![Telegram profile photo for [Я - ХОУМСТЕЙДЖЕР]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/70/70fcc656e8101836b4248e33f591a5e70ba565051d2278c11dbd24798457258c.jpg)
Channel
@matveeva_homest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
68subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002487138455 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @matveeva_homest |
| Description | Хоумстейджинг как искусство продавать |
| Created | 9 December 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/matveeva_homest |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 68 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 68 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 9 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
211 reactions across 7 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 56 | 26.5% | |
| ❤ | 50 | 23.7% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 16.6% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 14.7% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 5.21% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.84% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.90% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.948% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.948% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.948% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.474% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 17 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие мои подписчики! Начала я вести этот канал с понятия «хоумстейджинг», потом десять раз передумала им быть. Готовя дом на продажу, мы не знаем, какой придет покупатель, что он любит, каким видит свой дом. Поэтому получается симпатичненько, но без души. А я привыкла работать с конкретными людьми, задачами и личными предпочтениями. И украшая дом на продажу во мне возникает внутренний конфликт. С одной стороны з…
🔥11❤10👏4
Знаете что-нибудь про архетипы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Ну что… Буду седлать своего конька в новом направлении Несколько последних лет я глубоко нахожусь в теме архетипов, это уже базовая прошивка, на которую можно наложить абсолютно любую деятельность и тему. Архетипы пронизывают нашу жизнь, через их призму мы видим все вокруг и формируем свою картину мира. И интерьеры - часть нашей картины мира. Оглянитесь вокруг. Как выглядит дом, в котором вы живете? Какие эмоции в…
❤🔥10✍2❤2👀2
Вчера прям посмеялась Изучаю очередной модуль Хоумстейджинга, а там… «У вас не будет второго шанса произвести первое впечатление»💃 Коко, и тут ты? Я, конечно, всегда считала тебя великой, но чтобы из мира моды залететь в интерьеры больше чем через полвека после смерти - это прям уровень Но смех смехом, а параллель очевидна. Если вы решили продать или сдать квартиру [особенно в условиях высокой конкуренции], то ва…
❤🔥21👍4✍2💅2🔥2
История. Жила-была Барб… Нет, не Барби, а Барб Шварц. Не буду утверждать, что все, что я напишу ниже - правда. Потому что докопаться до нее сейчас ну ой как непросто. Собрала по кусочками из кучи источников, если где приврала - не со зла, не судите Была она (Барб, то есть) театральным декоратором. А потом стала риэлтором. Американцы были избалованы тем, что недвижимость росла в цене и продавалась с пол пинка. А …
❤13💔11🔥9💘3
[Я - ХОУМСТЕЙДЖЕР] pinned a photo
Ну и моя первая работа на курсе - виньетка. Это такой стилистический прием, особое расположение предметов, создающих атмосферу и как бы зовущих - оставайся, здесь есть все, чтобы ты чувствовал себя дома 🏠 А я-то всегда думала, что это такой разблюр вокруг фоточки🙈
👍25❤🔥17🔥13
Меня зовут Наталия Матвеева и я шопоголик завела канал ученика. 9 лет назад выползая из трех декретов я выбирала, куда сделать шаг из дома во взрослый мир без памперсов и застрявших в обручальном кольце какашек. И интерьеры я… не выбрала, хотя они были в списке. Почему-то этот путь показался несравнимо долгим и трудным. Два глобальных ремонта [один в состоянии глубокой беременности, второй - в статусе многодетной м…
❤24❤🔥8🥰6🍾4👍2👻2😁1
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @matveeva_homest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Знаете что-нибудь про архетипы?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 17 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[Я - ХОУМСТЕЙДЖЕР]” (@matveeva_homest), 68 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matveeva_homest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.