Video, posted without a caption
Signed Justin.h

Channel
@maybenavyblue
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001358723484 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maybenavyblue |
| Description | Dreams that make you disappointed http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=362824815 Wishlist: @wishlistofaugust Art channel: @august_suffers Crochet channel: @augustcrochets_store |
| Created | 3 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maybenavyblue |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 50 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 50 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (28 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 266 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Justin.h
خوبه حالا امیدوار بودی داستان نساختی و لفت دادی فرض کن
Signed Justin.h
Video, posted without a caption
Signed Justin.h
یه دلیلی هست بعضی تراپیستا خودشون تراپی نیازن
Signed Justin.h
بابا خیلی حرفه.
Signed Justin.h
وای لینگویینی هم هستم
Signed Justin.h
اینقد خوشحال شدم
Signed Justin.h
عکس گرفتن ازم؟
Signed Justin.h
اگر حوصلتون سر رفته بیاین این تست (طولانی نیست، نیاز به فیلتر شکن نداره و درباره اینه که به کدوم کرکتر ها از فیلم/سریال/انیمه شبیه هستید با این تفاوت که کرکتر هایی که بهتون میده به طرز عجیبی زیادن و خیلی جالبه واقعا) رو بدید و اگر دوست داشتید نتیجشو/اونایی که خودتون دوست داشتیدو بذارید3>>>
Signed Justin.h
This is so fucked up that some of y'all regenerate and retell the story you actually made up over and over again just to get sympathy and approval from others over highly sensitive topics especially war and death of people. Grow the fuck up already. You're not at a kindergarten anymore. Fuckin hell.
🍓1💔1
Signed Justin.h
Why you can't stop thinking about Obsession https://youtube.com/watch?v=3c67cz1jvgM&si=XAZewMCzudeJ153F
Signed Justin.h
لیست ریتوییت برای اعدامیان اصفهان : توییت اول توییت دوم توییت سوم توییت چهارم توییت پنجم توییت ششم توییت هفتم توییت هشتم توییت نهم توییت دهم توییت یازدهم توییت دوازدهم توییت سیزدهم توییت چهاردهم توییت پانزدهم توییت شانزدهم توییت هفدهم توییت هجدهم توییت نوزدهم ریتوییت ها : ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریتوییت ریت…
Signed Justin.h
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @maybenavyblue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“- Parmeside 🎆-” (@maybenavyblue), 50 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maybenavyblue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.