Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MÉDICOS POR LA VERDAD España (Oficial)

Channel

MÉDICOS POR LA VERDAD España (Oficial)

@medicosporlaverdadESP

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,790subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559556283
TypeChannel
Username@medicosporlaverdadESP
DescriptionDifusión de información científica y médica de Médicos por la Verdad España
Created28 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/medicosporlaverdadESP

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,79012,84612,8186 August 2026 — 12,801 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,806 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,808 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,803 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,806 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,803 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,795 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,793 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,802 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,800 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,796 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,797 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,793 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,794 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,804 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,805 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,801 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,799 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,803 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,798 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,796 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,800 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,805 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,809 subscribers6 September 2026 — 12,803 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,820 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,817 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,810 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,809 subscribers17 September 2026 — 12,813 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,808 subscribers26 September 2026 — 12,821 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,839 subscribers9 October 2026 — 12,846 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,843 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,837 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,832 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,833 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,830 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,829 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,826 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,821 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,818 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,817 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,813 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,809 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,812 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,810 subscribers31 October 2026 — 12,812 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,808 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,805 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,801 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,796 subscribers7 November 2026 — 12,798 subscribers8 November 2026 — 12,793 subscribers10 November 2026 — 12,790 subscribers6 August 202610 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 96 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,782–12,854 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 02:5412,790-3
8 Nov 2026, 16:5612,793-5
7 Nov 2026, 09:1812,798+2
6 Nov 2026, 10:4812,796-5
5 Nov 2026, 14:1112,801-4
3 Nov 2026, 17:5112,805-3
1 Nov 2026, 21:4612,808-4
31 Oct 2026, 19:2912,812+2
30 Oct 2026, 20:2812,810-2
29 Oct 2026, 00:3812,812+3
28 Oct 2026, 02:4812,809-4
26 Oct 2026, 23:4612,813-4
25 Oct 2026, 20:4712,817-1
24 Oct 2026, 18:0612,818-3
23 Oct 2026, 19:3512,821-5
22 Oct 2026, 22:5412,826-3
21 Oct 2026, 19:5612,829-1
18 Oct 2026, 16:4612,830-3
17 Oct 2026, 18:4012,833+1
16 Oct 2026, 16:2712,832first reading

Engagement

104 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 12,790 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,890
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 104 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held104 (23 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total35,840
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 07:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
214
Videos
73
Links
450

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
48m 44s
Average length
4m 04s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 23:01 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @silvanobg_elartedevivirPhoto

ENTREVISTA EN ESRADIO BALEARES: Aprovechando mi estancia en Mallorca, fui invitado a una entrevista en el programa «Despertar de la Consciencia», a cargo de Marilena Estarellas. …

3 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @DraNataliaPrego

Plataforma de ARNm: ¿No altera el ADN? Cuando dicen que no altera el ADN, esa afirmación ignora la bioquímica básica del genoma. Fuera de la vacunología, el riesgo genotóxico está más que demostrado y vigilado en terapias antitumorales o antivirales. ¿Por qué con la plataforma de ARNm se han aplicado dogmas de los años 70? Si una terapia génica convencional o un fármaco oncológico altera el genoma o activa retro…

1 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @DraNataliaPregoPhoto

Las nanopartículas lipídicas en las "vacunas covid" no se quedan en el brazo. Su tamaño les permite viajar por la sangre activando la inflamación: en pulmones y bazo provocan rupturas en el ADN; en el torrente sanguíneo dañan los glóbulos rojos (hemólisis) y activan coágulos (trombosis). En nanotoxicología, el tamaño sí importa. Cuanto más pequeña es una partícula, más tóxica es para la célula. Las nanopartículas …

30 Oct 2026, 21:31 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @silvanobg_elartedevivirPhoto

TRANSACTIVISMO EN USURBIL: El día 10 de octubre tuve la oportunidad de exponer la realidad que veo sobre la transexualidad. Cuelgo aquí la grabación de la presentación en Usurbil en la compañía de mi amigo y gran persona Joseba Ar…

27 Oct 2026, 00:02 UTC≈2,410 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @DraNataliaPrego

¿Por qué las grandes farmacéuticas prefieren quimioterapias patentadas de 10.000 € que pueden destruir el organismo, mientras ocultan compuestos de bajo coste? El fenbendazol ataca la beta-tubulina tumoral, provocando un colapso molecular masivo y un bloqueo irreversible en el punto de control de la fase de crecimiento (G2/M). En G2, la célula realiza un estricto control de calidad, comprobando que el ADN no tenga e…

