Channel
@mathvera_beo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
84subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002322693024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mathvera_beo |
| Description | Дневник (не всегда) математических дел, к которым приложила руку. Или хотела бы приложить. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mathvera_beo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 84 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 84 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 85 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (17 June 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 759 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
18 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 77.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 16.7% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот, что мы сегодня сделали (Детали на клетчатом фоне - то, что осталось сделать) 2 часа, 6 человек, 7 фигур Скотча надо больше Волонтёры прекрасны, но (пока) не все готовы приносить свои идеи, но все готовы делать Конечно, было бы здорово иметь коробки побольше, но пока так Спасибо всем, кто участвовал!
🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
Хочу сделать математическую выставку и для этого мне нужны подростки-волонтёры На выставке я совершенно точно хочу большие детали катамино (референс из мышематики) Есть ещё несколько вещей, которые хотелось бы сделать руками Выставка должна быть такой, что на ней было бы интересно и малышам, и взрослым Зачем мне подростки-волонтёры 1. Так будет быстрее. А то сама я уже год делаю эту выставку в голове, но ещё не пр…
❤1
Наташа рассказала ещё год назад, что с играми можно проводить турниры. И я провела. Игры в математике Вообще, игры в математике — тема хорошая и сама по себе. Даже если выдать подборку игр на стратегии. В этом случае каждую игру надо решить: понять, у кого из игроков есть выигрышная стратегия, в чём она заключается и обосновать, что она всегда приводит к успеху. Иногда доказать, что у игрока есть стратегия можно, а …
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
Про три ближайших дня в Лав и Жабац Можно ещё записаться, вместе веселее 15-17 июля два курса для 6-8 класса (подробности выше) 16 июля - игры вокруг математики для людей 5,5 лет (можно немного младше или немного старше) подробности выше 15 июля - отмена игр для детей (никто не записался)
Игры вокруг математики для людей 5,5 лет Даты и время: 15 июля, 10.00-12.00 — первая группа 16 июля, 10.00-12.00 — вторая группа Место: Лав и Жабац Цена: донат Что будем делать: будем играть в игры, складывать бумагу, играть с конструктором. Оба дня одинаковые, так что записывайтесь на один день Почему за донат? Есть несколько причин: 1. я давно не работала с людьми 5 лет и хочу восстановить навыки 2. потому что это …
❤4
Математические курсы для тех, кто любит математику (6-8 класс) Даты: 15, 16 и 17 июля Место: Лав и Жабац Время: 13.00-14.30 — признаки делимости в разных системах счисления 15.00-16.30 — одним разрезом (Fold and Cut Theorem) Для кого: для людей 6-8 класса, которые увлекаются математикой и не боятся сложностей Что будем делать: на обоих курсах будет очень много экспериментов и практики, после этого будет выдвигать ги…
❤2
Сейчас будет два анонса. Один для детей постарше (6-8 класс), один для детей помладше (5,5 лет)
Почти два месяца назад провели олимпиаду МТ классов И вот наконец могу поделиться результатами) Вот сайт, на котором можно посмотреть подробные результаты участников. https://mtclasses-olympiad.lovable.app/results Там можно посмотреть результаты по странам и площадкам. Я некоторое время залипала, рассматривая табличку Среди людей 9-10 лет был 71 участник. К сожалению, в этом году вариант получился сложный. Многих м…
❤5
Ещё анонсы: 5-7 класс, intellectum academy Суббота, 20.06 13.00-14.30 Математическая игра "Карусель" Командная игра, в которой надо давать правильные ответы 1000 (но лучше уточнить у администратора @Intellectum_extracurricular) И математическое погружение для 5-7 класса в Лав и Жабац 22-26.06, 10.00-13.30 Для тех, кого математика радует Две пары математики с перерывом в 30 минут Перекус приносить с собой. Будем реша…
🥰1
Завтра (четверг, 18.06) финальные занятия двух кружков, на которые можно прийти без специальных знаний: 2-3 класс, лав и жабац, 15.00-16.00 и 16.20-17.20 Математический квест 1500 5-7 класс, intellectum academy, 17.50-19.20 Развёртки (Будем клеить, говорить, думать и смотреть математические этюды) 1000 Пишите мне, если хотите прийти (Ещё будет анонс про субботу и про следующую неделю)
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @mathvera_beo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 159,676 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Математическая Вера. Белград.” (@mathvera_beo), 84 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mathvera_beo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.