Марина Пудовкина I Искусство коммуникации I Продюсирование личного бренда «под ключ» I ex PR директор L’Oreal и Dior в России
Связь в Telegram: @Marina_Communications
http://personal-trend.ru
№ 7789757603
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -236. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,371–23,677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 19:44
23,406
-23
13 Aug 2026, 10:13
23,429
-27
12 Aug 2026, 08:04
23,456
-72
11 Aug 2026, 07:46
23,528
-16
10 Aug 2026, 06:50
23,544
-34
9 Aug 2026, 09:53
23,578
-37
8 Aug 2026, 12:07
23,615
-17
7 Aug 2026, 10:33
23,632
-10
6 Aug 2026, 20:46
23,642
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
46.3%
avg views ÷ 23,406 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,800
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
24 (19 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
260,076
Reactions total
5,633
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,010
Videos
≈219
Links
≈256
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 09s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,633 reactions across 24 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,324
23.5%
👍
1,258
22.3%
🎉
868
15.4%
❤
841
14.9%
🥰
822
14.6%
😁
495
8.79%
👏
18
0.32%
👌
6
0.107%
🙏
1
0.018%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,633reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера открыла для себя джаз заново.
Хотя знакомство с ним началось у меня не вчера: я уже бывала в джаз-барах Петербурга. Но концерт Luty Band с Анастасией Лютовой в Клубе Алексея Козлова оказался каким-то особенно душевным и проникновенным.
Я в восторге от вокала Анастасии и от музыкантов. Каждый инструмент там действительно звучал как отдельная вселенная. И только вчера я впервые по-настоящему почувствовала, наск…
В новом выпуске «Красивые и умные» поговорили с Андреем Шилковым о том, что происходит сегодня с миром люкса и гламура в России.
Хотя слово «гламур» в современной Москве уже, кажется, настолько затерлось, что само нуждается в реабилитации. 🙂
Андрей, как всегда, выразился максимально деликатно. Но если перевести с языка эстетики, мысль примерно такая: люкс уже не тот.
А что думаете вы? Рынок действительно стал друг…
Просто увидела экскурсию на гору Моисея и почему-то решила поехать. Сейчас думаю, что это очень характерно для жизни: иногда самые важные события происходят не потому, что мы их долго планировали, а потому, что в какой-то момент просто сказали себе: «А почему бы и нет?»
На этой горе я попросила Всевышнего помочь мне выйти из моей зоны комфорта. Я уже понимала, что хочу перемен, но мне было страшно сделать первый шаг…
Сегодня ровно год, как я вышла из найма.
Для меня это очень символичная дата, потому что год назад началась, по сути, совершенно новая глава моей жизни. Не то чтобы я в один день стала другим человеком и всё вокруг резко изменилось. Скорее, я наконец позволила себе жить так, как мне давно хотелось, но на что я долго не решалась.
Сразу хочу оговориться: я ни в коем случае не призываю всех увольняться, уходить из кор…
Как начать выбирать себя и свои настоящие ценности?
И можно ли этому вообще научиться?
Мы часто говорим: «Я выбираю себя».
Но на самом деле продолжаем выбирать чужие ожидания, чужое одобрение и страх кого-то разочаровать.
Выбрать себя - не значит делать только то, что хочется.
Это значит перестать предавать себя ради того, чтобы быть удобной для других. Каждый раз, когда вы соглашаетесь на то, чего не хотите, вы п…
https://youtu.be/3nhkoAdrZ2M?is=MIL384vEkLdWi0lO
Дорогие, утверждение, что мы не занимаемся йогой так часто, как нам бы хотелось, больше не актуально 🩵
Я уже давно делаю практику онлайн с Аленой, мне идеально заходит она по вайбу, асанам и картинке.
Этим постом хочу выразить ей свою благодарность и поделиться с вами ссылкой на одну из моих любимых практик. Намасте 🙏🏼
🥰64❤60🔥58🎉42👍35👏2👌1
Signed Marina ❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @marinabeaute. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 776,464 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Личный Тренд” (@marinabeaute), 23,406 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marinabeaute.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
