2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–109 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 07:47
108
no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:32
108
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
107.4%
avg views ÷ 108 subscribers
Avg views / post
116
1 post measured
Reaction rate
19.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
18 (10 October 2025 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
116
Reactions total
23
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
21
Videos
4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
611 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
130
21.3%
custom 5278776353112466339
91
14.9%
custom 5287277270212289513
80
13.1%
custom 5253496961587248573
58
9.49%
custom 5336973804218359554
36
5.89%
custom 5334678401896684515
34
5.56%
💩
32
5.24%
🤡
24
3.93%
🤣
23
3.76%
❤
20
3.27%
custom 5346095232423325973
19
3.11%
💋
18
2.95%
😁
16
2.62%
❤🔥
11
1.80%
👏
4
0.655%
💊
3
0.491%
custom 5278506418712879045
2
0.327%
🌭
2
0.327%
👍
2
0.327%
😭
2
0.327%
4 further kinds
4
0.655%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 611reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И снова быстрая голова какого-то рандомного динозавра.
До конца лета, скорее всего, оффнусь. Остался последний жирный долг, который давно тянется за мной, и хочу уже добить его окончательно.
Так что ближайший месяц - штатный режим.
Зато с сентября снова смогу ебашить оставшиеся заказы, новые арты и всякую упоротую хрень. Надеюсь, уже без постоянного ощущения, что за спиной висит кирпич.
А вот мне стало интересно: чего вам сейчас не хватает в артах? 👀
В последнее время я часто думаю про то, какие работы всплывают в ленте каждый день. Есть тренды, которые сначала были прикольными, но после сотен похожих артов, и уж тем более ии, подобный контент уже приелся. А есть наоборот вещи, которых почему-то до сих пор мало. Я сама сейчас больше двигаюсь в сторону динамики. Хочется делать не просто "персонажик …
Какой гений наставил говна на все мои посты? 🤣👏
Хочу знать героя в лицо.
Реально интересно, кто этот воин, который зашёл в мой тг-канал и устроил полноценный рейд какашками
Дракоша для @DontyDrgn 🐉
Последний простой арт перед тем, как я на пару недель(а может и целый месяц) уйду в арт-шахты добивать один масштабный долг. Не теряйте 👁️
Найден очередной старый набросок моего перса. И это его перерисованная версия. Ориг в коммах. Сейчас 26-й год, а друже апдейтится с задержкой.
Историческая справка: 19-22 гг - моя персональная временная петля. Вижу кривой набросок → обновляю → амнезия → январь → находка → опять обновляю. Мем цикла: "С Новым годом! А села ли ты перерисовывать набросок Ящера?"
В 23 я порвала шаблон и ушла в тину бездействия. К чему э…
1 мая наступило. Вы как там?
Наконец-то ожила после 2х месячного затишья. Была операция, поэтому выпала из всего. Сейчас потихоньку разгребаю что должна и возвращаюсь в ритм. Постараюсь больше не пропадать и дропать остальные арты всем, кому должна.
Для @Nataschkente
Сегодня мне 27. И да, опять без попрошаек репостов, ибо эта тема до сих пор напрягает. Вместо этого - набросок птица и итоги 26го года жизни.
Что было:
- Наконец добила один многострадальный арт. После чего вырубилась на полгода.
- В августе ожила, но не до конца.
- Устроилась на работу, где почти ничего не делаю и получаю сотку.
- Снова сломала нос. Вырастила грибы в ушах.
- Полноценок стало больше, чем раньше (был…
Выбираем следующий упоротый арт по подсказкам¡
Зашифровала каждую идею в набор смайлов. Голосуйте за тайный код, который вас заинтересовал больше всего Важно: трешак будет чередоваться с нормальными работами. Сейчас в работе как раз нормальный арт
🫵🍆😜27%
🤪🪚🎨7%
💸👁️🗨️🧚♂️3%
👑💵🍃2%
🧚♂️🦎🏜️12%
🎬🍑👍12%
🚔🦊🤡5%
🐻❓❓❓15%
💀🍑💍17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mardoom77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбираем следующий упоротый арт по подсказкам¡
Зашифровала каждую идею в набор смайлов. Голосуйте за тайный код, который вас заинтересовал больше всего Важно: трешак будет чередоваться с нормальными работами. Сейчас в работе как раз нормальный арт
🫵🍆😜27%
🤪🪚🎨7%
💸👁️🗨️🧚♂️3%
👑💵🍃2%
🧚♂️🦎🏜️12%
🎬🍑👍12%
🚔🦊🤡5%
🐻❓❓❓15%
💀🍑💍17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 30 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 542,794 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MARDOOM” (@mardoom77), 108 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mardoom77.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
