Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Maria

Channel

Maria

@mariatools

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

473subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002653807354
TypeChannel
Username@mariatools
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mariatools

Growth

473480476.57 August 2026 — 480 subscribers8 August 2026 — 480 subscribers15 August 2026 — 477 subscribers22 August 2026 — 473 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 472–481 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 04:17473-4
15 Aug 2026, 20:06477-3
8 Aug 2026, 04:34480no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:41480first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
934.6%
🔥623.1%
😭519.2%
🥰311.5%
👍27.69%
💅13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mariatools. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 March 2026 to 27 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 20:44 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👀 Tired of using P1s that you have to pray and hope will be working? ❗️Presenting Maria P1 🕯 Stable routes, multiple HQ routes added as fallback, always up at work time. 💬 Features - Good Concurrency Limit (could vary) - Low Per/K Price - Good Voice Quality - Only pay for answered calls. 💵Pricing: $750 + $130/K + 3% OR $1250 + $110/K 📌 Note : You will only be paying for calls that have been answered by

19 Jun 2026, 17:38 UTC272 viewsread 8 August 2026

DM ME IF U ARE FROM US AND YOU GOT A US PHYSICAL PHONE AND MOBILE NUMBER! WILL PAY FOR SOME CALL TEST! ( YOU DONT HAVE TO CALL ANYONE, JUST RECEIVE MY CALL ) DM @MariyaCooper ASAP!

11 Jun 2026, 16:31 UTC≈4,930 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ TIRED OF SIP'S THAT GOES DOWN EVERYDAY? ⚠️ Our Sip Hasn't Been Down For 4 Months! 💀 FEATURES : 📊 HIGH CONCURRENT CALLS AND CPS! 📊 BEST VOICE DELIVERY QUALITY 👨‍🔧 CHEAP PRICING ⚠️PRICING - - 500$ access and 0.18$ per minute! 🤗 DM @MariyaCooper For Test Or Further Enquiries! 😍 Providing Tests!

2👍1

26 May 2026, 18:40 UTC839 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

DM ME IF YOU ARE LOOKING FOR SIP FOR - 🐶MANUAL CALL ( 888, GOOGLE PASSING ) - 🌩 IVR ( P1, OTPBOT ) I AM CURRENTLY OFFERING FOR NO ACCESS FEE! LOW PER MIN PRICE! TEST AVAILABLE WITH MM DM @mariyacooper

👍1

22 May 2026, 21:17 UTC802 viewsread 8 August 2026

Dm me if you are interested in owning a crypto -> debit card app/website 🤗 cheap supplier fees, trusted supplier 💌

22 May 2026, 01:39 UTC779 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

bro seriously there's no real callers looking for someone to work with? all I have got yet are SpongeBob sounding guys 😭 dm even if you are not a caller and just got an American accent pls

1

20 May 2026, 13:32 UTC728 viewsread 8 August 2026

callers needed 🤗 dm @mariyacooper - Prior Experience Required - Must be able to go off-script - must be available tdy and tomorrow paying good, already got access to the pc. just need someone get the otp 🖤

12 May 2026, 16:37 UTC442 viewsread 8 August 2026

still got the sip, not just ivr but manual calls too 🤗 dm @mariyacooper price : access fee 250$ and 0.16$ a min!

8 May 2026, 21:35 UTC467 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

got a real irl job 🥀 might leave tg

😭5🔥41🥰1

13 Apr 2026, 21:20 UTC873 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

i got USA ONLY spoofed ivr sip ( used for p1 and automated systems ) price : 0.15/minute 60/60 billing Features : - google 1650 passing - +888 toll free passing Dm @Mariyacooper

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mariatools. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Apr 2026, 16:53 UTCAnonymous Poll51 voters

Are you people still active?

  1. yep35%
  2. nop24%
  3. yea6%
  4. no10%
  5. yeah8%
  6. nope18%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Mar 2026, 10:18 UTCAnonymous Poll25 voters

Ready for the launch of a spoofing mailer? 🤩

  1. Yes 🌟48%
  2. Yeah 🍥12%
  3. Def yeah 🐰8%
  4. Hell yeah 🍥32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 27 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Maria” (@mariatools), 473 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mariatools.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.