Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 93 days, net +816. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,907–33,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 00:05
33,847
+1
6 Nov 2026, 20:01
33,846
-1
5 Nov 2026, 20:48
33,847
+9
4 Nov 2026, 20:46
33,838
-16
3 Nov 2026, 21:01
33,854
+5
2 Nov 2026, 19:58
33,849
-7
1 Nov 2026, 21:39
33,856
+4
1 Nov 2026, 00:17
33,852
+9
31 Oct 2026, 03:21
33,843
+4
30 Oct 2026, 02:48
33,839
+7
29 Oct 2026, 04:49
33,832
-4
28 Oct 2026, 02:51
33,836
-6
27 Oct 2026, 03:30
33,842
+12
26 Oct 2026, 01:17
33,830
-7
24 Oct 2026, 22:26
33,837
+11
23 Oct 2026, 23:49
33,826
+7
23 Oct 2026, 01:27
33,819
+26
21 Oct 2026, 21:36
33,793
+9
20 Oct 2026, 16:39
33,784
+11
19 Oct 2026, 14:04
33,773
first reading
Engagement
431 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.22%
avg views ÷ 33,847 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,780
130 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 431 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
431 (3 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
361,690
Reactions total
31,612
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 18:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,030
Videos
≈3,800
Links
≈1,330
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 34m
Average length
1m 23s
Measured directly from 199 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
94,680 reactions across 428 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50,243
53.1%
🙏
24,610
26.0%
🔥
8,915
9.42%
❤🔥
4,261
4.50%
👍
1,079
1.14%
💯
1,051
1.11%
🥰
1,044
1.10%
😍
672
0.71%
😁
602
0.636%
🕊
481
0.508%
👏
399
0.421%
🤣
287
0.303%
🎉
240
0.253%
😭
182
0.192%
😢
110
0.116%
💔
107
0.113%
🤗
66
0.07%
💘
53
0.056%
😨
49
0.052%
😱
34
0.036%
25 further kinds
195
0.206%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 429 of the 431 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94,680 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 431 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 62 of 131 posts held from the last 30 days (47.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
В свое время я очень любила читать Псалмы царя Давида. Недавно посмотрела сериал Дом Давида и словно еще больше ожили эти Псалмы, как Давид взывал к Господу с детства, благодаря его матери.
Рекомендую посмотреть
Ссылка на 1 сезон сериала
https://vkvideo.ru/video-201990721_456239963?t=32m20s
2 сезон
https://vkvideo.ru/video-224560904_456240412
Человек любящий - даёт, хочет давать. Но для того, чтобы давать, давать, не делая получающему больно, нужно уметь давать. Как часто бывает, что мы даём не по любви, настоящей, самоотверженной, щедрой любви, а потому, что, когда мы даём, в нас нарастает чувство своей значительности, своего величия. Нам кажется, что давать – это один из способов утвердить себя, показать себе самому и другим свою значительность. Но полу…
Как часто вы хотите изменить что- то в круге забот и ощущаете в конечном итоге бессилие, обиду, раздражение ,опустошенность…? И насколько серьезно вы заняты наведением в порядка в собственном внутреннем мире, принимая всю полноту ответственности за собственные мысли, чувства, переживания, не перекладывая ни на кого другого ответственность за собственную жизнь?
В человеческих взаимоотношениях прикосновение играет колоссальную роль. Сколько сострадания, любви, нежности можно передать прикосновением руки, не словами и речами, а положив руки на плечи человека..
Антоний Сурожский
Проект
«Путь мужчины»
стартует 15 ноября в формате онлайн-обучения.
Благодаря учителям и наставникам этого проекта, у каждого участника появляется уникальная возможность:
- Глубже понять, в чём смысл жизни.
- Осознать, для чего ты проходишь свой путь мужчины.
- Обрести осмысленность и духовный вектор развития.
🏛 Наставники и учителя курса:
- Александр Хакимов
- Сагара Свами
- Сергей Аваков
- И женский взгляд — Ма…
Низкая самооценка
это— проблема не только людей из малообеспеченных слоев населения, но и «сильных мира сего». Низкая самооценка — не что иное, как недостаток ощущения полноты бытия. Что отличает человека с низкой самооценкой? Он любит сплетничать, потому что это дает быстрое, хотя и дешевое, поверхностное наслаждение. Страсть к сплетням — это верный симптом подобного состояния сознания. Уверенные люди говорят об и…
Вопрос: Как аналитически понять, что человек — это не тело, это душа?
Ответ: Каждые семь лет тело человека полностью меняется за счёт рождения новых клеток и отмирания старых. Тела ребёнка уже давно нет, а человек есть; тела взрослого уже нет, а человек есть; тело старика погибает, и человек продолжит своё существование. «Как человек, снимая старые одежды, надевает новые, так и душа входит в новые материальные тела,…
Для того чтобы научиться честности, нужно разговаривать с самим собой. Нужно вести внутренний диалог со своим сердцем, совестью. Разговаривайте с собой.
Не перед кем оправдываться, некого винить и прославлять — только вы с самим собой. Оставайтесь наедине с собой и размышляйте: «Что я сегодня сделал? Что сказал?»
Вы же чувствуете в сердце удовлетворение или неудовлетворение.
Так постепенно вы станете честными по отн…
❤148🙏73🔥33💯6
Showing the 12 most recent of 431 posts we hold for @marinatargakova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@marinatargakova edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 September 2026
Most recent edit
20 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @marinatargakova as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
❤️🩹 Валяева Ольга ❤️ Исцеляя сердца @olgavalyaeva · 20,391 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 September 2026
Олег Гадецкий - официальный канал @ogadecky · 20,478 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 September 2026
ДРЕВС @drevs108 · 74,365 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Bhakti life с Натальей Савич @Bhaktilife · 27,247 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
Торсунов Олег. Официальный канал @olegtorsunovofficial · 20,498 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 27 September 2026
Лазарев Сергей Николаевич @S_N_Lazarev · 63,376 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
ИМРАМ КРИЙЯ @imram_kriya · 71,310 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Разговоры с Ириной Муромцевой @ira_muromtseva · 57,440 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
SATI ETHNICA @SatiEthnica108 · 37,522 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Сергей Кулаков | Космопсихология @cosmopsychologyonline · 26,049 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
Валерий Синельников. Школа Здоровья и Радости @SinelnikovChanel · 30,275 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
ОШО | Путь внутрь @oshorussian · 22,934 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
Садхгуру @SadhguruRussia · 30,506 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МАРИНА ТАРГАКОВА & Co” (@marinatargakova), 33,847 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marinatargakova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.