Скоро новый год! У кого какие планы? Как думаете, Демешин на байке подьедет к площади?
🤣9🖕1

Channel
@maroder27
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
291subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002126683287 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maroder27 |
| Created | 5 March 2024 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maroder27 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 291 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 291 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
343 reactions across 17 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 58 | 16.9% | |
| 👎 | 40 | 11.7% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 7.87% | |
| 🤣 | 23 | 6.71% | |
| 🖕 | 22 | 6.41% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 6.12% | |
| 🍾 | 17 | 4.96% | |
| 🤡 | 15 | 4.37% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 4.08% | |
| 🤯 | 12 | 3.50% | |
| 💩 | 11 | 3.21% | |
| 🥱 | 11 | 3.21% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 2.04% | |
| 🤮 | 7 | 2.04% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 1.75% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.583% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.583% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.583% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 0.292% | |
| 7 further kinds | 7 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 343reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2024 to 21 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Скоро новый год! У кого какие планы? Как думаете, Демешин на байке подьедет к площади?
🤣9🖕1
Скажите пожалуйста! Как обстоят дела с Музыкальной комедией? Ремонт планируется?
🖕3
Прокатились мы значит по Хабаровскому краю. Посетили Ванино, Заветы Ильча, Советскую Гавань, Комсомольск на Амуре, Амурск и Эльбан. Резюмируем, в Хабаровске самые плохие и разбитые дороги... Вот такая вот столица!!!!
👏13🤔2🤣2👍1🖕1
Чего то мы совсем пропали 😳😒
💯14🖕1🤷♂1
Заверены списки кандидатов в депутаты краевой Думы, выдвинутых избирательными объединениями ЕДИНАЯ РОССИЯ и СПРАВЕДЛИВАЯ РОССИЯ 28 июля 2025 года состоялось заседание Избирательной комиссии Хабаровского края. Членами комиссии принято решение заверить списки кандидатов в депутаты Законодательной Думы Хабаровского края восьмого созыва, выдвинутых отделениями политических партий ЕДИНАЯ РОССИЯ и СПРАВЕДЛИВАЯ РОССИЯ - З…
🤡6👍2🤣2👎1🤨1
Так, а как вы относитесь к работе губернатора Демешина? Если честно не вижу никаких изменений. Ну т.есть не плюсов не минусов. Может вы что подскажите в комментариях? 👍-отлично отношусь к его работе 👎-отрицательно или никак. Давайте проголосуем лайками и пообщаемся в комментариях
👎35👍3🖕3🤣2
В скором времени в Хабаровском крае состоятся довыборы на разных уровнях. В правительстве отдано распоряжение максимально сократить количество кандидатов от партии Справедливая Россия. Точнее сказать так "Необходимо доебаться до каждой запятой". Пристальногл внимания к остальным партиям оказываться не будет. Ждем, наблюдаем. Интересно кто кого и куда выдвинет.
🌚7😁6🤣2👍1🖕1🤡1
Мы не активны, но это пока 😉
😁6🫡2💩1🖕1🤩1🤮1
Творчество Хабаровчан на высшем уровне
🔥6🤡6👍2🖕2🏆1🥰1
Так, а если серьезно! Скоро 9 мая и вся страна будет праздновать день Победы!!! Депутат Законодательной думы Хабаровского края Сергей Безденежных предложил увеличить выплаты для "Детей войны" до 5000 рублей. Деньги можно взять из вливаемых бюджетных в наш хокейный клуб "Амур". Составляет он 1600000000. Посчитайте нолики😊. В обшем 1,6 миллиарда рублей. На секундочку, в команде присутствуют граждане США и Канады. Де…
🤯12💩7🔥6🖕2🗿1🤣1
Здравствуйте А все заметили что дороги растаяли? И почему в правительственных и депутатских чатах, как будто все пи..дато?
😁15🖕2🤬1
Новость о задержании депутата Хабаровской городской думы Сергея Тижина смакуют все кому не лень. Наебывал депутат людей пачками. Более того совместно с ним задержали порядка 20 человек. Большинство из задержанных члены Молодой гвардии. То есть Уебок создал на базе молодежной организации Единой России целую группу мошенников. Куда смотрели старшие товарищи? Фотографировались с бабушками и пиздели с телевизора. По …
🔥17🖕2🤣2❤1🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maroder27. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выборы прошли, ЕР на первых местах. Вопрос, стоит ли нам продолжать свою деятельность? Освещать работу чиновников и депутатов!?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2024 to 21 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 916,295 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мародеры Региона” (@maroder27), 291 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maroder27.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.