И вы еще пиздели на Сырника. Он был во всем прав, сука. Абсолютная база. Все 4 часа. Он умер за ваши грехи, уебки
👍8

Channel
@maxsychshow
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
233subscribers
+38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001395449236 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maxsychshow |
| Created | Between 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maxsychshow |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 233 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 227 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 223 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 220 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 217 | +17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 200 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 195 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 195 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
131 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 58.8% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 14.5% | |
| 💅 | 13 | 9.92% | |
| 🤡 | 12 | 9.16% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 6.11% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И вы еще пиздели на Сырника. Он был во всем прав, сука. Абсолютная база. Все 4 часа. Он умер за ваши грехи, уебки
👍8
Как ахуенно и смешно смотреть на тех же сальных бабищ, что осуждали Питомник и его свиту, но сами побежали на перегонки к Стинту, а теперь к Братишкину и опять, донаты симпов, мольбы на коленях и чуть ли глаза друг другу не выкалывают. Унижения ради секунды славы, вау. Кажется Блека права и Питомник не главная проблема втубинга...
💅7❤1
Я бы на его месте тоже облысел, если бы увидел нейроклипы и бабки которые лутает следук
❤10
На наших экранах произошло терпения года пизже чем у Озона. Две звездочки Смокимоки и Миреднеси казалось бы непримиримые враги (без рофлов), а затерпели ради колабика и испугались устроить крик хоть ради навозика. СИНЕМА А у большинства марамоек и их тиневых нихуя не вышло и они просто просрали деньги в пустоту КАК И СЛЕДАК 10К ГА ГА ГА. А че вы ждали от соприкоснования верхов и витубинга? Га-га, мне все нравится я …
❤5
Стинт, грей их до конца, дои их, высасывай
❤6
Акане Иваве респект за яйца
❤7
Вот смотрю как витуберши выпрыгивают из трусов и кидают сами донаты, греются как ПОСЛЕДНИЕ ГОИ только лишь бы господин Стинтик их заметил, ЛМАО
❤9
Ой, у меня тоже чот инет побарахтил.... Не понял че такое случилось? Это все?
🤡2
Как приятно, что Юрец не посмотреть видео Мехальфа, но все же присел на красный стул у Стинта и наслаждается
❤12
По немногу буду заливать архивы для просмотров, кто пропустил хронологию с самого старта истории. От гнилого вбросчика и вруна https://youtu.be/cQNI9cBpmQE
❤5
Ой, мало того, что сразу прайм подключили под хайповый видос Михалыча.... Так ещё чисто по совпадению Юи отвалился тытернет, ой, не надо было подарочки принимать от Камыша🤡🤡
🤡7
Осуждаю, но у вас есть виза?
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @maxsychshow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сычевальня максыча (◕‿◕)” (@maxsychshow), 233 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maxsychshow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.