Channel
@math_zoom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
483subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001872204400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @math_zoom |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/math_zoom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 483 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 481 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 485 | +10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 475 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 476 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 476 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
193 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5240500150031378368 | 75 | 38.9% | |
| custom 5240047490543159151 | 24 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5244661565319313223 | 22 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5440392046860856689 | 19 | 9.84% | |
| custom 5240346656490154318 | 18 | 9.33% | |
| custom 5442964642076843374 | 16 | 8.29% | |
| custom 5442712596216045946 | 12 | 6.22% | |
| custom 5440362033629390160 | 7 | 3.63% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мой ответ ❤️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 54429646420768433744custom 54403920468608566892custom 54427125962160459461
🤎🤎🤎🤎🤍🤎 У бабушки двое часов, но одни отстают каждый час на 5 минут, а другие убегают вперёд каждый час на 5 минут. Однажды внук бабушки в воскресенье в 12:00 завёл эти часы и установил правильное время. На следующий день бабушка обнаружила, что время на часах отличается ровно на 5 часов. Сколько времени было на самом деле в этот момент?
custom 54429646420768433745
🐚🐚🐚 🐚🐚🐚🐚🐚🐚 🐚 🐚🐚🐚🐚🐚🐚🐚🐚🐚 🤩 Факт 1. 70 % улучшают результат. Примерно 7 из 10 выпускников, пришедших на пересдачу профильной математики, получают балл выше, чем в первый раз. То есть шансы не просто есть — они реально высокие. 🤩 Факт 2. Старый балл сгорает. Это самый важный нюанс: как только ты подаёшь заявление на пересдачу, предыдущий результат аннулируется. Даже если на первой попытке было 80, а на пересдаче набе…
custom 54403920468608566895custom 54403620336293901604custom 54427125962160459464
По данным Рособрнадзора, в 2026 году около 17 287 выпускников пересдавали профильную математику. Из них: Улучшили результат — примерно 68% (около 11 700 человек). Оставили результат без изменений — около 7% (примерно 1 200 человек). Ухудшили результат — примерно 25% (около 4 400 человек).
custom 54427125962160459464custom 54403620336293901603custom 54403920468608566893
Знания растворяются в летнем тумане, как ёжик… но выход есть!!! ☀️ Лето — это отдых, но не для знаний. Каждый год слышу от родителей в сентябре: «За каникулы всё забыл». И это упрямая статистика: за 2–3 месяца ученик может потерять до 30% усвоенного материала. 💋Чтобы этого не случилось, не нужны 5 уроков в неделю. Достаточно 1–2 спокойных занятий, на которых мы вспоминаем главное и сразу закрепляем всё на практике.…
custom 54403920468608566898custom 54427125962160459463custom 54429646420768433743
Лето репетитора: утром — занятия, днём — выставки с экзотическими экспонатами! 🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 Угадайте, какое животное на фото? 🤩
custom 52405001500313783688custom 52403466564901543184custom 54429646420768433744custom 54403920468608566891
У какой пирамиды есть апофема?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 52405001500313783687custom 52446615653193132234custom 52400474905431591513
Posted without readable text
custom 52405001500313783686custom 52403466564901543183custom 52446615653193132233
#Пирамида
custom 52405001500313783686custom 52403466564901543183custom 52400474905431591512
😀 Говорю своим ученикам: «Ваши работы будут смотреть под лупой!» — и сама в этот момент думаю, что, конечно, это всего лишь гипербола речи. 😀 Но нет, это не преувеличение, в аудиториях проверки ЕГЭ в 2026 году ЛУПЫ были!!! 😀😀😀😀
custom 52405001500313783689custom 52446615653193132234custom 52400474905431591513
Во сколько раз объем конуса меньше объема цилиндра, если они имеют равные высоты и радиусы оснований?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 52405001500313783687custom 52400474905431591512custom 52446615653193132232
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @math_zoom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Мой ответ ❤️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
У какой пирамиды есть апофема?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Во сколько раз объем конуса меньше объема цилиндра, если они имеют равные высоты и радиусы оснований?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Математика 🧮 Онлайн” (@math_zoom), 483 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/math_zoom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.