Курсы по веб-разработке: вёрстка, программирование, работа и комьюнити.
Наш секретный бот @HTMLAcademyKeksobot.
Вопросы по обучению @htmlacademy_sales
Ролики на YT https://www.youtube.com/@HTMLAcademyTV
Ролики на VK https://vkvideo.ru/@htmlacademy
Created
Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,649–9,660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 05:15
9,650
-4
9 Aug 2026, 05:03
9,654
-5
6 Aug 2026, 02:50
9,659
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:57
9,659
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.40%
avg views ÷ 9,650 subscribers
Avg views / post
908
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
17 (3 July 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
5,445
Reactions total
63
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,540
Videos
≈190
Links
≈3,480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
1m 48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
27
19.7%
custom 5434125994518665311
24
17.5%
👍
24
17.5%
❤
21
15.3%
❤🔥
20
14.6%
🤣
10
7.30%
⚡
6
4.38%
👏
5
3.65%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Флексы или флоаты
Для опытных разработчиков этот вопрос даже не встаёт. Выбор в пользу флоатов очевиден.
Но для фронтендеров-неофитов последних двух поколений были придуманы флексы. Этакое простое введение в системы раскладок (в общем-то такая же эрзац-система-раскладки, как и гриды). Главная цель флексов — не отпугнуть новичка на пути к вершине мастерства (флоатам). Так что не удивляйтесь их достаточно слабым возм…
Мифические измерения гридов
"Флексы одномерные, а гриды двумерные" (ага, а трансформации трёхмерные).
Никогда не понимал, что это значит. Признайтесь, у кого так же?
Я расшифровываю это так: в гридах есть явная двумерная адресация для элементов, а во флексах — нет. Грид-элементу можно сказать: "живи в 4 колонке 3 ряда". И он будет там жить, даже если в грид-контейнере он один-одинёшенек.
Двумерная адресация — эт…
Сегодня работодатель отвечает вживую: реально ли джуну войти во фронтенд, когда стартовый код пишет ИИ
Каждый, кто сейчас осваивает вёрстку и программирование, слышит одно: во фронтенд не пробиться, стартовые задачи забрал ИИ. Андагар 10 лет строит платформы для энергетики, банков и фармы — и всё равно берёт джунов, растит их под свои проекты. Сегодня в 12:00 (MSK) спросим у работодателя напрямую: чем новичок теперь…
Код, с которого начинают во фронтенде, всё чаще пишет ИИ. Зачем Андагар растит своих джунов с нуля?
23 июля в 12:00 (MSK) спросим об этом у самой компании в прямом эфире. Андагар 10 лет делает цифровые продукты и высоконагруженные платформы для крупного бизнеса: энергетика, банки, ритейл, фарма, логистика. TAdviser включил компанию сразу в три раздела карты цифровизации промышленности.
Спросим напрямую:
– Как выгл…
🆕 Мы пересобрали курс «Фронтенд на автопилоте: AI-агенты на практике». От старой версии почти ничего не осталось, и название стало честнее: «Разработка с AI-агентами: инженерный подход».
За новым названием стоит главный сдвиг на рынке: производство кода дешевеет. Агент выдаёт его за минуты. Дорого теперь другое. Точно поставить задачу и дать агенту контекст, продумать архитектуру, проверить за ним каждый шаг и собра…
Лего-гриды
Гриды бесят. Это самый сложный и муторный механизм раскладки, в котором есть дополнительная (по сравнению с флексами) виртуальная сущность — шаблоны.
Флексы намного проще и намного популярнее. Но, к сожалению, владеть нужно и гридам — слишком уж мощная технология.
И если разбираться с гридами неспеша, с помощью красивых кубиков лего, то они почти не бесят.
Играть в новый уровень про гриды
Сегодня скидка закрывается вместе с выходными. 60% на курс «Протоколы и сети: основы» по промокоду NET60 — до конца дня.
Понимание сетевых протоколов — один из навыков, которых не хватает мидл-фронтендерам: так показывает наша карта компетенций. Если откладывали курс — сегодня последняя возможность взять его со скидкой.
🔒 Записаться на курс
Большинство фронтендеров работают с сетью каждый день, но редко глубже, чем «отправил запрос — получил ответ». Почему ответ медленный, почему рвётся соединение, почему одни данные шифруются, а другие идут открытым текстом — это уже за пределами fetch().
За четыре раздела курса «Протоколы и сети: основы» вы разбираете путь данных — от нижних уровней сети до прикладных протоколов. В основе — модель OSI и стек TCP/IP. …
Продолжение мини-игры по CSS-фильтрам
Меняйте код, подбирая комбинации карточек, чтобы повторить образец. Чем меньше ходов — тем вы круче!
Можно играть даже на мобильном.
👉🏻 Играть здесь
Карусели, ленты сторис, постраничные слайдеры раньше означали JavaScript: обработчики касаний, подсчёт смещений, ручная докрутка. CSS Scroll Snap делает «прилипание» к слайдам силами самого браузера — двумя свойствами и без единой строки скрипта.
Работает во всех современных браузерах, а в старых лента листается как обычно. В статье — что это за свойства, пара приёмов для тонкой настройки и живая лента, которую можн…
Тёмная тема обычно удваивает CSS: пишете цвета для светлой, потом те же — для тёмной в @media. Функция light-dark() схлопывает это в одну строку: оба значения в одном объявлении, а браузер выбирает нужное по системной теме.
Уже работает во всех актуальных браузерах, а для старых достаточно обычного запасного цвета. В статье — как подключить (есть обязательный color-scheme, иначе не сработает) и чем функция выручает …
🔥9custom 54341259945186653111
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @htmlacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 30,670 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HTML Academy” (@htmlacademy), 9,650 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/htmlacademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
