Channel
@mazanovlive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
142subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001592941460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mazanovlive |
| Created | 22 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mazanovlive |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 142 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 142 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🇷🇺 Что такое историческая память? 🏛 Каковы основные итоги международного форума "Без срока давности. Нюрнберг. 80 лет"? 📹 Обо всем в эксклюзивном интервью с руководителем Центра исторической памяти при Президенте России Еленой Петровной Малышевой. #жизнь #москва #безсрокадавности #память #история
🇷🇺 Завершился большой международный форум "Без срока давности. Нюрнберг. 80 лет". 🔎 Несколько дней наполненных смыслами и пониманием важности сохранения исторической памяти. История развивается по спирали, и сейчас в мире не самый лучший виток этой спирали: возрождается страшное зло - фашизм. Многие страны откровенно поддерживают и используют фашистские принципы. 🖊 Сегодня наша страна осталась единственной верной п…
🇷🇺 "Это был настоящий, неудержимый порыв. Люди искали опору в истинных патриотических ценностях". ©️ Владимир Путин. 🌍 Столкнувшись с человеконенавистнической политикой гитлеровской Германии, именно советские люди показали свою внутреннюю силу и моральное превосходство над врагом, показали пример самопожертвования во имя спасения своей страны и всего мира от нацистской чума. 🎨 На выставке "Великая Победа. Россия -…
20 ноября 1945 года в Нюрнберге начался первый международный судебный процесс над главными военными преступниками Третьего рейха На скамье подсудимых оказались высокопоставленные нацистские лидеры, которым были предъявлены обвинения в преступлениях против мира и человечности. Процесс шёл почти год – до 1 октября 1946-го. 12 человек были приговорены к смертной казни. Геноцид был официально признан международным прес…
Нюрнбергский процесс начался ровно 80 лет назад — 20 ноября 1945-го. 60 тысяч выданных пропусков, 403 заседания и почти 11 месяцев слушаний. Перед судом предстали не просто военные преступники, а целый государственный режим с его кровожадной идеологией и организациями-исполнителями. Впервые в международном уголовном праве появились такие понятия, как "преступление против человечности" и "преступление против мира". …
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @mazanovlive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,206,169 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мазанов.Live 🇷🇺” (@mazanovlive), 142 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mazanovlive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.