Markon Review Express pinned a photo

Channel
Markon Review Express
@markonreview_express
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
858subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001850273019 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @markonreview_express |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/markonreview_express |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 858 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 860 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:40 | 860 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 859 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 32.7%
- avg views ÷ 858 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 281
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.713%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 April 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 842 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 38.9% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 36.1% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 8.33% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 2.78% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📰 2026 年 7 月新游盘点 🔹 节奏天国 奇迹之星 / リズム天国 ミラクルスターズ 🔹 斯普拉遁 涂击队 / スプラトゥーン レイダース 🔹 刺客信条:黑旗 记忆重置 / Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Resynced 🔹 桌面探索者 / Desktop Explorer 🔹 光环:战役进化 / Halo: Campaign Evolved 🔹 都托邦 / D-topia 🔹 Database Detective: Minor Crimes Division 🔗 来源:Markon Review 📮 频道:@markonreview_express 💬 投稿 · 🌐 去网站 · ☕️ 请杯咖啡
❤2
🎙 前 PlayStation 负责人 Shawn Layden:游戏业困在“越做越大”的坏习惯里 近期,Eurogamer 采访了曾为索尼工作 32 年、曾执掌 PlayStation 全球第一方工作室的 Shawn Layden,后者近年反复强调一个判断——3A 游戏的开发已难以为继。按 Layden 的测算,开发成本几乎每一世代翻倍:同样是做 3A 大作,PS1 时代 100 万美元能做,到 PS4 时代不算营销也得 1.5 亿美元,照此推算,PS5 的大作成本终将逼近 3~4 亿美元,“这根本不可持续”。 Eurogamer 援引多个来源的信息指出,Layden 的看法与近年业界披露的成本趋势吻合:彭博社记者 Jason Schreier 称,如今 3A 预算普遍在“3 亿美元以上”,彭博社的另一篇报道也梳理过,《秘境探险 2:盗亦有道》(Uncharted 2: Among Thieves)2009 年在 PS3 …
👍2😢1
📰 前迪士尼 CEO 坦言,已记不清当年为什么批准《王国之心》 据 Game File 报道,前迪士尼原 CEO Michael Eisner 近日在一场活动中承认,自己已经记不清当年为何会批准《王国之心》(Kingdom Hearts)这个与 Square Enix 合作的跨界企划。 Eisner 近日在纽约出席了一场活动、为其投资的新工作室站台 Game File 记者 Stephen Totilo 上前询问、对方是否记得放行《王国之心》项目的事情,Eisner 起初回答“不记得”,在 Totilo 帮助回忆了对方当年的工作、以及迪士尼与《最终幻想》(Final Fantasy)角色同台的设定后,Eisner 终于想起来了有这回事、但已忘记了具体的决策思路。 Totilo 在文中还引用了日本媒体 Otoco 的一篇专访,内容囊括了世嘉 COO 内海州史的回忆。内海当年正供职于迪士尼日本分部,被派去向 Eisner 汇报…
👏1
📊 GamesIndustry:索尼 2028 年起停产新游戏光盘,Xbox 据报道也将取消光驱 索尼近日宣布,自 2028 年 1 月起不再为 PS 主机上发行的新游戏生产实体光盘,新作将仅通过 PlayStation Store 及零售渠道以数字版发售(已发行或已确定有光盘版的游戏不受影响),索尼称此为“顺应消费者偏好与整个娱乐行业趋势”的自然选择。据 GamesIndustry 援引自 Game File 的报道,索尼披露的数据显示,过去一个财年 PS4/PS5 上近 4/5 的完整游戏购买是数字版;GamesIndustry 认为此举暗示索尼不会为下一代主机配备光驱。 无独有偶,另据 Windows Central 的报道,微软下一代主机(代号 Project Helix)同样可能取消光驱;GamesIndustry 还引用 The Verge 的消息称,Xbox 正测试一项允许玩家将手中实体游戏“数字化”的功能,以…
😁3🤮1
Markon Review Express pinned a photo
📊 Aftermath:三星、美光、SK 海力士被控合谋操纵 DRAM 内存价格——而这并非它们第一次接受此类指控 近日,有消费者对三星(Samsung)、美光(Micron)与 SK 海力士(SK Hynix)提起诉讼,指控这三家掌控全球 91% DRAM 内存芯片营收的厂商,自 2022 年起合谋操纵价格——通过削减产量、将产能转向面向 AI 数据中心的高带宽内存(HBM)、停产旧型号内存,人为制造供应短缺以抬高售价。作者认为本文的一大趣味在于,Aftermath 指出“三巨头”并非初犯,并介绍了 2000 年以来三家公司受过的同类处罚、指控。 🔗 来源:Aftermath,作者 Nicole Carpenter 📮 频道:@markonreview_express 💬 投稿 · 🌐 去网站 · ☕️ 请杯咖啡
🤡1
📊 加州众议院通过 AB 1921《保护我们的游戏法案》,要求游戏停服后留可玩方案或退款 加州州议会众议院于 6 月 1 日以 43 票对 16 票通过编号 AB 1921 的《保护我们的游戏法案》(Protect Our Games Act),由圣迭戈州议员 Chris Ward 主推,推动该法案的“Stop Killing Games”(停止杀死游戏)运动组织称此为“游戏保存领域的重要进展”。 AB 1921 法案要求,游戏公司在关服之前提前 60 天通知玩家,并在停服后提供让玩家继续游玩的方案——如离线模式或社区服务器——或者给予退款;法案现已送交州参议院,将于 6 月在委员会辩论,主推该法案的 Ward 呼吁加州的玩家与开发者联系本州参议员表达支持。 “Stop Killing Games”由 YouTube 频道主 Ross Scott 于 2024 年 4 月发起,导火索是育碧关闭了《飙酷车神》(The Cre…
👍11❤2
Markon Review Express pinned a photo
📰 2026 年 5 月新游盘点 🔹 混音青春 / Mixtape 🔹 007 初露锋芒 / 007 First Light 🔹 归零巡礼:亡谍镇魂曲 / ZERO PARADES: For Dead Spies 🔹 极限竞速 地平线 6 / Forza Horizon 6 🔹 耀西与不可思议的图鉴 / ヨッシーとフカシギの図鑑 🔹 咖啡心语 东京 / Coffee Talk Tokyo 🔹 我看人下碟 / Wax Heads 🔗 来源:Markon Review 📮 频道:@markonreview_express 💬 投稿 · 🌐 去网站 · ☕️ 请杯咖啡
Markon Review Express pinned a photo
📰 2026 年 4 月新游盘点 🔹 朋友收集 梦想生活 / トモダチコレクション わくわく生活 🔹 识质存在 / PRAGMATA 🔹 沙罗周期 / Saros 🔹 Fishbowl 🔹 Titanium Court 🔗 来源:Markon Review 📮 频道:@markonreview_express 💬 投稿 · 🌐 去网站 · ☕️ 请杯咖啡
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @markonreview_express. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 63,952 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Markon Review Express” (@markonreview_express), 858 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markonreview_express.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.