Channel
@mbugaychuk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
365subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002243051630 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mbugaychuk |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mbugaychuk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:39 | 365 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 367 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:20 | 369 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 369 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
116 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 63 | 54.3% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 36.2% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 6.90% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 2.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Мужской мир: реальность и иллюзии» Приглашаем мужчин в терапевтическую группу для исследования своей идентичности. Участие в нашей группе позволит вам глубже разобраться, как вы взаимодействуете с миром, какой вы в отношениях, в семье, в профессии. Это группа только для мужчин. Пространство, где мы будем открыто говорить о своих тревогах и проблемах, проявлять эмоции, получать поддержку. Мы будем исследовать: — Ка…
❤9🔥7
Дорогие подписчики, хочу поделиться анонсом своей мужской терапевтической группы. Важно отметить, что она открыта не только для тех, кто уже имеет опыт терапии, но и для мужчин, которые только хотят сделать первый шаг.
🔥2❤1
Кстати, последние несколько постов я писал без помощи ИИ, даже орфографию не проверял. А мне это не просто, с грамотностью у меня всегда были проблемы, да и письменно излагать свои мысли никогда не любил. Уверен грамотные люди это заметили ☺️. Чего-то надоела пластиковость ИИшных постов, даже если ты полностью свои мысли написал, а он просто слог причесал. А вы что думаете? Или я просто промты правильные не умею ис…
Sticker, posted without a caption
😭3
Минутка философствования. Когда делал коллаж с фото для предыдущего поста, я расстроился. По фото, на мой взгляд, прошлогоднее фото смотрится лучше. Но я то знаю, что оно не передает мои телесные ощущения. Сейчас чувствую себя намного комфортнее и увереннее, а тогда переодически ощущал себя как дрищ. И ракурс фото предполагает акцент только на прессе, а для пресса чем суше тем лучше, а то что все другие мышцы тоже …
🔥6❤5
Прошло 1,5 года с моего поста про сушку и рекордного минимального веса - вот он. После этого я смог скинуть еще пару кг до 78кг. А дальше стояла нетривиальная задача для меня - набрать вес, но постараться это сделать без сильного набора жировой массы. Разница между фотографиями +8-9 килограмм в 2026г. И вроде мне это удается и я этому очень рад. А если учитывать, что последний год один из самых сложных в моей жизни…
🔥30❤12👍8
Немного фото с нашего выступления на инвестиционной конференции «Ярмарка эмитентов».
🔥10❤1
Сегодня закончился 2-ой сезон нашей с Мариной авторской тематической психотерапевтической группы «Деньги и моя финансовая свобода». Группа получилась очень теплая и продуктивная. Несмотря на то, что она была тематическая «про деньги», нам удавалось проживать множество других важных процессов, напрямую не относящихся к теме группы. Вдохновлен. А уже в выходные планируем с Мариной обсуждать дальнейшее развитие группы…
❤14
File, posted without a caption
🔥7
Презентация с нашего выступления в прошедшую субботу на инвестиционной конференции «Ярмарка эмитентов 2026» (https://yarmarka.bondholders.ru)
🔥1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mbugaychuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 795,134 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Максим Бугайчук | Психология, инвестиции, жизнь…” (@mbugaychuk), 365 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbugaychuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.