Ну наконец-то лям!!!😭💔 Всегда была рядышком с этой цифрой и всегда что-то шло не по планам Но не сегодня! Ура 🥹🥹
🔥20custom 52358072067707504077custom 52357103552582233414

Channel
@mattyulia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
117subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002548619424 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mattyulia |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mattyulia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 117 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 115 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 116 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 116 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
131 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 50 | 38.2% | |
| ❤ | 35 | 26.7% | |
| custom 5235589164166032324 | 18 | 13.7% | |
| custom 5235807206770750407 | 9 | 6.87% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 4.58% | |
| custom 5235909723345136719 | 5 | 3.82% | |
| custom 5235710355258223341 | 4 | 3.05% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 3.05% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну наконец-то лям!!!😭💔 Всегда была рядышком с этой цифрой и всегда что-то шло не по планам Но не сегодня! Ура 🥹🥹
🔥20custom 52358072067707504077custom 52357103552582233414
Как я счастлива оказаться здесь ⭐️⭐️ Помню в детстве досмотривала кассету, перекручивала и снова смотрела, могла пересматривать несколько раз подряд, знала абсолютно все реплики и как же круто, что это детская мечта исполнилась 😭💔 Интересно, что всегда относила себя к Гриффиндору и была уверена, что когда-нибудь я буду в мантии Гермионы, по итогу за день до этого решила, что Слизерин тоже мне подходит и цвет красив…
❤11custom 52355891641660323245👍4custom 52358072067707504072
Остров Мадейра, лес Posto Florestal de Fanal ну или моя мечта когда-нибудь оказаться там! Мой первый ai-ролик, реализм внешности, деталей, места. Вся работа выполнена с нуля, от идеи до реализации пару дней точно💔
❤11🔥9custom 52355891641660323242
✨Фоторамка✨ своими руками: WB: Акриловая краска — #41645495 идеальный цвет, идеальное нанесение, я в восторге от нее! Рамка — #193728529 Клеевой пистолет — #151476879 Ozon: Полусферы — #3202239104 Лак — #170211393 (я не наносила, мне понравилась шоколадная акриловая краска без глянца) У меня была еще идея купить ткань, чтобы фото разместить именно на ней, но я не успела заказать, может быть в дальнейшем усовершенс…
🔥9🥰6custom 52355891641660323244
Новый проект: гайд «Глобальное расхламление дома» Очень нравится эта работа! Такая утонченная и нежная. Думаю, что все-таки просмотр Бриджертонов повлиял на дизайн страниц. Особенно нравится винтажный стиль, я прям вдохновляюсь им🦢
🔥12custom 52359097233451367195custom 52355891641660323243
🌟News последних недель >> Хотелось бы делиться таким чаще, но рассказывать о себе не так-то и просто! Всегда стараюсь быть на позитиве, всегда с улыбкой, редко от меня можно услышать какие-то жалобы, но накопительная усталость (моральная) дает о себе знать, ловлю чувство апатии и не понимаю, как с него выбираться⭐️ 1️⃣В марте много работала, но для меня это только в радость. Голова забита только рабочими процессами…
❤13custom 52355891641660323244
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @mattyulia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 680,941 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юля на фрилансе” (@mattyulia), 117 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mattyulia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.