2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 268–270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 00:27
269
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:01
269
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 269 subscribers
Avg views / post
59.9
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
17 (21 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,018
Reactions total
34
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
34 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
20
58.8%
👍
6
17.6%
👏
4
11.8%
💔
3
8.82%
🤬
1
2.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اسیدپاشی خشونتی است که از دل یک نظم اجتماعی بیرون میآید؛ نظمی که در آن بدن زن هنوز موضوع کنترل، مالکیت و قضاوت است.مهاجم اسید نمیپاشد تا فقط پوست و گوشت یک انسان را نابود کند؛ او میخواهد یک زن را از جامعه پاک کند. هدف، چهره است، زیرا چهره نشانه حضور است؛ نشانه اینکه یک انسان دیده میشود، سخن میگوید و در فضای عمومی حق زندگی دارد.اسیدپاشی یک پیام دارد: «اگر نتوانم تو را کنترل کنم، تلاش میکنم تو را از دید جامعه حذف…
فیلم اودیسه نولان؛
حماسه ای درباره زمانِ ما
بازآفرینی حماسه یونانی اودیسه توسط نولان در جهان امروز ما بسیار معنادار است. در این نوشته از ویژگی های تکنیکی در ساخت فیلم که به نوبه خود منحصر به فرد هستند عامدانه میگذریم تا نگاهی معنایی به داستان داشته باشیم.
حدود ۳۰۰۰ سال پیش، هومر، شاعر نابینا، داستان اودیسه، یکی از دو حماسۀ بزرگ یونان باستان، را سروده است. ایلیاد دیگر حماسه بزرگ یونان است. این اثر روایتگر تلاش های ق…
از ۲۸ فوریه تا زمان اجرای آتشبس در ۸ آوریل، بمبها و موشکهای امریکا و اسرائیل به طور سرسامآوری ۲۳۰۰۰ بار به ایران اصابت کردند. از آن زمان، امریکا حملات بمب و موشک بیشتری انجام داده است، از جمله حدود ۳۰۰ حمله در یک دوره سه روزه در این ماه. این حملات اهداف نظامی و غیرنظامی - از جمله پلها، بیمارستانها، خانهها، مدارس، مشاغل و موارد دیگر - را هدف قرار دادهاند. حداقل ۳۴۶۸ ایرانی، از جمله هفت نوزاد و حداقل ۳۷۶ کودک ب…
فاشیسم همیشه خود را با چهره مردسالارانه سنتی نشان نمیدهد. بلکه وانمود میکند که میخواهد از "زن سفیدپوست" در برابر "دیگریِ بیگانه" (مهاجران) محافظت کند. با این ترفند، زنان رنگینپوست و مهاجر تحت خشونت دوچندان قرار می گیرند: آنها از یک سو به نام یک آزادی کاذب (ممنوعیتهای پوشش) از حقوق و استقلال خود در فضاهای عمومی محروم میشوند و از سوی دیگر هدف اصلی فقر و حاشیهنشینی و دیگر تبعیض ها قرار میگیرند.
در ایتالیا و مج…
ثانیاً، از جنبه بیولوژیک و دموگرافیک، در ایتالیایِ ملونی و مجارستانِ اوربان، وسواس فکری فاشیسم درباره تئوری توطئه «جایگزینی بزرگ» به سیاستهای فرزندآوری تهاجمی تبدیل شده است. در این منطق فاشیستی، بدن زن سفید نیز به یک ابزار ساده برای تولید دموگرافیک در خدمت «نژاد یا ملت» تبدیل میشود، در حالی که همزمان زنان مهاجر و رنگینپوست با تبعیض، ممنوعیتهای پوشش و فقر ساختاری، از کمترین حقوق انسانی محروم میشوند.
نهایتاً، ف…
در چند روز گذشته جمهوری اعدامی با پربایی چوبه های دار در میدان علیخانی اصفهان این پیام را به جامعه مخابره کرد که به زودی اعدام هایی در ملا عام اجرا خواهد کرد. دیشب نگرانی ها درباره اعدام سه تن از معترضین دی ماه پس از تماس با خانواده های ایشان بالا گرفت و مردم اصفهان برای اعتراض به این انتقام وحشیانه حکومتی به میدان علیخانی رفتند.
فضا از پیش بسیار امنیتی بود اما نه حضور پرشمار نیروهای سرکوب و نه چوبه های دار در ملا عا…
کودکهمسری در سایه قانون طالبان؛ رسمیتبخشی به نقض حقوق کودکان
رقیه ساعی
تصویب «اصولنامه تفریق زوجین» از سوی طالبان و بهرسمیت شناختن رسمی ازدواج کودکان، یکی از نگرانکنندهترین تحولات حقوقی و اجتماعی در افغانستانِ تحت حاکمیت طالبان به شمار میرود. این سند ۳۱ صفحهای که در چارچوب قوانین خانواده تنظیم شده، نهتنها احکام مرتبط با ازدواج افراد نابالغ، فسخ نکاح و حضانت کودکان را تشریح میکند، بلکه در عمل، به کودکهمسری…
❤1🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @maosyangarim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 936,359 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ما عصیانگریم” (@maosyangarim), 269 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maosyangarim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.