Channel
@margoonco
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
837subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001686213696 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @margoonco |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/margoonco |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 837 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 832 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 832 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 833 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (8 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 93 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
157 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 100 | 63.7% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 33.1% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.91% | |
| custom 5355256745558023304 | 1 | 0.637% | |
| custom 5357334118159883232 | 1 | 0.637% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @margoonco. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Хорошие новости, которыми хочется поделиться. 7 августа комиссия Минздрава рекомендовала включить в перечень ЖНВЛП несколько современных противоопухолевых препаратов. И среди них есть препарат, решения по которому многие пациенты ждали уже давно, трастузумаб дерукстекан (Энхерту). Энхерту сегодня занимает очень серьезное место в лечении HER2-положительного рака молочной железы. Это эффективная современная терапия, …
❤12👍9
Posted without readable text
❤15custom 53552567455580233041custom 53573341181598832321
Posted without readable text
❤8👍3
«Если метастазы попали в лимфоузлы, значит рак уже распространился по всему организму». Это один из самых распространенных мифов, который я слышу от пациентов. И именно поэтому слова «метастазы в лимфатических узлах» часто вызывают гораздо больше страха, чем должны. Лимфатическая система, по сути, является второй сосудистой системой нашего организма. Она собирает лишнюю жидкость из тканей, переносит жиры, всосавшие…
👍10❤2
Можно ли заранее «поймать» устойчивость к гормонотерапии и продлить контроль над болезнью? Еще недавно ответ был: нет. Сегодня, после результатов исследования SERENA-6, ответ становится гораздо более обнадеживающим. При гормонозависимом метастатическом раке молочной железы многие пациентки получают комбинацию ингибитора ароматазы + ингибитора CDK4/6. Такое лечение может эффективно контролировать заболевание нескол…
❤13👍7
Белые ночи в Санкт-Петербурге и один из главных онкологических форумов страны. Впереди несколько дней интересных докладов, новых исследований, встреч с коллегами и профессиональных дискуссий.
❤11👍7🔥3
Один и тот же диагноз — а лечение разное. Почему? Представьте двух людей. У обоих рак лёгкого, одна и та же стадия, похожие снимки. Но одному помогает таблетка, которую он принимает дома, а другому та же таблетка не даст вообще ничего. Разница внутри опухоли. На уровне её генов. Долгое время онкология лечила «по органу»: опухоль груди — так, опухоль кишечника — иначе. 🧬 Сегодня мы всё чаще лечим по молекулярному пор…
👍13
Если онколог предлагает сдать жидкостную биопсию, это не «анализ на всё сразу». Это анализ крови, в котором ищут опухолевую ДНК, циркулирующую в кровотоке. Обычно за таким назначением стоит конкретная задача, и её стоит уточнить у врача. Чаще всего метод нужен в нескольких ситуациях. Материала опухоли не хватает для молекулярного теста — например, биопсия была маленькая. Повторную биопсию делать сложно или опасно из…
❤14
🔬 Креатин против рака: что показало новое исследование UCLA — и почему не стоит бежать в магазин спортпитания (или про очередной громкий заголовок) В журнале iScience вышла работа учёных из UCLA, которая наделала шума в соцсетях. Разберёмся спокойно и по делу. Что нашли. В нашей иммунной защите от опухоли участвуют в том числе дендритные клетки. Оказалось, внутри опухоли этим клеткам отчаянно не хватает энергии. К…
❤10
📍 18–19 июня в Абакане пройдет очный консультативный прием онколога федерального уровня. На консультацию стоит записаться, если: ✔ Недавно установлен онкологический диагноз и требуется второе мнение ✔ Есть вопросы по назначенному лечению или его эффективности ✔ Необходим подбор или коррекция противоопухолевой терапии ✔ Беспокоят побочные эффекты лечения ✔ Требуется медицинский консилиум с привлечением профильных сп…
❤5👍3
«А можно ли мне беременеть после рака?» Один из самых частых вопросов после лечения — и один из тех, что страшно задать вслух. Отвечаю спокойно 👩⚕️ Во многих случаях — да, можно. Сам по себе перенесённый рак не означает запрет на беременность. Но планировать её нужно не самостоятельно, а вместе с онкологом, гинекологом и репродуктологом. Что важно: во время лечения беременеть нельзя, вернувшийся цикл ещё не равен…
❤10
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @margoonco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 922,592 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“О сложном - просто” (@margoonco), 837 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/margoonco.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.