Bitcoin ✅
❤3

Channel
@marketwolfie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
170subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001298776985 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marketwolfie |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marketwolfie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 170 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 169 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 171 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 171 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 266 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
44 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 72.7% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 22.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.27% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bitcoin ✅
❤3
Risk to Reward tells you how much you win when you're right. It says nothing about whether you'll survive long enough to see it play out. That's why, given the choice, I pick 70% win rate every time. Not because the math is better because I actually get to stay in the game long enough for the math to matte
❤5
Everyone talks about Risk to Reward like it's the secret sauce. "You only need to win 20% of trades if your RR is 1:5." Sounds smart on paper. But here's the real problem: the math can be right, and you can still lose the game. If you win only 30% of the time, you're wrong 7 out of 10 trades. Most people can't handle that. Not because they're weak, but because losing over and over messes with your head. So you st…
❤5
Risk to Reward is Overrated, If someone asked me to Pick between a strategy that has 30% win rate with 1:5 Risk to Reward, and a strategy that has 70% win rate with 1:1 Risk to Reward... I will Pick the Latter.....70% Win rate with 1:1 Risk to Reward..... Here is Why....!
🔥3❤1
Volatility 75 🤩.. Simplicity is Key..
🔥2
Apply this in your next 10 trades , I Guarantee that you will improve your wins... do what I said ,for next 10 days then come give me a Feedback... This is Exactly what I do, That's how I decide whether to take the trades or Not, I don't have to charge you to tell you this, because I want to see everyone win, regardless of your what strategy you are using, or who your mentor is..... Let's WIN👊
❤4
No matter what strategy you are using, This will help you avoid unnecessary Losses.. Focus more on Continuation Trading instead of Reversal.. For example: If your Highest Timeframe is D1, Before you look for a buy setup in Low TF either H1, H4 etc make sure previous daily candle is bullish closed as well. Taking trade in the same direction as your highest TF previous candle increase probability of your trades. I…
❤3
In my 8 years of Trading this is what I have observed.... "So many traders blow accounts trying to catch reversals" , Everyone wants to look like they understand they command the market, they want to catch those High risk reward trade at the point of reversal.. They want that perfect screenshot.... I have seen it, I have done it, That is the easiest way to self sabotage.
❤2
FOMC💪
Vix 50🥳
❤3
Vix 75 Flying 👊🔥📈
❤2
Volatility 75
❤3👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @marketwolfie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MARKET WOLF COMMUNITY” (@marketwolfie), 170 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marketwolfie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.