Channel
@mbspscu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
383subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001136542930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mbspscu |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mbspscu |
Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 383 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 384 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 383 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 383 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
33 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 14 | 42.4% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 18.2% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 18.2% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 3.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧠 آیا ایایجی واقعاً میتواند استرس را از تلاش ذهنی تشخیص دهد؟ یکی از شاخصهای رایج برای شناسایی استرس با ایایجی، کاهش امواج آلفا و افزایش امواج بتا است. اما مجموعهای از پژوهشها نشان میدهد که این الگو لزوماً مختص استرس نیست. در مطالعهای از اِرهارت و همکاران (۲۰۲۲)، با افزایش تدریجی دشواری یک تکلیف شمارشی، عملکرد افراد از ۷۸٪ به ۳۴٪ کاهش یافت و استرس گزارششده افزایش پیدا کرد. با این حال، ایایجی تفاوت مشخصی م…
👍1
ایایجی میتواند تغییرات مرتبط با فشار ذهنی را نشان دهد، اما هنوز مشخص نیست که بتواند بهتنهایی «استرس» را از «تلاش ذهنی» تفکیک کند.
📌 آیا پژوهشهای روانشناسی ورزش از نظر حجم نمونه بهتر شدهاند؟🔍 خلاصه یک مقاله جدید (۲۰۲۶) یکی از مهمترین چالشهای پژوهشهای روانشناسی، استفاده از حجم نمونههای کوچک است؛ موضوعی که میتواند اعتبار نتایج را کاهش دهد. پژوهش جدیدی که در سال ۲۰۲۶ منتشر شده، بررسی کرده است که آیا این وضعیت در حوزه روانشناسی ورزش و فعالیت بدنی طی یک دهه اخیر بهبود یافته است یا خیر. مهمترین یافتهها 🔹 حجم نمونه در مطالعات همبستگی ح…
👌1
https://www.instagram.com/mbspscu/?g=5
https://sport.sbu.ac.ir/fa/w/news-sport-221?redirect=%2F
👏2
Photo, posted without a caption
فراخوان ارسال مقاله نشریه پژوهشهای روانشناختی در ورزش و سلامت Psychological Research in Sport and Health (PRSH) با صاحبامتیازی دانشگاه سمنان، از پژوهشگران، اعضای هیئت علمی، دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی و متخصصان دعوت میکند مقالات علمی و پژوهشی خود را در حوزههای روانشناسی ورزش، روانشناسی فعالیت بدنی، روانشناسی سلامت، رفتار حرکتی، علوم اعصاب، روانسنجی و سایر حوزههای میانرشتهای مرتبط ارسال کنند. این نشریه مقال…
🔥1🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
https://www.instagram.com/mbspscu/?g=5
Hard choices make us who we are. To learn more, watch our Jahesh Talk, here. Original TED talk link.
📚 شواهد جدید و قابلتوجه درباره کانون توجه و عملکرد حرکتی یک متاآنالیز شبکهای جدید، نکتهای مهم و روششناختی را درباره پژوهشهای کانون توجه مطرح کرده است. در این پژوهش، برخلاف بسیاری از مرورهای پیشین که تنها به برچسبهای کلی گزارششده در مقالات تکیه کرده بودند، متن واقعی دستورالعملهای کانون توجه دوباره بررسی و در سه گروه طبقهبندی شد: 🔹 کانون توجه بیرونی نزدیک 🔹 کانون توجه بیرونی دور 🔹 کانون توجه کلنگر پس از…
👍3
📈 JCR 2025 Sport Sciences در این گزارش، جدیدترین رتبهبندی و ضریب تأثیر (Impact Factor) مجلات علوم ورزشی ارائه شده است؛ مرجعی مهم برای پژوهشگران و دانشجویان جهت انتخاب مجلات معتبر برای انتشار مقالات.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mbspscu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گروه رفتار حركتي و روانشناسي ورزشي، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز” (@mbspscu), 383 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbspscu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.