Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mazda Far | مزدافر مؤمنی

Channel

Mazda Far | مزدافر مؤمنی

@mazda_far

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,038subscribers

-53,846 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002486710523
TypeChannel
Username@mazda_far
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mazda_far

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

8,240 average views per post against 1,038 subscribers — an engagement rate of 793.5%. Across the 15,212 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,162 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 7.81% and 30.2%, with a median of 16.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (19 July 2026 18 August 2026)
Posts measured36 of 37 published in the window (0 exact, 36 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled296,500
Mature posts only806.9% over 35 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers1,038 measured 16 August 2026
Cohortb1000:fas · 15,212 channels · p10 3.68% · p25 7.81% · p50 16.1% · p75 30.2% · p90 49.7%
Position in cohort99.901th percentile · 49.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.279% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,03854,96428,0016 August 2026 — 54,884 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,887 subscribers8 August 2026 — 54,882 subscribers9 August 2026 — 54,901 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,907 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,912 subscribers12 August 2026 — 54,929 subscribers13 August 2026 — 54,964 subscribers14 August 2026 — 54,928 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,038 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -53,846. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 03:331,038-53,890
14 Aug 2026, 16:0954,928-36
13 Aug 2026, 05:1554,964+35
12 Aug 2026, 04:0254,929+17
11 Aug 2026, 05:5154,912+5
10 Aug 2026, 07:2054,907+6
9 Aug 2026, 09:5354,901+19
8 Aug 2026, 07:0054,882-5
7 Aug 2026, 08:2854,887+3
6 Aug 2026, 12:4854,884first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
793.5%
avg views ÷ 1,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,240
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held37 (30 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total296,500
Reactions total14,906
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

14,906 reactions across 36 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11,24675.4%
👍1,53710.3%
👏7194.82%
🕊3892.61%
👌3592.41%
💯2281.53%
🙏1771.19%
😭1320.886%
🔥1190.798%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,906reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC≈3,340 views312 reactionsread 15 August 2026

دوستانی که مایل هستن کانال جداگانه برای محتوای استاد مزدافر مؤمنی بسازیم پست بالا رو قلب بزارید ☝️

295👍12🙏4👏1

13 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTCviews —

Mazda Far | مزدافر مؤمنی pinned «یک تصمیم مهم 🌱 دوستانی که مدت‌هاست اینجا همراه من هستید، می‌خوام یک موضوع رو خیلی شفاف باهاتون در میون بذارم. این کانال در ابتدا از علاقه من به استاد مزدافر مومنی شکل گرفت و به همین دلیل خیلی از شما اینجا رو با این هویت می‌شناسید. اما من مدتیه به این نتیجه…»

13 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈4,990 views1,174 reactionsread 15 August 2026

یک تصمیم مهم 🌱 دوستانی که مدت‌هاست اینجا همراه من هستید، می‌خوام یک موضوع رو خیلی شفاف باهاتون در میون بذارم. این کانال در ابتدا از علاقه من به استاد مزدافر مومنی شکل گرفت و به همین دلیل خیلی از شما اینجا رو با این هویت می‌شناسید. اما من مدتیه به این نتیجه رسیدم که دوست دارم مسیر خودم رو جدی‌تر و مستقل‌تر دنبال کنم؛ مسیری درباره خودشناسی، ذهن‌آگاهی، رشد فردی و چیزهایی که خودم در این سال‌ها مطالعه و تجربه کردم. به همی

1,100👍32👌31👏11

13 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈5,470 views371 reactionsread 15 August 2026

خوش باش کـــه هر که راز داند داند کــه خوشی ، خوشی کِشاند شیرین چو‌ شِکَر تو بــاش شاکر شــاکِر هر دَم شِکَر سِتــاند @mazda_far

299🕊33👍26👏13

12 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC≈6,130 views396 reactionsread 15 August 2026

رِزق آید پیش هر که صبر جُست رَنج کوشش ها زِ بی‌صبری توست... 👤مولانا @mazda_far

298🕊44👏33🙏21

12 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈6,140 views254 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

