Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Маркетинг глазами Льва

Channel

Маркетинг глазами Льва

@marketinglew

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

799subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001575058305
TypeChannel
Username@marketinglew
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/marketinglew

Growth

7998018007 August 2026 — 801 subscribers7 August 2026 — 801 subscribers14 August 2026 — 799 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 799–801 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:17799-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:17801no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:55801first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.14%
avg views ÷ 799 subscribers
Avg views / post
65.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held16 (13 April 202620 July 2026)
Views total65
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2040.8%
👏1122.4%
😁612.2%
🥴510.2%
👌48.16%
🙏24.08%
👍12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC65 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, форма заполняется за 5 минут, жду от вас помощи 🤝 Результаты исследования пойдут в крупный маркетинговый журнал - https://forms.gle/Cf8uwfXQVXxTR9AU8

👌2

23 Jun 2026, 12:37 UTC142 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌 Кстати, если соскучились по полезному контенту, то крайне рекомендую свою подборку из СМИ: ➡️ Куда переносить рекламу в 2026 году? ➡️ Доля нативной рекламы в социальных сетях достигла 50% ➡️ Какое лучшее время для показа рекламы в России ➡️ Нативная реклама vs баннерная: что работает на бренд в 2026 году ➡️ Доля MAX в медиапланах бизнеса заметно растет Активно работаю над написанием контента сейчас в крупные

🔥2🥴1

23 Jun 2026, 11:17 UTC114 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Подождал 4 дня прежде чем прокомментировать итоги премии. По началу, признаюсь, меня распирало от злости и досады, ибо ненавижу проигрывать 😐 Однако, когда мы узнали финальные результаты, я в очередной раз вспомнил что честность в бизнесе - редкость. В любом случае, большое спасибо всем вам, кто поддержали нас и помогли показать всему рынку кто мы! Это крайне ценно для меня, обнял каждого из вас!

👏6🥴2

18 Jun 2026, 16:57 UTC167 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😁😆😁 Если вы долго игнорировали мою просьбу и ждали, думали "Потом" или "Не сейчас", то настал момент икс! Остались считанные часы и будет понятно кто ТОП-1 рынка РФ. Я настоятельно прошу, в последний раз, отдайте нам голос за BidFox в номинации "Лучшая биржа нативной рекламы". Поверьте, вы делаете вклад в свое рекламное будушее, ведь любой кризис закончится, а рынок рекламы будет нуждаться в крутых инструментах, а

🔥3🥴1

16 Jun 2026, 08:13 UTC153 viewsread 7 August 2026

Иногда и это тоже - маркетинг 👆🏻

16 Jun 2026, 08:13 UTC126 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bidfox_newsVideo

Треки от BidFox? Для тех кто не знал, наш маскот - Фокси, не только делает крутую автоматизацию рекламы, но и еще записывает качевые треки 🔥 Делаем полную версию на Яндекс Музыку? 😏

🔥1

15 Jun 2026, 11:08 UTC137 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ребята, все еще очень актуальна ваша помощь!

👍1

2 Jun 2026, 16:44 UTC203 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну, теперь все серьезно)

🔥6🥴1

18 May 2026, 11:04 UTC268 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ребята, полтора года моей работы привели к тому, что нас номинировали на «Лучшую биржу для нативного продвижения» 🥇 Видимо все таки что-то да умею) Очень нужна ваша поддержка, зайдите на сайт: https://cpc.forum/awards2026 И проголосуйте за BidFox, для меня это будет крайне приятно, получить от вас такую обратную связь!)

👏5🔥3👌2🙏2

13 May 2026, 12:53 UTC200 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Где сейчас чаще отливаете рекламу?

  1. Telegram31%
  2. ВКонтакте19%
  3. Одноклассники3%
  4. MAX9%
  5. Яндекс. Директ28%
  6. Используем SEO трафик13%
  7. Другое28%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @marketinglew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 May 2026, 12:53 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Где сейчас чаще отливаете рекламу?

  1. Telegram31%
  2. ВКонтакте19%
  3. Одноклассники3%
  4. MAX9%
  5. Яндекс. Директ28%
  6. Используем SEO трафик13%
  7. Другое28%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Apr 2026, 06:59 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

Как будто охваты упали... По какому поводу?

  1. Редко пишешь17%
  2. Теряется твой канал в ленте21%
  3. В целом стал реже заходить в ТГ33%
  4. Не интересно4%
  5. Как смотрел, так и смотрю!38%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Маркетинг глазами Льва” (@marketinglew), 799 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marketinglew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.