больше потом создаете видос (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loZ6bv1VIHA) как у них "не получился ии проект" который по факту сделает любой первоклассник (перетянуть суно + любую ллмку выше второго поколения, написать логику = аидонаты) та дам, я предполагаю, что у них с видоса человек 700-1000 пришло просто посмотреть ч

10 Jun 2026, 08:22 UTC41 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вышла , только под названием Fable. Где новости о хаках центробанков пентагонов и тд? Вам не показалось что это все хуйня и лишь правильный маркетинг со стороны Антропик. Каждый их пердеж рынок переживает сверхкритически, когда они сказали что нашли уязвимости, хоть кто-то подтвердил это? Откуда блять эта информация пришла и почему сейчас ничего не ломается резко ? Как много вопросов и как мало ответов..

6 Jun 2026, 11:21 UTC42 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Недавно произошла утечка последней версии Mythos, и вместе с ней стали известны тарифы на использование. Китайский хакер получил несанкционированный доступ к неофициальному API и перепродавал этот доступ, но его обнаружили, и сейчас эта возможность уже заблокирована. Тогда стали известны цены за токены. Стоимость за токен оказалась более чем в три раза выше, чем у Opus 4.8... Похоже, релиз уже не за горами.

6 Jun 2026, 11:21 UTC42 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @leo_autotradingPhoto

얼마전 Mythos 의 최신 버전이 유출되어서 가격 정책들이 유출되었습니다 중국 해커가 비공식 api 권한을 탈취해서 이를 재판매하고 있다가 걸려서 지금은 막힌 상태인데요. 그때 나왔던 토큰 단가입니다. 무려 Opus4.8 보다 3배가 넘는 토큰당 단가네요... 슬슬 출시 직전인가봅니다

30 May 2026, 11:35 UTC56 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

вот сижу ботика сайтик пишу и мне в голову приходит постоянно отдна и та же мысль сколько таких же как я, которым развязали руки, посредством предоставления инструментов, сокращающих путь к продукту создается новая прослойка работяг которые будут пожинать плоды не упустите момент ! появления интернета - появление биткоина - появление ии

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @megacodder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 331,822 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“обезяна на коде” (@megacodder), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/megacodder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.