Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Маркировка рекламы на понятном | МаркПост

Channel

Маркировка рекламы на понятном | МаркПост

@markpost

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

311subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002069208762
TypeChannel
Username@markpost
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/markpost

Growth

311312311.57 August 2026 — 312 subscribers8 August 2026 — 312 subscribers22 August 2026 — 311 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 311–312 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 11:22311-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:45312no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:00312first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 06m
Average length
22m 18s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4940.8%
🔥3529.2%
1411.7%
😢43.33%
👏32.50%
💯32.50%
😭32.50%
🆒21.67%
👎21.67%
❤‍🔥10.833%
💩10.833%
😱10.833%
🤡10.833%
🤯10.833%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2024 to 19 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Nov 2025, 13:59 UTC311 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔴🔴🔴 Яндекс ОРД теперь требует скрины ИНН и паспорта для ИП и СЗ, для юр лиц решение о назначении на должность ген директора, а после предоставления на 1-2 дня замораживает работу ОРД пока проводят проверку этих документов. Рекомендуем внести данные в ОРД, чтоб не ожидать верификации, когда вам потребуется маркировка. Касается тех, кто ранее маркировал через Яндекс и Маркпост, для новых пользователей яндекс запрашив

👍4

8 Jul 2025, 07:24 UTC686 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🟡 Кто-то мог бы подумать, что Маркпост "замолчал", а значит — не работает. Но всё наоборот. 📡 Мы просто всё автоматизировали. Раньше было, о чём писать: запуск, обновления, доработки, уроки по маркировке. А теперь… всё просто работает. Без танцев с бубнами. Все вопросы от пользователей закрыты в этих видео. Всё прозрачно и стабильно. ⚙️ Сложную систему маркировки мы превратили в понятный и удобный сервис. Новички

🔥9👍3💯32

17 Jan 2025, 08:11 UTC≈1,170 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

‼️ С 13 января 2025 года необходимо использовать коды ККТУ вместо ОКВЭД при оформлении новых рекламных креативов. 🔍 Как найти свой код? Просто введите ключевые слова, описывающие ваш товар или услугу в поиске по тексту при создании креатива. Система предложит подходящие категории ККТУ.

👍7😭31💩1🤡1🤯1😱1

30 Oct 2024, 08:11 UTC≈1,320 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

😨😱 Плавно начинают штрафовать за отсутствие маркировки, вот факты: 1. Общая сумма штрафов за нарушение требований о маркировке интернет-рекламы в 2024 году превысила 21 млн рублей. 2. За распространение рекламы без надлежащей маркировки: - Зафиксировано более 200 нарушений - Сумма штрафов составила 14,4 млн рублей 3. За предоставление неполных или недостоверных данных при маркировке рекламы: - Вынесено 131

😢4👍21👎1

28 Oct 2024, 09:32 UTC≈1,200 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️😀🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ МаркПост - это автоматизация маркировки рекламы на 80% и при этом это самый простой способ с нуля разобраться с маркировкой рекламы. ▪️ Маркировка рекламы за 2минуты ▪️ Полный гайд о маркировке рекламы ▪️ Мастер класс по маркировке рекламы ▪️ Информация для закупщиков ▪️ Как маркировать рекламу в видео ▪️ Создание договоров ▪️ Реферальная программа ▪️ Как отчитаться за рекл

🔥3👍1

21 Oct 2024, 08:56 UTC855 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

‼️ Для маркировки необходимо дать разрешение на использование API через Яндекс ОРД, если не проходит маркировка. Делается просто, инструкция в прикрепленном видео☝️

👍4

18 Oct 2024, 07:09 UTC772 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎞 Полный гайд о маркировке рекламы перезалили на суверенный Рутуб. На Ютубе тоже есть) Бот для маркировки @MarkirovkaPostov_bot 🔙 .

🔥5👍2👎1

13 Sept 2024, 08:16 UTC674 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤖 МаркПост теперь с GPT-ассистентом для маркировки рекламы! 🔥 Мы сделали маркировку рекламы ещё проще. Встречайте GPT-ассистента, который отвечает на вопросы и помогает разобраться в маркировке. 💡 Как это работает? Я долго обучал нейросеть, чтобы она могла максимально облегчить вам жизнь. Даже пришлось написать промт для промтов, чтобы сам процесс настройки шёл быстрее. Теперь GPT-ассистент в курсе всех нюансов мар

🔥3🆒2👍1

31 Jul 2024, 14:37 UTC639 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💪 МаркПост используют топы инфобиза

👍3🔥1

12 Jul 2024, 11:08 UTC730 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎞 Поступает много вопросов по поводу маркировки рекламы закупщиками и что за бесплатный тариф для них. В этом видео объяснил как управлять аккаунтами клиентов и почему для закупщика бесплатно Видео на Ютуб и на Рутуб

👍6🔥3

2 Jul 2024, 13:58 UTC599 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Отзывы в комментариях

8🔥4👏3

17 Jun 2024, 07:09 UTC540 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎞 Как маркировать рекламу на Ютуб, видео тут

🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @markpost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 746,593 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Маркировка рекламы на понятном | МаркПост” (@markpost), 311 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markpost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.