Channel
@markokorart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
48subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002101773703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @markokorart |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/markokorart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 48 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 48 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 18 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
82 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 76 | 92.7% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 7.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 January 2026 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ещё как косплеера вы меня не видели! Что по новостям 🤩 Вообще, арты рисуются и творятся, но работа заставляет меня о них вспоминать, когда сил что-то делать нет. Сейчас, касательно артов, я не могу понять, на что я хочу рисковать. Мне легко даётся откровенное и всякое такое, но закончить эти работы и тем более их демонстрация доставляют мне проблемы. Тут либо отдельный канал создавать, либо менять вектор. Всё больше …
❤10🔥4
Участники циркового планшета готовы разглашать результаты ❤️🔥🌟🌟🩶🌟🩶🌟🌟❤️🔥 🥳Я организатор t.me/metalpineapple 😏 t.me/drummdum 😒 t.me/griimzza 😞 t.me/parasitarerorganismus 5️⃣ t.me/markokorart 😟 t.me/AOAOAOAO_otmivka 😕 t.me/kkkiskisiu 🙁 t.me/pastel_dreamss #сломанный_планшет
❤7
поучаствовала с крутыми художниками в "сломанном планшете". все так клево отразили свои идеи)
Вот сижу и бурчу над старыми работами. Что-то рисую с нуля, что-то просто как идея… И эта история тут появилась не просто так. Рассказ, для которого я рисую обложку, пропал из-за всей этой ситуации с доступами в приложениях. Я помню о нём буквально крохи, но точно помню тот образ, который застыл у меня перед глазами, и название. Другое дело, что на своей же обложке я нарисовала какой-то триллер… 😅 А должна была быт…
❤5
участвовала в очередном челенже, вот что мне привиделось из той пикчи что скинули. дала давно уже минувших дней, не показывала так как ждала пока остальные опубликуют.
❤5
провозилось с ней несколько дней... но получилось шикарно. с Весной вас!
❤8🔥2
Как мне лень ее заканчивать... Осталось по факту немножко, фон да тени/блики... Ну и чистка.... Финишная прямая считай, а я на одежде сдулась
❤9
Валентина, с моим персонажем... Так сказать бьёт значит любит... Старалась рисовала, а вайба для влюбленных нет. Значит буду рисовать ещё варианты) 🩷✨
❤9
Артик для одного человека... В феврале хочу попробовать взять заказы. Открою на первое время 4 слота. Там решу. Нарисовала за два часика. Но у меня стойкое ощущение что я нарисовала мем "отдай"
❤4
Сидела я что-то ночью рисовала. На одежде сдулась. Ваши предложения что будет? Рисовала с известной фотографии, Апаснай дамы!
❤5
🤩 не ждали? а я тут. все праздники я работала и вот только недавно выдался вечерок порисовать.
❤14
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @markokorart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,198,685 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@markokorart named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“marko.kor рисует ☀️🌸✨” (@markokorart), 48 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markokorart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.