Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Максим Котов

@mdkotov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

177subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001623761558
TypeChannel
Username@mdkotov
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mdkotov

Growth

177178177.56 August 2026 — 178 subscribers8 August 2026 — 178 subscribers13 August 2026 — 177 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 177–178 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:38177-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:31178no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:46178first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.6%
avg views ÷ 177 subscribers
Avg views / post
56.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (28 April 20265 August 2026)
Views total168
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1550.0%
🔥1033.3%
👍516.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC23 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tsypkintherealone

#АправдаЛичто сейчас все чаще применяется концепция «рака как хронического заболевания», с которым можно жить долгие годы, постоянно контролируя его с помощью терапии? Да, это правда. Концепция «рака как хронического заболевания» —заключается в том, что некоторые виды злокачественных опухолей можно длительно лечить и наблюдать, благодаря научным открытиям и разработке новых лекарственных препаратов - таргетной и имм

3

Signed Максим Котов

19 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC66 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sobaka_ruPhoto

Один врач отправляет на операцию, второй предлагает таблетки, а третий советует опять перепроверить диагноз — медицинский кастинг объявляется открытым! Но сколько мнений действительно нужно, чтобы вылечиться? Как не выбрать самого убедительного вместо самого компетентного? И в какой момент пора перестать коллекционировать заключения? Специально для Собака.ру разложил все по полочкам Максим Котов — онколог-хирург и

Signed Максим Котов

16 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC79 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Интервью Собаке про то, нужно ли второе мнение врача

1

Signed Максим Котов

4 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC107 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @MeetforcharityPhoto

Здоровье — это не только медицина, но и качество жизни, внутренний ресурс, научный подход и ежедневные привычки. В этой подборке — врачи, ученые и эксперты, которые развивают современное здравоохранение, помогают лучше понимать возможности организма, сохранять ментальный баланс и принимать решения, основанные на знаниях, а не мифах. Максим Котов — врач-онколог, кандидат медицинских наук. Дарья Курочкина — трансперс

Signed Максим Котов

29 Jun 2026, 19:07 UTC96 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tsypkintherealone

#АправдаЛичто онкологию теперь лечат «по генетическому паспорту» опухоли? Короткий ответ: да, и это уже используется сегодня. Однако не для всех типов опухолей существуют мутации ( или они пока не обнаружены), на которые мы можем повлиять. И не во всех ситуациях это нужно в настоящий момент. Ещё 20-30 лет назад врачи лечили рак преимущественно по морфологическому типу опухоли : рак лёгкого — одна схема, рак толстог

2

Signed Максим Котов

25 Jun 2026, 16:10 UTC103 viewsread 8 August 2026

Комментарий про обследования при онкологических заболеваниях

Signed Максим Котов

2 Jun 2026, 19:58 UTC147 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Интервью про сообщение диагноза в онкологии и ИИ-бот

3

Signed Максим Котов

25 May 2026, 09:06 UTC166 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vse_ne_naprasnoPhoto

⚡️Друзья, очень долгожданная для нас новость! Совместно с Яндексом мы создали «Не напрасно Бот» — специализированный ИИ-помощник для людей с онкозаболеваниями и их близких. ИИ-ассистент отвечает на сотни вопросов о раке. Он объясняет сложные медицинские термины простым человеческим языком, опираясь на более чем 1200 экспертных статей онлайн-энциклопедии «Онко Вики» и другие проверенные источники доказательной медици

👍41

Signed Максим Котов

18 May 2026, 09:23 UTC160 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tsypkintherealone

Важнейшая тема. Как врачам общаться с онкологическими пациентами. Я уже неоднократно говорил, что искусственный интеллект может даже диагноз поставить сегодня, а робот-хирург – удалить опухоль, но успех в битве с онкологическим заболеванием зависит в большой степени от эмоционального состояния пациента, а его создает врач. Создан ИИ-ассистент, помогающий онкологам эмоционально поддерживать пациентов. Рубрика #Хоро

4

Signed Максим Котов

14 May 2026, 10:18 UTC152 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня у меня День Рождения, мне исполняется 34 года. В этот день я хочу поддержать Фонд «Не напрасно» с которым моя жизнь связана уже 11 лет. 12 мая 2015 года завершился последний этап отбора в первый набор Высшей Школы Онкологии - образовательный проект, который занимается медицинским образованием онкологов и трансформацией онкологической помощи в России. В 2017 году я и еще 8 онкологов стали первыми выпускниками

🔥8👍1

Signed Максим Котов

28 Apr 2026, 17:36 UTC140 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vse_ne_naprasnoPhoto

В прошлую субботу, 26 апреля, в Москве прошел камерный благотворительный бранч «Отражение добра» в поддержку нашего фонда. «Отражение добра» задумывалось как альтернатива привычным благотворительным гала-ужинам. Здесь пожертвование не сводится к формальной сумме — каждый лот стал возможностью получить яркий личный опыт и одновременно поддержать важное дело. Среди них были: обед с единственным в мире четырехкратным

🔥21

Signed Максим Котов

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mdkotov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 214,744 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Максим Котов” (@mdkotov), 177 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mdkotov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.