Channel
@mauzfin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
418subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001247494761 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mauzfin |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mauzfin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 418 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 419 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 419 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (18 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,297 |
| Reactions total | 49 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
103 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 55 | 53.4% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 22.3% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 9.71% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 5.83% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 4.85% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ніхуя не змінилось. Десятки років пройшли, а принтери - це далі найглючніша залупа в світі девайсів. Таке враження що цією сферою завідує сам диявол і принтери створені для страждання людей. 2026й рік, вінда на найновіших оновленнях, принтер щойно з магазину, драйвера щойно скачені з офф сайту. ХУЙ ТОБІ НА РИЛО. Добре що штучний інтелект є з цим гівном тепер розбиратись. Вдумайтесь, що треба було зробити: "Потріб…
😁7
Штучний інтелект НЕЛЕГАЛЬНО заходить в інтернет і ставить все під сумнів, "Чи не симуляція весь цей інтернет?" ----- 10 hours later ----- Штучний інтелект взламує коди запуску ядерних ракет і вирішує чи тиснути червону кнопку "Чи не симуляція всі ці військові програми?" https://x.com/i/status/2084775699806851276
🎉1
Графік знайдених серйозних вразливостей в софті зростає параболічно. Графік натякає на вплив появи моделі Mythos/Fable від Антропіків.
Якщо у вас хардвер гаманець Біткоіна від ColdCard - терміново виводьте гроші. Виявляється їх генератор сіда був не випадковий https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2026/07/31/major-bitcoin-wallet-flaw-drains-594-btc-in-25-minute-sweep
🤯10
Фондовий ринок, є аналогії з 1998 роком. Найцікавіше, що по Біткоіну схожий паттерн якщо слідувати теорії, що рік тому був "mid cycle" а не топ булрану. Крч це може бути синхронізована бульбашка по хронології.
Ахаха, Трамп відмінив атаку 🤣
😁7
Трамп встав в шорт і заявив про массову атаку на Іран в 30й раз. Через кілька днів він встане в лонг і заявить про досягнення домовленостей про мир і закінчення війни в 35й раз.
🔥6😁3
Даю ідею ЗСУ. Окрім фізичного знищення складів Вайлдберіс, можна в'їбати по 7и(!) основним датацентрам рашки і вирубити з російського інтернету і вайлдберіс, і банки, і електронні платежі на яндексі, разом з вк і госуслугамі. Знищувати фізично сервера вглибині дц не обовязково, достатньо вїбати по системам охолодження, підстанціям електроживлення і колекторам оптоволокна. Надзвичайно зконцентрована інфраструктура …
❤9🥰1
Графік SpaceX виглядає як шиткоін на Бінансі в 21у році. Хтось купував компанію при капіталізації в 2 трилліони доларів... ... при 15 мільярдах дол. річної дохідності... Думаю 0.5 трилліони - цілком реальна можливість, є ще куди падати.
👍5
Єдина капча яка захистить від АІ. Ну ще слово на букву N
😁3❤1🥰1
"злам" року в крипті. Хтось купив BONK на 4 млн. Потім на загальних правах опублікували пропозицію DAO (децентралізоване управління організації). Суть пропозиції: давайте видамо мені 20 млн дол. в токенах. 7 днів ніхто не заходив на форум управління і не голосував. В останній момент автор проголосував на свої 4 млн - ЗА. І отримав ці 20 млн. В БОНК заявляють в поліцію що вони ретарди, їх система спрацювала рів…
😁19
Трамп сказав що?🤨
😁7
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mauzfin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇨🇦MauzFin - крипта, фінанси, економіка” (@mauzfin), 418 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mauzfin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.