Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МАСЛОВА PRO Dевелопмент

Channel

МАСЛОВА PRO Dевелопмент

@maslova_prospaces

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

214subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003851923792
TypeChannel
Username@maslova_prospaces
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 17 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/maslova_prospaces

Topic

Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

193214203.57 August 2026 — 193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 193 subscribers16 August 2026 — 196 subscribers24 August 2026 — 199 subscribers31 August 2026 — 202 subscribers9 September 2026 — 211 subscribers18 September 2026 — 214 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:41214+3
9 Sept 2026, 22:15211+9
31 Aug 2026, 17:02202+3
24 Aug 2026, 21:28199+3
16 Aug 2026, 14:28196+3
8 Aug 2026, 11:49193no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:43193first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3044.8%
🔥2638.8%
811.9%
💯22.99%
🤝11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC106 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Стройка и точка. Все адекватные люди, даже не будучи профессионалами, прекрасно понимают: если в хате (на стройке) грязь и бардак, ничего хорошего не жди. Одно из моих наблюдений, переросших в опыт: если на площадке бедлам, построят проект плохо. Чистота и порядок на строительных площадках — это индикатор качества. Это отношение собственников и топ‑менеджмента к бизнесу и клиентам. Об этом точно стоит задуматься,

🔥9👍2💯21

1 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC146 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда умирает небоскреб? Лонгрид 2 🌆 270 Park Avenue - 215 м, Нью-Йорк (жизненный цикл 1960—2021) 270 Park Avenue открыли в 1960 году как штаб-квартиру Union Carbide (фото 1). Строгая модернисткая тонированная коробка без украшений - здание осознанно избегало выразительности. Спустя десятилетия выяснилось, что несмотря на простую форму внутренние решения не были хорошо продуманы - этажи были неэффективны, а конст

🔥9👍1

1 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC123 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда умирает небоскреб? Лонгрид 1 Слышу очень много разговоров о девелоперском ЦИКЛЕ проекта и СРОКАХ, которые не дают покоя ни инвесторам, ни девелоперам. Тема, соглашусь, более чем актуальная, критически влияющая на финрез и прибыль в конце. Обычно все говорят о финансовом цикле — сколько времени девелопер строит от заветных РНС до РНВ. Это сейчас важнейший трек для рынка. Давайте посмотрим шире - какой же на

👍21

28 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC247 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Забор. Каждый уважающий себя девелопер втыкает по периметру стройки так называемый «маркетинговый забор». Ну, скажем, иногда маркетинговый, так как часто это имеет антимаркетинговое воздействие. Дорогие мои, забор — это тоже инструмент продаж. В моей личной практике я закрыла на «заборе» не один десяток сделок! Проезжая по Москве, я постоянно вижу заборы девелоперских проектов. И в 90 % случаев задаюсь вопросом: п

👍114🔥1🤝1

23 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC244 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Алло, вы про вертикальные лобби слышали? Лобби — это фактически Face ID проекта. Примерка проекта на себя и картинка будущего образа жизни в нём начинаются именно здесь. В прошлом посте мы говорили о правильных и разумных высотах этажа и ритейла, а теперь разберёмся с лобби — а-ля гостиной любого проекта, которая радушно будет принимать или ущербно размещать… Выбор, собственно, останется за вами, дорогие. Масштаб

👍13🔥32

17 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC247 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рынок идет к тому, что туалеты в БЦ скоро могут оказаться очень выгодным решением 😉 😁 Если серьезно, то что вы думаете о продаже переговорных в бизнес-центрах?

🔥3👍1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @maslova_prospaces. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МАСЛОВА PRO Dевелопмент” (@maslova_prospaces), 214 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maslova_prospaces.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.