Video, posted without a caption

Channel
Такигава Масаки
@masakitaki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001761208655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @masakitaki |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 9 December 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/masakitaki |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 08:59 | 2 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 3 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
https://t.me/dishygivy
Оу привет, это автор канала, давно мы не разговаривали, правда? Мне жаль что всё так вышло и что долго не было вестей и постов, я возобновляю работу канала и в ближайшие дни, постараюсь отписать новую главу, что бы такого больше не было или вы хотя бы знали где я, я создала лайвканал( мне стыдно) поэтому вот, люблю вас💕
Соглашаться или нет?
- Да91%
- Нет9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
// продолжение // Так девушки проговорили очень долго, пока взгляд Мио не пал на телефон и время на них. - к скольки тебе надо было быть дома что бы за тобой зашёл Такигава? - в 5, стоп а сейчас сколько? Мио неловко показала телефон на котором белым цветом горели цифры 17:03. - о нет, нет, нет, нет, Мио пока и прости, я потом верну деньги за кофе! - кричала девушка вслед выбегая из кафе. Летя со всех ног девушка не с…
// от лица этого канала, хочу поздравить вас всех с Новым годом, спасибо что вы со мной и надеюсь будете продолжать находится рядом, надеюсь в этот день вы будете счастливы, спасибо вам //
Приму полчанине за ответ да, я зайду за тобой в 5, кстати я бы хотел поговорить с тобой о кое чём
Зик довольно милый и заботливый парень, который не заставит тебя скучать. Он будет рад пообщаться с тобой в любое время 🌿
Привет миледи, хотел спросить, всё в силе сегодня?
// продолжение// - что значит на самом деле? он хороший человек, внимательный и классный друг. На эти слова Мио только развела руками. - ты не исправима, но ладно, когда договорились ещё погулять? - вроде как сегодня в 17. Вчера пообещала ему, но ни одного сообщения не поступило, хоть у него и есть мой номер. Может самой написать? - да думаю напишет, сейчас же только час дня и ты ещё не всё мне рассказала, куда ходил…
Зайдя домой и поднявшись к себе, девушка легла на кровать и начала прокручивать, всё что сегодня с ней происходило, непроизвольно, на лице появилась улыбка, и со своими мыслями девушка уснула лёжа на кровати. Завтра суббота, а значит можно отоспаться и делать целых ничего, но вот звенит будильник, девушка сонно берёт в руки телефон. - я что забыла его отключить? Сколько хоть сейчас? Уже 12.. стоп, уже 12! Я проспала!…
//продолжение// - и куда же ты хочешь миледи? - парень улыбнулся и перевёл свой взгляд на Т/и. Девушка немного покраснела. - не называй меня так, это выглядит будто мы пара и я предлагаю сходить к аллее, там сейчас красиво из-за сакуры - тогда я согласен, вы с нами ребят? - парень посмотрел на Макао и Харуми. - я наверно не смогу, мне нужно ещё домой забежать - с этими словами Макао выбежал из кафе. - что это с ним, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @masakitaki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Соглашаться или нет?
- Да91%
- Нет9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что же мы ответим?
- Нет0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2021 to 2 September 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@masakitaki named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Такигава Масаки” (@masakitaki), 2 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masakitaki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.