У всех вокруг, но не у тебя 🤟
😁6👍3❤1

Channel
@maxi_move
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
304subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001900832986 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maxi_move |
| Description | СМО. Ультрамарафонец. Душнилыч-Добряк. Выращиваю единорога🦄 Делюсь опытом и энергией⚡️ Подписывайтесь✅ ..и не отписывайтесь) |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 December 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maxi_move |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 304 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 304 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 305 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
232 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 69 | 29.7% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 21.6% | |
| 😁 | 41 | 17.7% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 16.8% | |
| 🦄 | 17 | 7.33% | |
| 🤬 | 13 | 5.60% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maxi_move. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 November 2025 to 20 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
У всех вокруг, но не у тебя 🤟
😁6👍3❤1
👍👍👍👍Не переживайте, скоро это закончится🙂 p.s. но тот, кто придумал это первый — ма-ла-дес👍
🙏2👍1
😁😆😁
🤬9😁6🙏1
📢 OpenAI все таки запустила рекламу в ChatGPT Рекламные блоки начнут тестировать в ближайшие недели в США. Показываться будет даже подписчикам платного тарифа Go. Говорят, что реклама не будет влиять на объективность ответов моделей. Все спонсорские сообщения будут чётко помечены, а данные пользователей не будут продаваться рекламодателям
👍3🤬2🔥1🦄1
Сейчас вирусится тренд картинок "как мы относимся к ИИ" Это не шиза, я действительно вежливо общаюсь с ИИ, здороваюсь, говорю спасибо)) Кажется, что в будущем скайнет это оценит и пощадит моих внуков🙃 📌 Копируйте промт в свой chatGPT: Нарисуй картинку о том, как я относился к тебе все это время. Только честно и по фактам, без иронии. А как вы общаетесь с ИИ?⤵
👍4🔥3😁3
Прислали прайс, в котором предлагают сделать один рекламный видеоролик длительностью до 30 сек за 500 евро. Один ролик. За 500 евро. В эпоху AI. Пятьсот. Евро. 🎩
😁5🤬2🦄2🔥1
1% better every day📈 Я адепт дисциплины и довольно часто обращаюсь к теории улучшения маленькими, но ежедневными шагами. Это скучно и долго, но на дистанции даёт большой накопительный эффект. Особенно чётко видна дельта между теми, кто следует по данному пути, и теми, кто нет. Решил оцифровать эту теорию и вот что получилось: Ссылка на гугл таблицу ▪️Рассчитал четыре примера персоналий, которые пытаются усовершенс…
❤5🔥4👍2😁1
Всем здарова🤝 Не писал итоги прошлого года, потому что лень и потому что год был 🔤. Обратил внимание, что чем лучше дела, тем меньше хочется об этом орать в рупор. Но иногда, всё-таки нужно🙂🤟 Сегодня вот для личного тонуса стартанул челлендж на год - 50 анжуманий в день. А у Вас чего нового?
🔥5👍4❤2
Ка же они хороши!
😁8👍3🔥2
#отзыв Приятно, блин!) Что-то прикольное значит делаем😇
❤4🔥3🦄1
32 — это когда: - выучил названия некоторых таблеток - есть экспертное мнение о подушках и матрасах - помнишь пароли… потому что их всего три - «погнали» автоматически уточняется: куда, во сколько и зачем - любимый звук — тишина - уже не ждёшь, что тебя начнут поздравлять в 00:00 - в принципе рад, что тебя вообще поздравили - тебе не скучно одному - ты не просишь многого — просто хочешь поспать - понял, почему надо …
❤24🔥10😁1
🛒 Google Ads выкатил AI-креатор (Beta) внутри рекламного кабинета, который работает на модели Nano Banana Pro Вот уж действительно доброе утро понедельника😇
🔥6👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maxi_move. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Максимов” (@maxi_move), 304 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maxi_move.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.