3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 314–315 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 16:14
315
+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:17
314
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:28
314
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
73.6%
avg views ÷ 315 subscribers
Avg views / post
232
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
4,638
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#ANONS
#Muslim_podcast
#13_son
📱🗣BIROVNING HАQQI JАNNАTDАN TOʼSАDIMI?⚡️
⚡️ Podcastning bu sonida: Haqqul abd nima? Muflis kim?
🗣 Birovning haqqi haqida Qurʼoni karim bizni qanday ogohlantiradi? Аldov bilan topilgan pul halol bo'lishi ham mumkinmi? Savdoda xaridorni aldashning hukmi qanday?
⚡️ Birovning intellektual mulki - kitoblari, kurslari, video yoki dasturlarini ruxsatsiz sotish yoki tarqatish ham uning haqq…
#Muslim_podcast_7_son
📱🗣SUN’IY INTELLEKT VA DINIY SAVOL: NAF QAYERDA, XAVF QAYERDA? ⚡️
🎙 Ekspert: Saidjamol domla Masayitov – Oʼzbekiston musulmonlari idorasi Fatvo markazi katta ilmiy xodimi, islomshunoslik fanlari bo‘yicha falsafa doktori (PhD)
📱 🗣Podkastimizning o‘tgan sonida quyidagi savollarga javob berilgan:
1. Fatvo berish uchun qanday ilmlarni bilish kerak?
2. Hozirgi kundа oʼzini “domlа” qilib koʼrsаtаy…
152-САВОЛ: “Исро” ва “Меърож” воқеасининг қамарий қайси ойда бўлиб ўтгани ҳақида ҳам ҳар хил маълумотлар мавжуд бўлиб, уларнинг ичида “Ражаб” ва “Робиъул аввал” ойлари машҳурдир. Буларнинг қайси бири хақиқатга яқинроқ?
Робиъул аввал ойи56%
Ражаб ойи44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#ВИДЕО
«ЗАКОВАТ ЭГАЛАРИ» ТАҚДИРЛАНДИ
Мустақиллигимизнинг 35 йиллиги арафасида Тошкент шаҳрида фаолият юритаётган имом-хатиблар ва имом ноиблари ўртасида «Заковат» аренасида «Заковат» ўйини ўтказилди.✅
Тадбирни Тошкент шаҳар бош имом-хатиби Абдуқаҳҳор домла Юнусов очиб бердилар.
Тошкент шаҳрининг 12 та туманидан диний соҳа ходимлари 12 та жамоа бўлиб иштирок этди.
✅ Улашинг | @MuslimShosh
#Muslim_podcast_6_son
📱🗣АVVALDA BOʼLMAGAN HAR QANDAY ISH BIDʼATMI❓⚡️
📢 Barchasi ushbu koʼrsatuvda aniq dalillar va salaf ulamolarning soʼzlari bilan bayon etilgan.
🎙 Ekspert: Yorqinjon domla Jumaboev – Oʼzbekiston musulmonlari idorasi Fatvo markazi ilmiy xodimi
📱 🗣Podkastimizning o‘tgan sonida quyidagi savollarga javob berilgan:
1. Аvvalda boʼlmagan har qanday ish bidʼatmi?
2. Bid’at o'zi nima?
3. Bid'atni qanda…
#Видео
🕌 ДЎСТЛАРГА ҒОЙИБОНА
ДУОЛАР ҚИЛАЙЛИК!
🕌
✅ Фаришта "Омин" деб турадиган бир дуо бор. Бу қайси дуо?
✅ Қайси дуога қўл очилганда "Сенга ҳам шундай бўлсин!" дейилади?
Тошкент шаҳар бош имом-хатиби
Абдуқаҳҳор домла Юнусовнинг жума суҳбатларидан
🤲🟢 Дўстларга ҳам эслатма бўлсин!
✅ Улашинг | @MuslimShosh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @marufotauz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
152-САВОЛ: “Исро” ва “Меърож” воқеасининг қамарий қайси ойда бўлиб ўтгани ҳақида ҳам ҳар хил маълумотлар мавжуд бўлиб, уларнинг ичида “Ражаб” ва “Робиъул аввал” ойлари машҳурдир. Буларнинг қайси бири хақиқатга яқинроқ?
Робиъул аввал ойи56%
Ражаб ойи44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
151-САВОЛ: “Исро” ва “Меърож” воқеаси нубуватнинг нечанчи йили содир бўлган?
8 йили31%
10 йили35%
12 йили19%
13 йили15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@marufotauz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@muslimuz named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"Маъруф ота" жоме масжиди” (@marufotauz), 315 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marufotauz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