24 Oct 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,270 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @silvanobg_elartedevivirPhoto

PRESENTACIÓN EN USURBIL - COVID Y VACUNAS: El día 9 de octubre tuve la ocasión de participar, junto a mi amigo y gran persona Joseba Argintxona Gondra, en la presentación sobre «Covid y sus "vacunas", el elefante en la habitación, la omertá vasca». …

24 Oct 2026, 11:26 UTC≈1,930 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @medicosporlaverdadarPhoto

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muWILJ9iQlc Padres con criterio: vacunas, la verdadera historia - Dr. Oscar Botta Charla del Dr. Oscar Botta, pediatra, presentada el domingo 11 de octubre en el 3.er Congreso BioHealing, en Mendoza. Una exposición en la que compartió su mirada sobre la historia de las vacunas y el papel de los padres en las decisiones sobre la salud de sus hijos.

24 Oct 2026, 03:43 UTC≈1,970 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @DraNataliaPrego

Piensa en el caso de Robert F. Kennedy Jr. y su lucha contra la disfonía espasmódica. Este tema vuelve a poner sobre la mesa el debate sobre la transparencia de las farmacéuticas y cómo se manejan realmente los efectos secundarios de las vacunas. El gran problema es que, demasiadas veces, el sistema de salud tiende a minimizar el dolor de los pacientes. Etiquetan lo que les pasa como "causa desconocida" o "idiopática…

23 Oct 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @DraNataliaPrego

Un grupo de ciudadanos neerlandeses ha iniciado un histórico juicio civil en Leeuwarden contra figuras clave de la gestión pandémica, incluyendo a Bill Gates, Mark Rutte y representantes de Pfizer, por presuntos daños causados por las “vacunas” de ARNm. Los demandantes alegan que fueron engañados sobre la seguridad y eficacia de las inyecciones, argumentando la ausencia de verdadero consentimiento informado y denunc…

22 Oct 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @akashacomunidad

A pesar de haber sido una invención americana, la irrradiación de la sangre con fines terapéuticos fue retomada por los rusos y otros países de Europa oriental. Mucho de lo que sabemos ahora viene de ellos. A mí, la verdad me parece impresionante y bellísimo. La sanación mediante fotones, esas partículas elementales que acarrean energía electromagnética. Si quieren leer más sobre esto, les recomiendo la revisión qu…

22 Oct 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @akashacomunidad

#Lo_que_nos_da_el_sol 221026 Parte 1/3 Estimados miembros de Akasha Comunidad: El sol es central para la vida. Parece una frase superflua, pero en realidad no lo es. Nos ancla por medio de la gravedad que ejerce su masa a un órbita determinada en el espacio y es la principal fuente de energía para el planeta y quienes lo habitamos, con ondas de radiación que nos dan luz y calor. Esto a su vez es el factor más impo…

22 Oct 2026, 20:59 UTC≈1,340 viewsread 10 November 2026
Forwarded from @akashacomunidad

#Lo_que_nos_da_el_sol 221026 2/3 (Parte 1/3 en https://t.me/akashacomunidad/4402) La pregunta central, razonable, sobre al éxito de la terapia con luz UV fue, "¿Pero, por qué la radiación UV cura de diversas enfermedades?". Emmett Knott, un científico estadounidense propuso que el efecto se debía a que la sangre que circulaba en los capilares (vasos sanguíneos muy delgaditos) en la piel estaba siendo irradiada (pene…

Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @medicosporlaverdadESP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @medicosporlaverdadESP as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Natalia Prego Cancelo MD, Dra, oficial Canal de difusión
@DraNataliaPrego · 24,386
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Movimiento Asistencia Integral
@movimiento_asistencia_integral · 28,076
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
dra_olaya_oficial
@dra_olaya_oficial · 20,070
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
LIBERUM ASOCIACION
@liberumasociscion · 37,636
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
EL AULLIDO CANAL Fernando López-Mirones
@elaullido · 43,170
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MÉDICOS POR LA VERDAD España (Oficial)” (@medicosporlaverdadESP), 12,790 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medicosporlaverdadESP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.