Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mary Virgin || Персонажи || Сharacters

Channel

Mary Virgin || Персонажи || Сharacters

@maryvirgin_chars

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

249subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001756552042
TypeChannel
Username@maryvirgin_chars
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/maryvirgin_chars

Growth

244249246.56 August 2026 — 245 subscribers6 August 2026 — 244 subscribers7 August 2026 — 244 subscribers13 August 2026 — 249 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 243–250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:07249+5
7 Aug 2026, 02:31244no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:30244-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:38245first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.0%
avg views ÷ 249 subscribers
Avg views / post
152
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total304
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9039.5%
❤‍🔥6729.4%
🔥3414.9%
💋93.95%
🦄83.51%
🤔52.19%
41.75%
👍41.75%
🥱41.75%
🌚10.439%
🍌10.439%
😱10.439%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC100 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Был у меня один альбом любимый, вот страница из него. Надо бы конечно по порядку выложить наверное, но там такие шифры, я пока их не разгадаю не могу себе позволить показать. Хотя на ДА я его выкладывала когда-то. [ENG] I had a favorite album—here’s a page from it. I suppose I should post them in order, but there are some codes in there, and until I figure them out, I can’t bring myself to show them. Although I did

🔥3👍1😱1

16 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC346 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пока не доделала, но надеюсь в скором времени. Это очень смешно, будет здорово сделать серию! ☺️✨🤣 [ENG] I haven't finished it yet, but I hope to soon. It's really funny—it'll be great to make a series out of it! ☺️✨🤣

❤‍🔥13🦄32

2 Jul 2026, 21:14 UTC421 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дружба это Магия!!! ✨🌈 [ENG] Friendship is Magic!!! ✨🌈

7

30 Jun 2026, 17:50 UTC366 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Странный да. Во время засыпания увидела на пару секунд. [ENG] Strange yes. During falling asleep saw for a couple of seconds.

10🔥4

30 Jun 2026, 09:41 UTC301 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Делаю комиссионные параллельно основной работе 🌚 [ENG] I do commission work on the side while holding down my main job 🌚

🔥105🦄3

28 Jun 2026, 16:02 UTC287 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Не помню кстати, чем навеяно настроение у собаки, кажется я читала соседние чаты и уловила настроение людей. Параллельно слушала вебинар Школа человечности, рисунки с ответами на вопросы(в комментариях). Задание было в том чтобы составить утверждение - а потом его опровергнуть. [ENG] By the way, I don't remember what inspired the dog's mood; I think I was reading the neighboring chat rooms and picked up on people'

62🦄1

23 Jun 2026, 16:02 UTC316 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I'm looking for you! Friends, if your native language is not Russian and you speak English, please let me know in the comments on this post. I've been gathering an audience from various resources, and I'm not sure which language to use for my posts. If you're reading this and you're interested in me and my work, please respond in the comments and let me know. Can you tell me which resource you came from, FA, IB, o

8🥱4🔥2

9 Jun 2026, 00:04 UTC410 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я признаю твое превосходство мой Пигмалион! ✨🌝

12

5 Jun 2026, 20:58 UTC412 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Остатки со склада, друзья. Успейте приобрести.

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maryvirgin_chars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 195,641 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mary Virgin || Персонажи || Сharacters” (@maryvirgin_chars), 249 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maryvirgin_chars.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.