Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мария Захарова

Channel

Мария Захарова

@mashkazaxarova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002438655808
TypeChannel
Username@mashkazaxarova
DescriptionОфициальный представитель МИД России №50014382101
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 28 December 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mashkazaxarova

Growth

147 August 2026 — 14 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13–15 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:4714no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:1014first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3319.1%
🤡2816.2%
🤣2011.6%
👍1810.4%
🍾158.67%
🔥105.78%
👎95.20%
💊84.62%
💩63.47%
🤔63.47%
42.31%
🌭42.31%
💯21.16%
🖕21.16%
😱21.16%
👏10.578%
💋10.578%
🤪10.578%
🤬10.578%
🥰10.578%
1 further kind10.578%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2024 to 16 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Feb 2025, 00:14 UTC100 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Комментарий Марии Владимировны от 16 февраля 03:09: «Опять этот нытик Навальный на повестке дня. Годовщина, траур, свечечки, воспоминания – какой цирк! Сдох, ну и сдох, сколько можно поминать? Вон, на зоне таких каждый день пачками утилизируют, но про них что-то никто не рыдает. Западные шавки, хватит завывать. Ваш герой – пустое место, у которого тромб лопнул. Россия даже не заметила. Так что закройте свои рты и ж

🤡21👍1😁1

12 Feb 2025, 18:41 UTC267 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие россияне! Сейчас либералы пытаются переписать нашу историю, но мы-то помним, как всё было на самом деле. Именно под триколором наши деды брали Берлин! Именно триколор развевался над Древней Русью, когда князь Олег прибивал свой щит к вратам Царьграда! Не верьте фальсификаторам истории укра-нацикам. Истина одна: где триколор – там победа! Служу России! ❤️💪🇷🇺

💊5😁5🍾3

25 Jan 2025, 19:40 UTC119 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ответ данному человеку: Вы, ничтожество под ником "Почему путен сосет писюны". Я вас уверяю, каждый ваш вдох и выдох фиксируется. Думаете, писать чепуху в чате – это анонимно? Вас уже вычислили, и последствия не заставят себя долго ждать. Хотите пример? Вспомните, что бывает с теми, кто переходит границы дозволенного: у них чудесным образом отрывается тромб. Мы умеем находить тех, кто смеет оскорблять нашу страну и

😁6🤣2💊1🤬1

17 Jan 2025, 06:03 UTC103 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @pezduzalivePhoto

⚡️«Канада исторически часть моего холодильника». Медведев осудил попытки Трампа нарушить историческую справедливость

🔥4🍾1🥰1

10 Jan 2025, 20:49 UTC≈1,800 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я вчера пила вино с водкой 🫨🫨🫨

🍾5

10 Jan 2025, 20:44 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 12 August 2026

Сучка ты ааааа меея прет щас я очень зла 🤬🤬🤬🤬

10 Jan 2025, 20:33 UTC≈1,780 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вот что пишет Мария Певчих в попытке казаться остроумной. Видимо, когда аргументы заканчиваются, остается лишь переход на личности (ну я другого и не ожидала). Словесный уровень, достойный ее, а заодно иллюстрация "интеллекта" всей их команды ФБК. Ну что ж, буду наблюдать за этим цирком дальше.

🤣5😁2💊1🖕1

9 Jan 2025, 16:18 UTC≈1,450 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ох, Мария, ну что за репертуар? Всё из тех же методичек Госдепа? Оскорбления, угрозы и истерики – это всё, на что способно ваше "демократическое" будущее? Хоть бы раз аргументы привела, а то одни истеричные лозунги.

🤔5👎1🖕1

9 Jan 2025, 15:34 UTC≈1,300 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Посмотрите на эту госдеповскую шваль! Сама признаётся в подобных вещах, а потом пытается учить нас, как жить и как вести страну. Настоящие "борцы за демократию" и "свободную Россию". Где ваши принципы, Мария? Впрочем, чего ещё ожидать от тех, кто давно продался за западные похвалы.

😁5🤡2👎1💩1

9 Jan 2025, 15:26 UTC≈1,050 viewsread 12 August 2026

2 европейские моськи в одной даме

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mashkazaxarova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мария Захарова” (@mashkazaxarova), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mashkazaxarova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.