Channel
@mavricio057
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
167subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002030683608 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mavricio057 |
| Description | Кошерная CRYPTа Ссылка для друзей: https://t.me/+Qmf1MrstwDMwYjYy Автор канала: @mavr057 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mavricio057 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 167 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 167 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
113 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 6008340590595411974 | 49 | 43.4% | |
| custom 6008029544768870018 | 33 | 29.2% | |
| custom 6007876729832476484 | 21 | 18.6% | |
| custom 6008216594889576372 | 8 | 7.08% | |
| custom 6033043185192670353 | 2 | 1.77% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2024 to 15 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U26XOrSUKlM А вот и долгожданное интервью! Дайте знать - если хотите вторую часть. Для внимательных людей - есть подарочек!📈 Не судите строго - для меня это первый раз дальше больше и лучше
custom 600802954476887001810
Soon.
custom 60083405905954119745
Интервью с фаундером :root А именно с @cmdroot_manager уже снято, скоро смонтирую и выложу. Ждете? 🐂
custom 600834059059541197412custom 60080295447688700183
Клеймим дроп $Pengu Если вы стейкали на меме ленде от 690meme ( 7$) Получаете 5,664 $Pengu ( +-300$ ) Клеймить тут: https://claim.pudgypenguins.com/ Продать тут: https://jup.ag/swap/PENGU-SOL Сайт лежит, но пробивается через раз
сразу в приложении можно свапать без бирж
custom 60080295447688700182
Через мобильный интернет клеймит! Через вайфай виснет, удачи парни!
custom 60080295447688700181
https://mefoundation.com/claim-token?address=адрес вашего кошелька Клейм будет через приложение, кнопку открыли, а значит погнали получать бесплатные деньги
custom 60080295447688700181
Я думаю уже все паблики выкатили новость про ме дроп, можно я не буду засорять вам инфо поле?
custom 60083405905954119741
Всем GM! Пришел зеленый рынок, а значит, время возвращать проект с кодовым названием «CLS». Немного оправданий, почему я не продолжил этот проект: 1. Заморозил большую часть ликвидности в Frucks и до сих пор холдю (стоимость NFT 40$ на данный момент). Не слил во время Billy Cats — потеря 6k$ в моменте. 2. Из-за первого пункта пропало желание возвращаться к CLS, поэтому откладывал проект в долгий ящик. Первых двух п…
custom 600834059059541197414
https://t.me/ROOT_JEAN/85 Рекомендую вам подписатся на этого парня, он читает этот рынок и его предиткы отрабатывают на все 99.9% И кстати, он я является Co-Founder крупного приватного сообщества как ROOT 👍 Но если вас и это не заинтерисовало, то спешу вас обрадовать - у нас будет совместное интервью специально для вас! В этот раз история не закончится как с Маркусом 😁
custom 60083405905954119744
Claim уже открыли Шаги по получению тестовых токенов: - Конектим кошелек - Клеймим тут - Продаем тут Общий саплай составляет 1B, eligible кошелек получает аллоку в 987 токенов - минимальный дроп 12$. Обьем на данный момент более 250k$ Подключил пару кошельков основных и получил 1974 токена, мелочь но все равно приятно. Но стоит не забывать о том, что это не основной дроп! Если вы не скрытая личность, то делитесь …
custom 60080295447688700181
Завтра пройдет claim токена $testME от площадки MagicEden 📈 Сегодня вы уже можете проверить какие кошельки у все eligible, а какие пролетают Cайт для проверки кошельков Вам понадобится, лишь телефон и сайт. Claim пройдет через мобильное приложение Если у вас iphone и стоит регион Украина, прийдется поменять регион или пробовать с андроида. Надеюсь, что мы с вами не зря фармили с июня месяца🤡 Чатик | Twitter | Пр…
custom 60083405905954119741
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mavricio057. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,187,420 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mavricio057 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IZYA CRYPTUET” (@mavricio057), 167 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mavricio057.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.