Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Me and my mind🦋

Channel

Me and my mind🦋

@meandmymind82

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001931295481
TypeChannel
Username@meandmymind82
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/meandmymind82

Growth

353635.57 August 2026 — 35 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36 subscribers15 August 2026 — 35 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:4635-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:4636no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:5636+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:2635first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.2%
avg views ÷ 35 subscribers
Avg views / post
22.5
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held19 (19 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total427
Reactions total71
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

71 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6794.4%
💔34.23%
👍11.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC2 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ما با آمريکا پدرکشتگی داریم🇮🇷 (این عکس زیبا رو خودم گرفتم. ممنون از دوستان که شهر رو زیباتر میکنن. هم این قشنگه و هم عکس های زیاد اقا مجتبی عزیز) #رسانه

7 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC16 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

کارم به جایی رسیده میرم تو مغازه به فروشنده توضیح میدم کدوم پرونده ها رو بیاره یا پیشنهاد بده. ایشالا دانشگاهم از امیرکبیر تغییر کنه کمتر انقلاب برم کمتر پرونده حل میکنم. ایشالا🙃

3💔3

7 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

هم خون اولین پرونده میستری گیمز هست و مثل همه پرونده هاشون درجه یکه. حتما برین سراغش سطح:تقریبا سخت نظر من: ۱۰ از ۱۰ #پرونده

4

7 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

این اخرین پرونده ای هست که حل کردم. این جذابیت اش در اینه که مربوط به یک پرونده اطلاعاتی ایران در جنگ ۱۲ روزه است و به نطر میاد که واقعی باشه یا حداقل تا حد زیادی واقعی باشه. خیلی سخت نیست ولی اسون هم نمیشه گفت. من لذت بردم و پیشنهاد میدم چون خیلی هم از هر لحاظ با کیفیته. سطح:متوسط رو به بالا نظر من:۸ از ۱۰ #پرونده

4

7 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC16 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

این پرونده فکر کنم ۵ تا ۶ ساعت طول کشید. من پیشنهاد میکنم همه پرونده های قبل از این میستری گیمز یعنی هم خون، رولت روسی، شام اخر رو حل کنین بعد بیاید سراغش چون المان هایی از اونا رو میاره که جالبه. البته این یه پرونده جداست و لازم نیست قبلی ها رو حل کرده باشین تا بتونید این رو حل کنین. اولین پرونده ای هست که اشتباه شما جون انسان ها رو به خطر میندازه و این استرس و هیجان رو بالاتر میبره. سطح:سخت نظر من:۱۰ از ۱۰ #پرونده

4

7 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC15 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

این ژانر خیلی متفاوته و همین جذابش میکنه. سخت نیست. متوسطه ولی واقعا جالبه سطح:متوسط رو به آسان نظر من: ۷ از ۱۰ #پرونده

4

7 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC15 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

این خیلی سادس. من تو ۱۰ دقیقه حلش کردم ولی برای شروع خیلی خوبه. سطح:آسان نظر من: ۵ از ۱۰ #پرونده

4

7 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC15 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

این اولین پرونده ای بود که چندین روز براش وقت گذاشتم. سخت بود واقعا ولی جوابش یه جوری بود. من جواب های منطقی تری با توجه به مدارکی که داده بود پیدا میکردم. ولی خب اکیه. داستانش یه مقدار تلخ و شاید بشه گفت ترسناک هست اما ترسناک نه به شکل غول و جن بلکه به خاطر تلخی زیادی ماجرا. میدونید که چی میگم. سطح: سخت نظر من: ۶ از ۱۰ #پرونده

4

7 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC16 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

کلی از این پرونده ها اخیرا بازی کردم. ایشالا اگر بشه فردا براتون میزارم که اگر علاقه مندین برین بگیرین.

5

7 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC16 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

خوشحالم که بلاخره این بی خوابی کمکم کرد بتونم این متن رو بنویسم. چند تا عکس هم از این ۹ ماه فقط گذاشتم که خیلی خشک نباشه. من خیلی اهل عکس گرفتن یا گذاشتن نیستم. فکر کنم یکم مجدد دستم راه بیافته خیلی بیشتر دوست دارم درد و دل کنم و از جنگ بگم

8

7 Aug 2026, 01:27 UTC17 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

امتحانا خیلی وقته تموم شده ولی خب کار و بار زندگی همچنان سنگینه نمیدونم چه طور تونستم بعد شهادت رهبر که رسما مرده متحرک بودم خودم رو پیدا کنم و این همه کار انجام بدم. همچنین نمیدونم چه جوری قراره این متن رو بنویسم. هر سختی عجیب و غیرمنتظره و طاقت فرسا در این ۹ ماه اخیر تنها من رو به انتخاب مهم ترین فرد زندگیم نزدیک تر کرد. بعد از جنگ من دیگه انتخابم رو کرده بودم و میدونستم دیگه نمیخوام به خاطر جبر زمان و مکان اون حجم

9

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @meandmymind82. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Me and my mind🦋” (@meandmymind82), 35 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meandmymind82.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.