На тему парадокса самоконтроля, новая статья. Попробуем разобраться, что мы можем делать не так https://teletype.in/@analizclusters/KePvjDzZTez
🔥2

Channel
@mayakpolezno
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
194subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001649202107 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mayakpolezno |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mayakpolezno |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 194 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 195 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 195 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
54 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 38.9% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 24.1% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 22.2% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2023 to 11 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На тему парадокса самоконтроля, новая статья. Попробуем разобраться, что мы можем делать не так https://teletype.in/@analizclusters/KePvjDzZTez
🔥2
https://teletype.in/@analizclusters/cYG8qQRNVJi
👍5
Третья статья из серии разборов рынка. Аномалии перед снижением. 🔥156 активов с аномалиями
Channel photo updated
Вторая статья из серии разборов роста рынка. 🔥 177 актива с аномалиями из 335 пар бинанса 🔥 4 группы активов с аномалиями
Первая статья из серии разбора роста рынка. 🔥 224 актива с аномалиями из 331 пар бинанса 🔥 4 группы активов с аномалиями
👍5🔥1🤨1
https://t.me/analizclusters/4990
Расшифровка аббревиатур КК - крупный кластер КО -крупный объем АКС - аномальное количество сделок КС - количество сделок КГ - кластерный график СС - сессионный список КЗ - крайние значения
🔥9👍2🥰1
Страхование страхование страхование Возвращаясь к вопросу о стопах, хочется сказать о необходимости ставить стопы, ограничивать риски, прописывать в своей торговой стратегии параметры риск менеджмента. Многие до сих пор не используют стопы, веря в правильность определения направления движения ликвидности. Но это рынок и все может мгновенно изменится. Каждая ситуация на рынке индивидуальна. На примерах из жизни хоч…
❤13👏3
Почему я отмечаю аномалии как дополнительные аргументы на биржах коинбейс и кракен? У данных бирж как и у бинанс высокие показатели коэффициента ликвидности. Я часто замечал, что появление объемов даже на низколиквидных парах на этих биржах подтверждают спрос/предложение определенные на бинанс. Хоть объемы на многих парах не высокие, но как мне кажется они честные. https://coinmarketcap.com/ru/rankings/exchanges/ …
👍9
#ETH +2,4% Не додержал я #шорт Было повышение бидов, индекс альтов близко к балансу, покупки по рынку и все же продажи произошли Возьму на заметку такую ситуацию
👏3
#ETH Закрываю шорт в убыток, следы предложения не увеличиваются
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mayakpolezno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mayakpolezno named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маяк ликвидности | полезное” (@mayakpolezno), 194 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mayakpolezno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.