میتونی با ذهنت زاویه چرخشش رو تغییر بدی ؟

132👍70😭37🔥15

12 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC≈6,040 views216 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ثروت و نعمت در جهان بی‌نهایت است اگر با دقت به مسیر زندگی انسان نگاه کنیم، یک حقیقت شگفت‌انگیز آشکار می‌شود: جهان هر روز در حال بسط و گسترش است. هر روز ماشین‌هایی با امکانات بیشتر ساخته می‌شوند، خانه‌ها شکل‌های تازه‌تری پیدا می‌کنند، کسب‌وکارهایی متولد می‌شوند که درآمدهای میلیاردی ایجاد می‌کنند و فناوری، امکاناتی را در اختیار انسان قرار می‌دهد که چند دهه پیش حتی تصورشان دشوار بود. این جریان نشان می‌دهد جهان در ذات

155👏34🕊20💯7

12 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈5,840 views289 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

برای رهایی از توهم ، با توهم نجنگ ، بیدار شو. برای رسیدن به حقیقت ، دنبال حقیقت نرو ، ساکت شو. چیزی برای به دست آوردن وجود ندارد، فقط باید آنچه را که همیشه در درونت بوده به یاد بیاوری... @mazda_far

220👍44🕊21😭4

11 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈6,580 views314 reactionsread 15 August 2026

تغییر یک مسیر همیشگی است. ذهن ما همیشه در معرض ورودی‌های مختلف قرار دارد؛ از آدم‌هایی که با آنها معاشرت می‌کنیم گرفته تا افکار، اخبار، باورها و محیطی که هر روز در آن زندگی می‌کنیم. اگر آگاهانه مراقب ورودی‌های ذهنمان نباشیم و به شکل مستمر روی خودمان کار نکنیم، خیلی زود از مسیری که برای رشد و تغییر انتخاب کرده‌ایم فاصله می‌گیریم. تغییر واقعی یک تصمیم لحظه‌ای نیست؛ یک انتخاب روزانه است. هر روز باید دوباره انتخاب کنیم

231👍39👏23🙏21

10 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC≈7,640 views359 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

تمام افراد موفق در دنیا،چه نسبت به قانون جذب آگاهی داشتن یا نداشتن از این قانون استفاده میکردن. "قانون جذب همواره کار میکنه چه ازش آگاهی داشته باشیم یا نداشته باشیم درست مثل قانون جاذبه زمین" ما یاد میگیریم که به بهترین شکل از این قانون استفاده کنیم چون قانون جهان هستی اصلا دست ما نیست و به خوبی عمل میکنه‌. "قانون جذب کاری نمیکنه که به ضرر یا سود ما انسان ها باشه بلکه این ما انسان ها هستیم که کاری میکنیم این قانون به

275👍52👏24🔥8

10 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈7,370 views345 reactionsread 15 August 2026

قانون فراوانی می گوید در جهان، نعمت ها هر روز در حال افزایش است. اگر با دقت به زندگی نگاه کنیم، این حقیقت را در همه جا می بینیم. هر روز ایده های تازه متولد می شوند، راه های جدیدی برای ساختن، آموختن و رشد کردن به وجود می آید، دانش انسان گسترده تر می شود، فرصت های تازه شکل می گیرد و مسیرهایی که روزی وجود نداشت، امروز در دسترس میلیون ها انسان قرار دارد. جهان، ایستا نیست؛ جهان در حال گسترش است و همراه با این گسترش، نعم

262💯48👏18👍17

10 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈8,150 views362 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

یکی از قدرتمندترین روش‌های تغییر، تکرار است. تکرار عادت‌های خوب، تکرار افکار سازنده و حتی تکرار و استمرار احساسات خوب. چون ذهن انسان با تکرار، مسیرهای عصبی را تقویت می‌کند و چیزی که امروز برایمان سخت و ناآشناست، با استمرار کم‌کم به رفتاری طبیعی و شخصیت ما تبدیل می‌شود و شخصیت ماست که نتایج آینده زندگی مان را رغم می زند . @mazda_far

287👏49🔥17🙏9

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @mazda_far. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTCAnonymous Poll1,780 voters approx.

شخصیت شما درونگراست یا برونگرا ؟

  1. درونگرا68%
  2. برونگرا32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 129,368 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mazda Far | مزدافر مؤمنی” (@mazda_far), 1,038 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mazda_far.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.