7 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
MedicWeb Bloog
@medicweb_telegram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
222subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001348862241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @medicweb_telegram |
| Description | #Promoción en #Salud y temas de #Tecnologías #Médicas @galenoschat @medicweb_telegram @drgalenorg @pmedis Apps Grátis También entren al chat con diferentes temas y foros. Popcast. https://t.me/medicwebchat https://medicwebdotblog.wordpress.com |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/medicweb_telegram |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 222 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 222 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.73%
- avg views ÷ 222 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3.8
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 73 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 601
- Videos
- 30
- Links
- 508
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
7 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
7 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Aquí tienes la visual del Horizonte MedicWeb 5.0 lista:https://copilot.microsoft.com/th/id/BCO.5647d988-5b63-4538-a15f-de05f05d730a.png📘 Elementos clave del Horizonte MedicWeb 5.0Evidencia → niveles científicos rigurosos, jerarquía metodológica.Filtro epistemológico → detección de sesgos y depuración de datos.Trazabilidad → registro verificable de fuentes y continuidad académica.Ética digital → cumplimiento normativo…
6 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
A continuación, presento la calificación de las fuentes de información utilizadas en esta investigación, clasificadas según los niveles de evidencia de Oxford (OCEBM 2011) y el Sistema GRADE, que evalúan la solidez metodológica de los estudios. Se incluyen enlaces verificables a cada fuente. --- 📊 CALIFICACIÓN DE FUENTES POR NIVEL DE EVIDENCIA Nivel Descripción Fuentes Identificadas 1 Revisiones sistemáticas de RC…
6 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC5 viewsread 7 August 2026
🧠 VALORACIÓN METODOLÓGICA (DeepSeek) El 67% de las fuentes utilizadas corresponden a los niveles más altos de evidencia (1-3), lo que otorga una base metodológicamente sólida a la investigación. La inclusión de guías de organismos internacionales (OMS, AAP) y estudios longitudinales de alta calidad (PATH, ABCD) permite establecer asociaciones con control de confusores y temporalidad. Las fuentes de nivel 4-6 complem…
6 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
Basado en la evidencia científica más reciente (2024-2026), estos son los resultados finales validados de la Fase 3 para tu investigación sobre vapeo en adolescentes de 16 años, bajo el marco MedicWeb IA 5.0. --- 1. DEPENDENCIA NICOTÍNICA (EVIDENCIA CONSOLIDADA) La exposición a nicotina durante la adolescencia genera dependencia de forma rápida y con características específicas: Hallazgo Dato Clave Fuente Nivel d…
6 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
5. SALUD MENTAL (EVIDENCIA EN EMERGENCIA) Un hallazgo relevante que emerge en la literatura más reciente es la asociación entre vapeo y salud mental: Hallazgo Dato Clave Fuente Depresión El vapeo y el consumo de cigarrillos en jóvenes se asocian con síntomas de depresión CDC Espectro de problemas Asociación con depresión, ansiedad, y riesgos severos como conducta suicida Systematic Review, 2026 Conductas de riesgo …
6 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
MEDICWEB IA 5.0 FASE 2 — SÍNTESIS Y ESTRUCTURACIÓN Vapeo en adolescentes de 16 años --- 1. Título del protocolo Vapeo durante la adolescencia: dependencia nicotínica, efectos respiratorios, desarrollo neurológico y transición al tabaquismo convencional. Diseño propuesto: estudio longitudinal, prospectivo y multicéntrico. Población objetivo: adolescentes de 16 años. --- 2. Problema de investigación El uso de…
6 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
Dominio| Variable| Medición propuesta Exposición| Vapeo| Nunca / experimental / ocasional / frecuente / diario Intensidad| Frecuencia| Episodios por día/semana Duración| Tiempo de exposición| Meses/años Nicotina| Dependencia| Craving, tolerancia, abstinencia, dificultad para abandonar Respiratorio| Síntomas| Tos, disnea, sibilancias, irritación Neurológico| Función cognitiva| Atención, memoria de trabajo, control inh…
6 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
La existencia de una asociación estadística no elimina por sí misma estos factores. --- 11. Estructura longitudinal propuesta T0 — Basal Adolescentes de 16 años. Registrar: - historial de vapeo; - nicotina; - tabaquismo; - síntomas respiratorios; - variables neurocognitivas; - factores psicosociales; - policonsumo; - antecedentes familiares. T1 — Seguimiento Evaluar: - persistencia del vapeo; - dependencia; …
6 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
Sí. Para que la Fase 2 de MedicWeb IA 5.0 tenga trazabilidad académica, conviene sustituir las referencias genéricas por una bibliografía verificable y, además, corregir algunas afirmaciones que estaban formuladas con demasiada certeza. He revisado fuentes primarias y organismos sanitarios, priorizando PubMed, CDC y OMS, e incorporando evidencia de 2025–2026 cuando está disponible. Bibliografía verificable de la Fa…
6 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
5. Daño respiratorio y EVALI Umbrella review 2025 Golder S, Hartwell G, Barnett LM, Nash SG, Petticrew M, Glover RE. Vaping and harm in young people: Umbrella review. Tobacco Control. 2025. DOI: 10.1136/tc-2024-059219. Esta revisión es particularmente útil porque reunió 56 revisiones derivadas de 384 artículos. Entre sus hallazgos: asociación consistente con inicio posterior del tabaquismo; asma como resultado …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @medicweb_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 944,585 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MedicWeb Bloog” (@medicweb_telegram), 222 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medicweb_telegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.