Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мари масштабирует

@mari_mashtabiruet

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,719subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001972968982
TypeChannel
Username@mari_mashtabiruet
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mari_mashtabiruet

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@mari_mashtabiruet/426 · this entry12 Dec 2025, 11:27 UTC@gorod_zapuskov/42612 Dec 2025, 12:18 UTC1.0051 minutes
@mari_mashtabiruet/428 · this entry13 Dec 2025, 10:56 UTC@gorod_zapuskov/42813 Dec 2025, 12:07 UTC1.0070 minutes
@mari_mashtabiruet/429 · this entry13 Dec 2025, 14:37 UTC@gorod_zapuskov/42913 Dec 2025, 15:24 UTC1.0047 minutes
@mari_mashtabiruet/437 · this entry17 Dec 2025, 17:42 UTC@gorod_zapuskov/43617 Dec 2025, 17:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@mari_mashtabiruet/438 · this entry12 Feb 2026, 16:11 UTC@gorod_zapuskov/43712 Feb 2026, 17:47 UTC1.001.6 hours
@mari_mashtabiruet/439 · this entry13 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC@gorod_zapuskov/43813 Feb 2026, 18:17 UTC1.0020 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@gorod_zapuskov16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0024 minutesthis entry (160)
@school_marigalanter16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0018 minutesthis entry (151)
@making_money_with_Mari15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0063 minutes@making_money_with_Mari (105)
@maripro202414 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 minutes@maripro2024 (113)
@kuhnya_zapuskov14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0041 minutesthis entry (140)
@zapusk411 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0062 minutesthis entry (110)
@dom_deneg_mari8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.7 hours@dom_deneg_mari (80)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 30 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 November 2025 to 9 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @zapusk4. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,7195,7275,7236 August 2026 — 5,727 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,727 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,725 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,719 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,718–5,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:435,719-6
9 Aug 2026, 15:165,725-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:365,727no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:035,727first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4386.0%
🔥510.0%
👀12.00%
💔12.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC218 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Продажи второго сезона вебинаров по ИИ открыты! 🥳 Что изменилось в мире нейросетей за последний квартал? Обсудим это на новых эфирах. После этих вебинаров вы начнете использовать ИИ на продвинутом уровне (даже если сейчас знания на нуле) и войдете в 5% самых подкованных пользователей мира. У вас будут самые актуальные способы работы с нейросетями на июль 2026 года. Готовьтесь: скоро знакомые начнут обращаться к вам

11 Mar 2026, 12:54 UTC555 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самый частый вопрос, который я получаю: «Что такое вайбкодинг и как на этом заработать?» Впервые проведу бесплатный онлайн-урок на эту тему 💰 Четверг, 19:00 МСК Деньги на вайбкодинге • Что такое вайбкодинг • Новая формула успеха в 2026 • Как технологии могут поднять твою ценность как специалиста • С чего начать, если хочешь освоить вайбкодинг как профессию 👉 Регистрация бесплатная: vibemoney.labsme.ru

1

5 Mar 2026, 09:12 UTC562 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Продажи на интенсив по вайбкодингу и агентам открыты 🥳 ▪️старт 16 марта ▪️вайбкодинг: полностью по шагам от выбора востребованной идеи до размещения готового рабочего проекта любой сложности (+ контакты разработчиков-синьоров, которых мы отобрали и проверили лично) ▪️агенты: от подключения OpenClaw до полноценной ии-команды ▪️как на этом всем можно зарабатывать Как всегда, сдаю там все свои секреты, наработанные фи

1

4 Mar 2026, 11:15 UTC461 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Проджект, продавец, ассистент, куратор — все ИИ. Как мы живём с этим уже 30 дней. Про — проджект, Лумо — продавец, Ио — личный ассистент, Кью — куратор. Работают круглосуточно, зп не просят)) Кроме на токены, 10-20 тыс руб в мес, что все равно дешевле любого сотрудника на свете. Как мы раньше без них жили — уже не представляем)) В Трэдс пишут: — Не может такого быть! Что, они у вас и команду пинают? Отвечу. Нашу

