Channel
@mbclub_stv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
732subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002249296591 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mbclub_stv |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mbclub_stv |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 732 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 731 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 734 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 738 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 734 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 735 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 734 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 734 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
43 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 62.8% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 14.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 6.98% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
70% из вас хотят знать, как выстроить стабильный поток клиентов без сарафанки 💸 Значит говорим об этом честно. Сарафанка — это прекрасно. Пока она работает. Но вот в чём проблема. Сарафанное радио строится на трёх вещах — на качестве вашей работы, на памяти людей и на их желании рекомендовать. Ни одним из этих трёх вы не управляете. Клиент доволен, но занят своей жизнью и забыл порекомендовать. Рекомендовал, но …
👍6❤4
Posted without readable text
❤3
Вы проголосовали и 70% хотят пользу про бизнес-процессы 🙏 Отлично. Буду давать. Но хочу дать именно то, что нужно вам, а не то, что кажется полезным мне. Отметьте всё, что сейчас актуально 👇
❤2
Posted without readable text
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2🔥1
Бизнес-клуб «МБ» / Ставрополь / Мероприятия pinned a photo
«Как продавать, когда аудитория не реагирует?» «Клиенты есть, а прибыли нет» «Боюсь поднять цены — вдруг все уйдут» «Не понимаю, куда утекают деньги» «Как выстроить команду, чтобы не делать всё самой?» Это не кризис и не выгоревшая аудитория. Это системный сбой. Продажи никуда не делись — они просто стали требовать другой логики. Пока кто-то ждёт лучших времён — Иконы бизнеса в июне проданы, Мэрил Стрип sold out (д…
❤🔥1
Она освободила женщин от корсетов. А кто освободит нас — от невозможности успевать всё и при этом оставаться живой? 🖤 14 августа в Кисловодске впервые пройдут Иконы бизнеса. Тема этого вечера особенная — Эволюция женщины. Мы разберём эволюцию бренда Шанель и эволюцию женщины — и вместе создадим новый код. Где есть код свободы Коко и эволюционный код современной женщины. Женщины, которая достигает — и при этом живё…
❤5
🎙️Как организовать мероприятие легко и с удовольствием — без выгорания и агрессивных продаж Две недели назад я провела «Иконы бизнеса» — Коко Шанель. 4 часа пролетели как один миг, отзывы приходят до сих пор. И следующие Иконы — Мэрил Стрип — уже полностью проданы 🔥 В этом подкасте делюсь своей системой из 5 шагов, как создавать мероприятия легко, красиво и с удовольствием — для себя и для участников. ___________…
❤🔥2
Иконы бизнеса — Коко Шанель прошли уже две недели назад. А эмоции до сих пор накрывают 🖤 Отзывы продолжают прилетать. Люди пишут, звонят, останавливают на улице. И вот в такие моменты я понимаю — мы в Ставрополе смогли создать что-то по-настоящему особенное. Качественное мероприятие с качественной аудиторией, с партнёрами, которые работают на 1000%, с атмосферой, которой в городе просто нет. Это очень приятно. И оче…
❤5🔥1
2 ПАРТИЯ ФОТОГРАФИЙ С ИКОН БИЗНЕСА ГОТОВА 📸 Забирайте фото себе: https://marinapogorelova.wfolio.pro/disk/koko-shanel-k4knns Благодарим за крутые фото нашего партнера @aaquamarine__ И за прекрасную фотозону нашего партнера @el_decor26 Будем рады вашим отметкам ❤️
❤3
ФОТО С ИКОН БИЗНЕСА ГОТОВЫ 📸 Это было удивительное мероприятие, обменялись нереальными эмоциями 🤍🙏🏻 Забирайте фото себе: https://obmachevskaya-alina.wfolio.pro/disk/17-06-2026-ikony-biznesa-83l2m3 Благодарим за крутые фото нашего партнера «на 360» Наталью Птичек @ptichka_znaet И за прекрасную фотозону нашего партнера @el_decor26 Будем рады вашим отметкам ❤️
🔥5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @mbclub_stv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бизнес-клуб «МБ» / Ставрополь / Мероприятия” (@mbclub_stv), 732 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbclub_stv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.