Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПроСтранства🔥Марина Константиниди

Channel

ПроСтранства🔥Марина Константиниди

@marina_taronum

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

398subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001629483937
TypeChannel
Username@marina_taronum
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/marina_taronum

Growth

3984044017 August 2026 — 403 subscribers8 August 2026 — 403 subscribers16 August 2026 — 404 subscribers24 August 2026 — 401 subscribers31 August 2026 — 399 subscribers8 September 2026 — 398 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 397–405 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:36398-1
31 Aug 2026, 06:03399-2
24 Aug 2026, 06:08401-3
16 Aug 2026, 17:47404+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:47403no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:09403first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

92 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3133.7%
🔥1819.6%
custom 52783438499057756091314.1%
custom 537322112917336208555.43%
❤‍🔥55.43%
custom 537078499795326842533.26%
🎉33.26%
💯33.26%
👌22.17%
👏22.17%
😍22.17%
custom 537099013847622447311.09%
11.09%
🙏11.09%
🤩11.09%
🤯11.09%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 18:12 UTC28 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52783438499057756094custom 537322112917336208541👏1🤩1

22 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC41 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Что в теме отношений вам сейчас особенно актуально?

  1. 🌀 Хожу по кругу и попадаю в одинаковые истории25%
  2. ❓Не знаю пытаться все наладить или уйти25%
  3. 🔎 Хочу найти своего человека, но не знаю как и где25%
  4. ❄️ Вроде все нормально, но не хватает тепла и романтики0%
  5. 🛡 Хочу выстроить нормальные границы и сохранить отношения0%
  6. ❤️ Все гармонично, зашла почитать и вдохновиться50%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Jul 2026, 17:17 UTC33 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Интерактив Какая потребность сейчас наиболее актуальна для вас в сфере отношений? Выбирайте эмодзи и присылайте в комментариях, я пришлю ответ вам в личные сообщения. Выбирайте: 🔥 ☔ 🌿 ✈️

5😍2custom 53707849979532684252

14 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTC44 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

31🔥1🤯1🙏1custom 52783438499057756091

13 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC36 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дело № 256 Почему не все отношения приводят к "И жили они долго и счастливо"? Мы еще в детстве поверили в привычный сказочный сюжет, заканчивающийся свадебным пиром. Да, сначала герои проходят испытания, но хэппи энд гарантирован. А в реальной взрослой жизни вдруг все оказывается не совсем так, а то и совсем не так. А что если цель отношений не результат, а процесс? Версия 1. Классическая психология говорит о том

3👏1💯1🔥1custom 52783438499057756091custom 53709901384762244731custom 53732211291733620851

11 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC43 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Для чего ваши отношения? Вопрос "Для чего мы встретились?" в какой-то момент приходит в голову всем. Кому-то нужен особый смысл, кто-то обнаруживает себя снова и снова в похожих сценариях, кто-то ощущает себя совсем иначе, кто-то мучительно думает сохранять отношения и ну его и еще множество других вариаций. Несколько лет назад модно было искать кармические связи (я не против совершенно, другой вопрос как и для чег

❤‍🔥3custom 527834384990577560921🔥1

8 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC53 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С Днем семьи, любви и верности ❤️ Поздравляю и желаю вам и вашим близким благополучия, тепла и радости! 8 в таронумерологии в зависимости от подхода несет довольно подходящие смыслы. Справедливость - аркан, где все взвешенно и верно отмеряно, сбалансированно. Есть и некоторое хладнокровие, обеспечивающее спокойствие. В семейной жизни такое не помешает. Сила - аркан, наполненный мягкой и одновременно неукротимой э

3🎉3custom 52783438499057756092

24 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC54 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Интерактив с новым оракулом ✨ Пишите в комментариях свой вопрос, не забудьте указать имя (спрашивать можно только для себя). Вопросы принимаются до полуночи Мск.

3🔥2custom 52783438499057756092

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @marina_taronum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTCAnonymous Poll4 voters

Что в теме отношений вам сейчас особенно актуально?

  1. 🌀 Хожу по кругу и попадаю в одинаковые истории25%
  2. ❓Не знаю пытаться все наладить или уйти25%
  3. 🔎 Хочу найти своего человека, но не знаю как и где25%
  4. ❄️ Вроде все нормально, но не хватает тепла и романтики0%
  5. 🛡 Хочу выстроить нормальные границы и сохранить отношения0%
  6. ❤️ Все гармонично, зашла почитать и вдохновиться50%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПроСтранства🔥Марина Константиниди” (@marina_taronum), 398 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marina_taronum.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.