1

23 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTC443 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в 12:00 мск — второй вебинар «ИИ в бизнесе»🔥 Вы пересмотрите свою профессию, поймете, как перестроить ее под новые реалии и делегируете нейросетям часть своей работы. После вебинара вы уйдете с четким планом, как поставить бизнес на ИИ рельсы 🛤 Ссылки на трансляцию отправлены всем купившим на почту и в WhatsApp. Проверьте папку «Спам», если не нашли. Если купили, но не получили доступ — напишите нашему бот

1

21 Feb 2026, 07:03 UTC382 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в 12:00 мск — первый вебинар «ИИ в жизни» 💕 Ссылки на трансляцию отправлены всем купившим на почту и в WhatsApp. Проверьте папку «Спам», если не нашли. Если купили, но не получили доступ — напишите нашему боту @aivebinar_bot, нажмите 🔑 Мои доступы в меню бота, как показано на скриншоте — он найдет вашу оплату и выдаст все ссылки. Еще не с нами? — Еще можете успеть 👉 webinar.labsme.ru

20 Feb 2026, 14:49 UTC369 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Уже завтра — первый день вебинаров по ИИ 😱💞 Что будет: • 21 февраля — вебинар «ИИ в жизни» • 23 февраля — вебинар «ИИ в бизнесе» После проведения вам будет доступна запись на 1 год. Вы сможете пользоваться, как профи, любой нейросетью (даже с 0) и освоите ИИ на уровне 5% пользователей мира. Если вы давно присматривались к ИИ, но не знали с чего начать — это тот самый момент. ПЕРЕЙТИ НА САЙТ 🩷 НАПИСАТЬ БОТУ 🪲 Лу

1

16 Feb 2026, 15:42 UTC410 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как сэкономить 15+ часов в неделю или ТОП-10 способов использования ИИ в жизни и в бизнесе 1. Написать пост в соцсети сами: 20 мин думать о чем писать, 15 мин пялиться в пустой экран, 10 мин написать черновик, удалить, написать заново, еще 10 мин редактировать, потом показать подруге и переписать с ИИ: 7 мин 2. Планирование семейной поездки сами: 40 мин гуглить «куда поехать с детьми», 30 мин сравнивать отели на тр

1

14 Feb 2026, 07:03 UTC373 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Продажи вебинаров по ИИ открыты 🥳 • 21 февраля, «ИИ в жизни» — 3 990 руб. • 23 февраля, «ИИ в бизнесе» — 5 990 руб. • Комплект из двух — 7 990 руб • На все позиции действует рассрочка 0% на 6 мес через Т-Банк Запись — будет. Срок доступа к ней — 1 год. После вебинаров вы сможете пользоваться как профи любой нейросетью (даже с 0) и освоите ИИ на уровне 5% пользователей мира. — полный обзор лучших моделей, чем поль

1

13 Feb 2026, 17:56 UTC370 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

14 февраля — не только про любовь, но и про роботов 💞 Завтра в 10:00 мск Мари откроет продажи на вебинары по ИИ для жизни и бизнеса. Будете ждать такую валентинку? 😏

2

12 Feb 2026, 16:11 UTC532 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

810 000 000 человек используют ChatGPT, но знали ли вы, что он уже даже не базовый минимум? 😅 На этой неделе я установила ИИ-агента. Это не чат-бот и не сервис для текстов. Это полноценный сотрудник, который сидит в чате и общается с моей командой как живой человек. Пишет сообщения, задает вопросы, напоминает о дедлайнах. Я дала ему задачу: заменить проджект-менеджера в запуске нового продукта. Того самого человека

10👀1🔥1

17 Dec 2025, 17:42 UTC701 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

С какими целями приходят на интенсив по вайбкодингу? Собрали несколько историй участников, которые только вчера пришли в ЛАБС: ▪️Татьяна — режиссер-документалист с 1,6 млн подписчиков на YouTube. Хочет приложение для своего проекта про народы России ▪️Диля — владелица онлайн-школы. Хочет свою CRM для работы с учениками, чтобы уйти с дорогой платформы ▪️Анна — продюсер телеграм-канала Павла Гительмана. Хочет дашборд

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mari_mashtabiruet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 382,072 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мари масштабирует” (@mari_mashtabiruet), 5,719 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mari_mashtabiruet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.