Channel
@mapcantiere
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
221subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001808078240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mapcantiere |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mapcantiere |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 221 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 220 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 220 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
162 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 54 | 33.3% | |
| 😭 | 22 | 13.6% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 13.0% | |
| 🍾 | 20 | 12.3% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 8.64% | |
| 😨 | 13 | 8.02% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.85% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 11 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏹Новая упаковка карт. Теперь в тубусе лежит не просто свёрнутая карта, а карта в крафтовой бумаге, скреплённая сургучной печатью. На печати — герб Российской империи. И всё это вложено в транспортировочный тубус с крышкой. Также при заказе от 2 карт теперь действует скидка 10%, которая будет расти при увеличении заказа. Жду вас! @viatka_goy
❤🔥7
Новинка! Настенная карта Казанского ханства. С этой карты хочу начать отрисовку различных русских княжеств XII-XV столетий. Несмотря на скудность картографических источников, вышла довольно детализированной и интересной. Показывает даруги, города и ханские посёлки, а также подчинённые казанским ханами народы. Выполнена на дореволюционке. https://t.me/mapcantiere2/69
❤🔥9🤯3
В конце концов я вряд-ли смогу переплюнуть подобную графику. Концепция моих губернских карт в том, что зачастую дореволюционные карты написаны от руки, без чётких границ, с нечитаемыми названиями или просто в плохом качестве. Минималистичный пастельно-зелёныц объект на палетном фоне это красиво. А вот перерисовывать города крайне затруднительно. Здесь такими грубыми колорами красоты не наведёшь. Поэтому города по…
❤🔥5✍1
Почему я вообще решил что города должны быть голубыми типо чё вообще
😁5
Posted without readable text
❤1
На выходных индексация цен 😎
😭7😨1
Свершилось! Я заказал 70 тубусов, и теперь они даже с крышками. Все карты снова доступны к заказу. Теперь буду продавать только через тг, чтобы вы не платили комиссию озону за воздух. Думаю ещё сделать сайт. Для заказа - @viatka_goy Ассорти - @mapcantiere2
🍾8
🫢🫢🫢
❤🔥14
Пробуем возродить мапкантир. Потенциальный поставщик тубусов найден. Изготовление карт займёт до двух недель, собираю заказы до воскресенья (чем больше, тем лучше). @viatka_goy
❤🔥12
Тубусов осталось на 4-5 карт, их рынок резко опустел, старый поставщик пропал..
😭15
Новый завоз на озон: -Малые карты Российской империи -Большие карты Российской империи -Большие карты Российской федерации -Карты Московской губернии -Карты Вятской губернии Также остаётся большая карта СССР. Потихоньку возвращаюсь в работу, скоро завезу туда новых штук.
🍾10
🇷🇺 Российская федерация Размеры: - 96 х 52 см (малый). - 116 х 63 см (средний). +300р - 135 х 73 см (большой). +600р Цена - 1099р Доставка включена в стоимость. @durovhuesos
😨12❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mapcantiere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 503,578 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мапкантіръ | Мапкантир” (@mapcantiere), 221 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mapcantiere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.