Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for John McAfee 🇺🇸 News

Channel

John McAfee 🇺🇸 News

@mcafeenew

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

72subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004457356996
TypeChannel
Username@mcafeenew
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 21 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mcafeenew

Growth

6872706 August 2026 — 68 subscribers7 August 2026 — 71 subscribers9 August 2026 — 71 subscribers13 August 2026 — 72 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:0372+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:1571no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:0871+3
6 Aug 2026, 10:5568first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.4%
avg views ÷ 72 subscribers
Avg views / post
44.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total898
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥770.0%
220.0%
😁110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🚨NICK SHIRLEY EXPOSES THE JANUARY 6 UNSELECT COMMITTEE PAYOFFS — JAMIE RASKIN SENT “CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS” TO LIZ CHENEY AND ADAM KINZINGER! They weren’t patriots. They were paid. Citizen journalist Nick Shirley and his team just uncovered a paper trail from the January 6th Unselect Committee showing Congressman Jamie Raskin funneling “campaign contributions” straight to Republican traitors Liz Cheney and Adam Kin

🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC10 viewsread 9 August 2026

🚨ELON MUSK JUST DROPPED A $100 MILLION LAWSUIT ON KAMALA HARRIS AND THE DNC FOR ACCUSING HIM OF “BUYING, RIGGING, AND STEALING” THE 2024 ELECTION! The richest man on Earth is done taking their abuse. Elon Musk has officially filed a $100 million lawsuit against Kamala Harris and the Democratic National Committee for repeatedly claiming he “bought, rigged, and stole” the 2024 election. Musk made it clear he shouldn

6 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC20 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🚨New details in the Eric Swalwell sexual ass*ult case includes some disturbing reports about outgoing traitor Thomas Massie. "Massie and Swalwell were thick as thieves," said a source close to the investigation, "They spent an unnatural amount of time together while their wives were in their home states raising their kids." While no women have officially accused Massie, his reputation as a "player" was confirmed wh

4 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC44 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🚨ANTHONY FAUCI’S OWN FAMILY JUST ASKED HIM TO PLEASE NOT ATTEND THIS YEAR’S REUNION! Even the Faucis have had enough. Anthony Fauci’s family has formally requested that he stay home from this year’s reunion. The message came from Josephine Barron-Fauci herself: “There are hundreds of Faucis coming. Some of us lost people too.” The last scheduled reunion in 2021 was canceled because of the lockdowns he helped enfor

4 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🚨NICK SHIRLEY’S MINNESOTA MEDICAID FRAUD EVIDENCE IS GOING TO A FEDERAL GRAND JURY THIS WEEK — AND ILHAN OMAR IS SQUARELY IN THE CROSSHAIRS! The citizen journalist they tried to silence is about to take down a sitting congresswoman. Nick Shirley and his team spent weeks on the ground in Minnesota tracking leads and documenting the massive Medicaid fraud scheme. Their most explosive finding? Congresswoman Ilhan Omar

🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC38 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🚨ADAM SCHIFF DEFENDS HIS MULTIPLE TRIPS TO GREECE TO SEE “GOOD FRIEND” TOM HANKS: “NEITHER OF US HAVE DONE ANYTHING ILLEGAL!” Adam Schiff is now publicly insisting he shouldn’t have to explain his repeated trips to visit Tom Hanks in Greece because “neither of them have done anything illegal.”What does that actually mean? Hanks owns a private island sitting in a disputed economic zone between Greece and Turkey — a

😁1

3 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC76 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🚨ADAM SCHIFF DEFENDS HIS MULTIPLE TRIPS TO GREECE TO SEE “GOOD FRIEND” TOM HANKS: “NEITHER OF US HAVE DONE ANYTHING ILLEGAL!” Adam Schiff is now publicly insisting he shouldn’t have to explain his repeated trips to visit Tom Hanks in Greece because “neither of them have done anything illegal.”What does that actually mean? Hanks owns a private island sitting in a disputed economic zone between Greece and Turkey — a

2

3 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC72 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🚨FANI WILLIS’ AFFAIR WITH AL SHARPTON WILL COST THE EMBATTLED PROSECUTOR HER JOB! The walls have finally closed in. A state adjudicator has ruled that the Governor of Georgia can fire Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis for cause over her affair with Al Sharpton. The ruling states the relationship “caused irreparable harm to the legal system in Georgia.” Sharpton, for his part, claims he regrets the impact

🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC80 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🚨JEN PSAKI HAS BEEN SUBPOENAED TO TESTIFY ABOUT BIDEN’S MENTAL HEALTH AND HER KNOWLEDGE OF THE AUTOPEN — SHE’S ALREADY SAID SHE’LL PLEAD THE 5TH! The circle-back queen is finally getting circled back on. Jen Psaki has been officially subpoenaed to testify under oath about President Biden’s mental decline and exactly how much she knew about the illegal use of the autopen. Her response? She’s already signaled she wil

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mcafeenew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 771,605 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“John McAfee 🇺🇸 News” (@mcafeenew), 72 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mcafeenew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.