2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 229–231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 10:15
230
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:12
230
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 24 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
17
Videos
34
Links
4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 45s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
260 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
75
28.8%
🔥
57
21.9%
👍
35
13.5%
🥰
29
11.2%
🕊
12
4.62%
💯
8
3.08%
⚡
7
2.69%
💋
6
2.31%
❤🔥
5
1.92%
🏆
4
1.54%
👏
4
1.54%
🍓
3
1.15%
🐳
3
1.15%
👌
3
1.15%
😍
3
1.15%
🍾
2
0.769%
🎉
2
0.769%
🥱
2
0.769%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 260reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2023 to 6 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
на этом ребята, мне нужно покинуть вас…
Все те , кто помогал мне , был со мной без какой то выгоды , те кто были со мной с самого начала моего пути, когда и в мыслях не было того , чего мы щас добились каждому большое , огромное Спасибо❤️
Каждый кто проникся моей идеей смогут говорить за меня , как я могу говорить за них!
Я всегда буду рядом , смотреть за всем тем , что происходит с 1312 и людьми кто в нем
Я ухожу не…
СОВЕРШЕННО НОВЕНЬКИЙ UC SHOP🔥
Шикарные цены, никакого скама или задержек🫦
Сейчас проходит розыгрыш на UC💸
А также Акция, на дополнительные юсишки за почти туже цену⚡
бро, чего ты ждешь? Залетай к нам - @UC_BOOST
🔴основной состав 1312 ищет игры в режиме 4/4
Кто говорил за софт или верит в это , что мы лутали туры 2-2 4-4 давая фулл реки и резко все софт качнули и слили UWW “с софтом якобы” то соболезную вам
Что бы развеять эти сказки , готовы на фулл реки по тур правилам сыграть 4-4 с любым достойным составом / кланом / Хаусом
Если проиграем , то достойно примем поражение , а так все делается это ради развития этого режима …
OWN снова балуются фш резами на SPV состав (который как я и говорил Ни как к нам не относятся )
2:0 в пользу 1312 без шанса на бек , ведь вы очень слабые и смысл с вами играть , что бы опять ваш тип в катке отлетел ?
🔴в поиске ответственных и сильных игроков 4/4
Возможна зп, желательно пады с резами
Возможно под зарплату , все зависит от вашей игры (проверочные игры будут проводится с фулл реком, который вы мне скинете и я посмотрю как вы играете , так что с софтом скип сразу)
Тг для связи @saymoyfail
🔥4❤1
Signed 𝐦𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐧
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mefedronONEscamer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mefedronONEscamer named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@skinsoskiplz named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐦𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐧👁” (@mefedronONEscamer), 230 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mefedronONEscamer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
