Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✨MaryAIC🩵

@maryaicdoesstuff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

320subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001397410046
TypeChannel
Username@maryaicdoesstuff
DescriptionBe kind, I'm stupid 🥺 🧁TAGS🍬 #AICart #AICoc #AICwip #AICsketch #AICanimatic #AICcollab #AICtl #GenshinTD #ArtFightAIC ✨OCs #Jude #Lomar #Maleko #Brie #Kyoko 🍮Link🍭 http://maryaic.carrd.co ---- @maryaic per pvt ✨ @maryAICfolliaposting
Created4 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/maryaicdoesstuff

Growth

3206 Aug 2026, 09:50 — 320 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:00 — 320 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:506 Aug 2026, 22:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 319–321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 22:00320no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:50320first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.7%
avg views ÷ 320 subscribers
Avg views / post
182
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (23 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,087
Reactions total214
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,150
Videos
44
Links
247

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

214 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18184.6%
❤‍🔥209.35%
🌭115.14%
🍓20.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC49 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Aggiunta una mela Say: Apple

13

Signed Mary💠

5 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC94 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ogni tanto faccio qualche studio pure io Ciliegine

26

Signed Mary💠

4 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC295 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ciao a tutti :3 Per celebrare i (quasi, ci eravamo arrivati ieri..) +1.5K follower su IG sto tenendo un giveway :3 Più info al post IG!! ⭐️ https://www.instagram.com/p/DboKNrbAhbl/?igsh=dnA0czJtaWNrMDBo

19❤‍🔥2

Signed Mary💠

1 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC168 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Domanda sfacciata ma.. C'è mica qualcuno che ha qualche codice di Vgen da potermi dare? 👉👈 Edit: RICEVUTO, GRAZIE MILLE🩵🩵🩵

7

Signed Mary💠

28 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC259 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

nel mentre beccatevi questo micro spoiler per una cosa per la Milano Artist Alley

24

Signed Mary💠

28 Jul 2026, 07:12 UTC231 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Per come l'ho scritto sembra che sia un elite di campani, scusatemi, in generale se siete persone interessate a fiere in campania per tenerci aggiornati/dividere tavoli ecc. Scusatemi, l'ultima delle mie intenzioni è fare gatekeep ;v;

5

Signed Mary💠

27 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTC211 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Per gli amichetti standisti merch artist campani, stavo pensando di creare un gruppo per tenerci aggiornati sulle fiere in Campania e sto vedendo un attimo chi è interessato Se volete essere ipoteticamente aggiunti commentate qui o scrivetemi in privato @maryaic :3

14

Signed Mary💠

27 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC209 viewsread 6 August 2026

ovviamente per stile intendo questo lettering! avrebbero una loro coerenza stilistica in base al tema (non con il merlettino e i cuoricini </3)

Signed Mary💠

27 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC203 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

domandina, vi interesserebbero delle pins in questo stile con le pronouns?(he/shim, she/her, they/them ecc)

  1. si, comprerei!65%
  2. no non comprerei/non sono interessatx35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Mary💠

27 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC95 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @WESTAYSERIOUS

Ciao scusate ma questo è importante 🚫 DIVIETO DI CACCIA 🚫 📢 È UFFICIALE: I DUE REFERENDUM SONO STATI PUBBLICATI IN GAZZETTA UFFICIALE! 📢 Il nostro percorso legale è iniziato nel modo migliore. Ora che i quesiti sono stati pubblicati ufficialmente, la piattaforma dello Stato è attiva e tocca a tutti noi fare la nostra parte. Non serve cercare un banchetto in piazza: puoi firmare direttamente dal tuo smartphone o PC u

3

Signed Mary💠

25 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC161 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ultimo disegno che feci sulla tavoletta senza schermo, è molto vecchio ma è anche l'ultima volta che le ho dedicato un disegno per bene!!

15🍓2

Signed Mary💠

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @maryaicdoesstuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

domandina, vi interesserebbero delle pins in questo stile con le pronouns?(he/shim, she/her, they/them ecc)

  1. si, comprerei!65%
  2. no non comprerei/non sono interessatx35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 136,825 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨MaryAIC🩵” (@maryaicdoesstuff), 320 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maryaicdoesstuff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.