Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝓞𝓾𝓻 𝓓𝓲𝓪𝓻𝔂

Channel

𝓞𝓾𝓻 𝓓𝓲𝓪𝓻𝔂

@mariananosashas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003398172914
TypeChannel
Username@mariananosashas
Description𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑦 𝑔𝑖𝑟𝑙𝑠 https://t.me/oneandonlysherie
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 September 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
On Telegramt.me/mariananosashas

Growth

496.510 August 2026 — 4 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8 subscribers810 August 202614 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 35 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 18:238no change
1 Sept 2026, 02:278-1
25 Aug 2026, 16:379+2
18 Aug 2026, 05:527+3
10 Aug 2026, 23:154first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
347.5%
avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held20 (27 August 20265 September 2026)
Views total556
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Sept 2026, 18:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
53
Videos
11
Links
49

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋266.7%
💘133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 09:33 UTC18 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

𝓕𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓪𝓻 https://t.me/Lunabianci 𝒍𝒆𝒕'𝒔 𝒃𝒆 𝒊𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒍 𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚜𝚝. 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚘𝚜. 𝚟𝚒𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎. 𝚏𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚍. 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖: _ᴘɪɴᴋ ʜᴀɪʀ _ɢᴏᴏᴅ sʜᴏᴏᴛᴇʀ _ᴡʜɪᴛᴇ ᴍᴀsᴋ سلین دلیل درستی برای انجام کارهاش داشت. نمیتوانست به کسی بگوید که در یک گروه خلافکاری عضو شده برای اینکه دنبال خانواده‌ واقعیش بگردد چون راه های قانونی تر و جالب تری وجود دارد. اما بین راه های سریع این راه زیادی سلین رو جذب کرد‌. شاید هم صرفا از این راه لذت می‌برد.

5 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 14 September 2026

آهنگ هم 《boite en argent》 از ایندیلا☃️

💋1

5 Sept 2026, 09:26 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 14 September 2026
Photo

𝓕𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓪𝓻 https://t.me/DeathinFog 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐛𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐬? 𝚊 𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕: _ᴅᴀʀᴋ ᴀᴄᴀᴅᴇᴍɪᴀ sᴛʏʟᴇ _ʙʀᴏᴡɴ ʜᴀɪʀ زمانی که لیو همراه دوستش وارد کتابخونه شد نمیتونست درک کنه کتاب ها هم جذابند. اما وقتی دوستش به یک سو رفته و لیو هم مجبور به انتخاب یک راه شد و بعد از چند دقیقه نمی‌دانست کجاست. کتاب ها رو لمس میکرد اما باز نمی‌کرد. و با باز کردن اولی و حس کردن آن داستان متوجه شد که چرا کتاب می‌ت

💋1

5 Sept 2026, 09:19 UTC16 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

𝓕𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓪𝓻 https://t.me/joghbache 𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒂 𝒇𝒆𝒍𝒍 𝒊𝒏 𝒍𝒐𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒂 𝑽𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒏 𝒆𝒓𝒂 𝒘𝒂𝒚? 𝚜𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚐𝚒𝚛𝚕 𝚊𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍. 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍𝚗'𝚝 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘𝚘 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐. 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚜𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚍: _ʙʟᴀᴄᴋ ʜᴀɪʀ _ᴄʜᴏᴄᴏʟᴀᴛᴇ sᴋɪɴ _ᴡʜɪᴛᴇ ᴅʀᴇss اوفلیا بعد از مرگ مادربزرگ عزیزش مجبور شده بود پیش پدرش بیاید و با او زندگی کند. زندگی در یک قلعه بزرگ و انشان های جدید جالب بنظر میرسد‌ و اوفلیا را غرق در ذوق میکرد اما با رسیدنش و قلدری های کودکان اشراف ذوقش

5 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC13 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

𝓕𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓪𝓻 https://t.me/redciggi 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑴𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒂. 𝒘𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒘𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒐𝒏𝒆? 𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚔𝚊 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝙼𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚗𝚢 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜: _ʙʀᴏᴡɴ ʜᴀɪʀ _ɢʟᴀssᴇs _ᴀʟᴡᴀʏs ᴛɪʀᴇᴅ اما دختر تنهایی بود و نداشتن دوستی همه رو ناراحت میکنه. نقاشی کشیدن دیگه کمکش نمی‌کرد. به نقاشی هاش داستان داد و برایشان کمیک کشید‌. دقیقا مثل مانگاهایی که میخوند و زمانی که چشم‌هاش رو اونها رو دید. کرکترهایی که خودش خلق کرده بود‌. دوست هاش. فکر میکر

5 Sept 2026, 09:03 UTC39 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

𝓕𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓪𝓻 https://t.me/PieceOfOceans 𝒘𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒘𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒅𝒐 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒈𝒆𝒕 𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒍? 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚞𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎. 𝚂𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚜𝚝. 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚜𝚊𝚒𝚍 𝙽𝚘𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝚎𝚊𝚔, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚏 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚘?: _ʙʟᴀᴄᴋ ʜᴀɪʀ _ᴅᴀʀᴋ ғᴇᴍɪɴɪɴᴇ ᴇɴᴇʀɢʏ مالاریا زنی دور بود. کسی نمیتوانست به او نزدیک شده و تاثیری بر او بگذارد. اما اگر یکی امتحان کرده و سعی کند به او نزدیک شود، مالاریا متوجه خواهد شد که یک تله است؟ حتی اگر متوجه شده باشد ه

5 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC19 viewsread 14 September 2026
Photo

𝓕𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓪𝓻 𝓖𝓲𝓽𝓲 𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒍 𝒎𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒚𝒐𝒖 𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒄𝒆𝒂𝒏 𝚜𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍. 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚒𝚐 𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚔𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚎 𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚘𝚗: _ʙʟᴀᴄᴋ ʟᴏɴɢ ʜᴀɪʀ _ᴅᴀʀᴋ ʙʟᴜᴇ ᴛᴀɪʟ _ʙʟᴜᴇ ᴇʏᴇs آملیا در میان سنگ هایی که نور را از سرزمین‌شان می‌گرفت زندانی بود. تمام هم نوعانش این را پذیرفته و تلاشی برای رهایی از آن نکردند. اما آملیا در مقاومت با خانواده‌ش به سمت موج ها شنا کرد. نور پیدا کرده و آب دریا را آبی دید و حتی یک جعبه‌ی بزرگ و متحرک چوبی را نیز دید.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mariananosashas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓞𝓾𝓻 𝓓𝓲𝓪𝓻𝔂” (@mariananosashas), 8 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mariananosashas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.