Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рынок пластинок

Channel

Рынок пластинок

@market_plast

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

323subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003304739287
TypeChannel
Username@market_plast
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/market_plast

Growth

322323322.57 August 2026 — 322 subscribers8 August 2026 — 322 subscribers15 August 2026 — 323 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 322–323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:24323+1
8 Aug 2026, 07:30322no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:33322first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
87.2%
avg views ÷ 323 subscribers
Avg views / post
282
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,661
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2728.1%
😁2324.0%
👍1313.5%
66.25%
👌55.21%
👏55.21%
👀44.17%
🤯33.13%
🤷‍♀33.13%
22.08%
🤔22.08%
🏆11.04%
💯11.04%
🙏11.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Достало. В следующей версии пользовательского соглашения будет запрет на передачу в переписке никнеймов в мессенджерах.

🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC218 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вниманию продавцов ДМ, кто использует интеграцию с ТК! Вот такое сообщение от Яндекс Доставки.

4 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC249 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Про Авито доставку. Я коллекционирую аудиокассеты и периодически пополняю коллекцию. Сегодня на Авито набрёл на продавца, у которого неплохой ассортимент. Дай, думаю, куплю несколько вариантов, да по 2 штуки. В нормальной ситуации это делается просто - накидал в корзину, проставил количество. Но у данного продавца доставка не подключена. Попросил включить - получил отказ. Я как представил, что придется писать в личк

👏5🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC234 viewsread 8 August 2026

О личных продажах в июле. Всё грустно, уже 10 дней нет заказов ни на ДМ, ни на Авито. Аккаунт на Мешке вообще ушёл в отключку, последние 3 месяца кроме любителей предметной фотографии никто не обращается. Как у вас дела на других площадках?

2 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC232 viewsread 8 August 2026

Интересно мнение аудитории - как выдумаете, поменяют ли рынок e-commerce в России события, которые происходят сейчас с Wildberries? Выживет ли компания? Напишите своё мнение в комментах.

1 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC278 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ровно год, как запустили оплату через сайт. Итоги работы сайта за июль 2026 года. +28% по количеству заказов +34% по деньгам. К июлю 2025 года. В абсолютных цифрах пока ещё мелочь, но будем надеяться, что это начало экспоненты 😊

🔥7👍3👌2

29 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC341 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Теперь я видел всё... Больше удивить меня нечем.

👀4🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC355 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Товарищи продавцы, огромная к вам просьба! Не выводите деньги с сайта, пока покуаптель не получит заказ и не подтвердит, что всё в порядке! Если вы вывели деньги, то в случае проблем вам придётся возвращать деньги покупателю напрямую. В этом случае уплаченные комиссии возвращены вам не будут. Если же вы отменяете оплаченный заказ на сайте, то вся сумма автоматически вернётся покупателю.

👌32

28 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC296 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Переключили интеграцию с ТК для юрлиц на схему для физлиц. Теперь все будут отправлять по нашему договору. Подключение и поддержка своего договора с ТК для каждого юрлица оказалось процедурой хлопотной и сложной. И постоянно глючащей. Короче, процесс унифицировали.

🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC286 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чего только не бывает на рынке. Сегодня зарегистрировалась покупательница и с порога сделала несколько заказов на аудиокассеты. Тысяч на 50 рублей примерно.

🔥11🏆1

24 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC367 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Несмотря на то, что в опросе по видам регистрации лидируют Госуслуги, я решил внедрять Сбер ID. По собранной информации интеграция с Госуслугами - процесс сложный, длительный и дорогой. Учитывая негативный опыт с Почтой России, которые уже почти год! не могут организовать нам интеграцию, наступать второй раз на грабли я не желаю. К моему удивлению и радости, команда Сбера, которая занимается интеграцией со Сбер ID со

👍7

23 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC313 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Один из продавцов получил деньги за два заказа, вывел их и перестал выходить на связь с покупателями. Хотя сайт посещал после этого. Т.е. проблема не в болезни и прочем форс-мажоре. Покупатели пожаловались в поддержку. Мы связаться с продавцом не смогли. Трубку не берёт, на имейл не отвечает. При этом у него несколько десятков положительных отзывов. Заблокировали, покупателям порекомендовали обратиться в правоохранит

🤔2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @market_plast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 392,739 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рынок пластинок” (@market_plast), 323 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/market_plast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.