Channel
@marfickclub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002339428400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marfickclub |
| Description | Художник, Фрилансер |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marfickclub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 40 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 40 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
124 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 75 | 60.5% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 18.5% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 9.68% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.42% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 2.42% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 2.42% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.806% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Какой пиратик больше всего понравился?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤7
Мини интерактивчик. Пробую тут поучится каким-то основам. Делаю поэтому вот наброски пиратиков. Какой персонажик больше всего нравится? Сделаю опросик чтоли,а то не разу не пробовала даже сделать)
❤10🔥6🥰5🍓2🕊2
Искала что такого интересного поделать. Все пролистала и вот увидела соты.Прям прекрасно провела время и теперь хочу похвастаться.) 🐝 #арт #традишка #соты
🔥7🥰4❤1
Что-то последние 3 дня какие-то грустные и тоскливые поэтому я отлыниваю. В целом всё-равно стараюсь хоть что-то поделать полезного. Два скетчика вот кобольда и ящерки. Правда последней я так и не придумала костюм как-то. Мысля не пришла.. #скетч #арт #кобольд
❤8🔥1
Ладно ещё похвастаюсь. Позавчера у меня было Днд и пока слушала сидела рисовала под настроение. Персонаж у меня там хоть и розовый кобольд, но думаю какое-то вдохновение словила.Пыталась прикинутся экзотическим розовым гоблином xd. Думаю как-нибудь купить доску и приклеивать на неё прямо может.Хотя вроде холодильник неплохо справляется.Пока не знаю. (P.s Думаю когда-нибудь добавлю больше бликов и теней) #арт #глаз …
❤6❤🔥3
Забыла что из интересного у меня тут и небольшая картина нарисованная. При просмотре Рика и Морти у меня вдруг появилось настроение на лимоны) В моей голове это как ящик мандаринов. Можно сверху в коробочку положить и будет красиво😅. Вообще мне нравится что вышло, но я так её и не повесила никуда. Просто на столе лежит. #арт #холст #лимон #краски
❤7🥰2
Помимо Артиков полноценных покидаю еще скетчиков. В последнее время много разного скопилось помимо русалок просто никак ручки не доходят) #скетч
❤6
А у меня тут немо~ Веселенький джестер/клоун. Нравится как выглядит. Будто прирежет после выступления) #adopt #русалка #адопт #клоун
❤6🤡3
Еле как домучала.. Перепробовала 3 варианта разной раскраски,но никак не получалось ничего. Подруга подсобила очень сильно. При том что сам конек пришел в голову сразу же. #adopt #адопт #русалка
🔥5❤3
Готовлю потихоньку ещё и тему Stitch. Знаю что там совсем другой перевод, но так захотелось нарисовать эту игру слов. Сделала скетч давно мышкой и ту кракозябру залайнила. Недавно вот переделывала чтобы выглядело получше. #line #mermaid #русалка
❤5🔥1
Я работаю работаю! Просто ленюсь и не выкладываю. У меня тут Абракадабра есть. Показывает фокусы со своим верным напарником) #adopt #адопт #русалка
❤5🔥1
Забыла сюда совсем отправить. Будем считать отдыхала в новогодние праздники. Это у нас попытка создать эксцентричного персонажа при этом не переборщить с цветами) Вообще интересно было полистать в пинтересте фотки людей на эту тему. Разноцветное и красочное всё. Правда зачастую с перегибом... У меня поэтому как раз какой-то бабушкин свитер и вышел) #арт #адопт #русалка
❤4🔥2💋1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @marfickclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой пиратик больше всего понравился?
The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 19 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 849,972 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@marfickclub named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Порисульки Марфика” (@marfickclub), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marfickclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.