Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мужчины.Подростки. Марина Ипатова

Channel

Мужчины.Подростки. Марина Ипатова

@marina_ipatov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

600subscribers

-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002141510909
TypeChannel
Username@marina_ipatov
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/marina_ipatov

Growth

6006306157 August 2026 — 630 subscribers8 August 2026 — 630 subscribers15 August 2026 — 625 subscribers23 August 2026 — 617 subscribers30 August 2026 — 614 subscribers8 September 2026 — 605 subscribers16 September 2026 — 600 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net -30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 596–635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 15:57600-5
8 Sept 2026, 12:37605-9
30 Aug 2026, 11:35614-3
23 Aug 2026, 02:07617-8
15 Aug 2026, 03:18625-5
8 Aug 2026, 02:50630no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:23630first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 04s
Average length
1m 32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

185 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8445.4%
🔥4222.7%
👍168.65%
💯126.49%
😁52.70%
🤔52.70%
👏42.16%
🙏42.16%
👌21.08%
🤩21.08%
🥰21.08%
10.541%
10.541%
🍾10.541%
👨‍💻10.541%
💊10.541%
😱10.541%
🤣10.541%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC50 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

5 признаков того, что тревога мешает вашим отношениям Иногда человек говорит: «Я просто такой закрытый» или «Мне не очень нужны люди». А что, если за этими словами скрывается тревога? Проверьте себя. Возможно, вы узнаете что-то знакомое. 1. Вы долго прокручиваете разговоры в голове После встречи или переписки вы снова и снова вспоминаете, что сказали. Ищете ошибки, думаете, как нужно было ответить. 2. Вам трудн

💯311👍1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC67 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC66 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC69 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC93 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Как вы относитесь к дружбе во взрослом возрасте?

  1. ❤️ У меня есть близкий друг, и это очень ценно.67%
  2. 🙂 Есть приятели, но близкой дружбы нехватает.25%
  3. 🤔 Сейчас не чувствую потребности в друзьях.8%
  4. 💔 Очень хочу настоящую дружбу, но пока не складывается8%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC143 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кстати, еще у меня есть идея запустить такую группу для подростков.

🔥5👏2👍1💯1

30 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC138 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему мы решили создать терапевтическую группу «Я, Ты и Чувства»? Идея этой группы появилась не случайно. За последние годы я все чаще замечаю одну и ту же проблему. Люди хотят близких отношений, хотят дружить, знакомиться, чувствовать себя частью какого-то круга. Но при этом им становится все сложнее выстраивать живое общение. Мир изменился. Сегодня большая часть общения происходит через экран телефона. Мы переп

5🔥2🙏2

27 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC132 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня у меня был выходной. 🎬 И провела я его... на съемках сериала. Да, дляменя это тоже отдых - сменить привычную роль психолога на атмосферу съемочной площадки, новые знакомства и расширение сознания. И знаете, что я сегодня снова осознала? Моя сильная сторона -это самораскрытие человека рядом со мной. Очень часто уже при первой встрече, буквально за пол часа общения, человек рассказывает мне о себе столько

13🔥5👍4

25 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC140 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дружба во взрослом возрасте? Что думаете об этом? В детстве кажется все так просто, друзья будто появляются сами собой: двор, школа, университет. А потом взрослеем и у каждого свои интересы: работа, семья, заботы, переезды… И иногда оказывается, что рядом так много людей, но не с кем поговорить. Как вы думаете? Нужен ли взрослому человеку друг? Тот, с кем можно быть собой, разделить радость, попросить поддержк

7💯4👍2🤔2👌1

23 Jul 2026, 04:40 UTC173 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

И так, сейчас будет только мое мнение. Оно не претендует на истину и не относится ко всем мужчинам и женщинам. Я абсолютно спокойно отношусь к мужской уязвимости. К чувствам. К слезам. К страхам. К растерянности. К боли. Я легко выдерживаю это в дружбе. В своей работе психолога. И, легко, смогла бы выдерживать это и в семейной жизни. Но есть одно «но». Для меня существует разница между пространством, где мужчина

14🤔3💯2👍1🔥1

22 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC135 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

+1 в копилку дипломов ❤️ Моя любовь к учебе безгранична ❤️

🔥163👏2🤩2🍾1👨‍💻1

20 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC171 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мужчины тоже боятся. Особенно зрелые мужчины, примерно после 35... Есть миф, что взрослому мужчине легко познакомиться с женщиной. На самом деле многие мужчины боятся сделать первый шаг. Но еще сильнее они боятся не отказа. Они боятся отвержения. Потому что отказ легко превратить в мысль: «Со мной что-то не так» или «Она наверное в отношениях» и тд. А после нескольких болезненных отношений появляется другой стра

6💯2🔥2🙏21👌1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @marina_ipatov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTCAnonymous Poll24 voters

Как вы относитесь к дружбе во взрослом возрасте?

  1. ❤️ У меня есть близкий друг, и это очень ценно.67%
  2. 🙂 Есть приятели, но близкой дружбы нехватает.25%
  3. 🤔 Сейчас не чувствую потребности в друзьях.8%
  4. 💔 Очень хочу настоящую дружбу, но пока не складывается8%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мужчины.Подростки. Марина Ипатова” (@marina_ipatov), 600 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marina_ipatov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.