Channel
@maomaobook
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004387145486 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maomaobook |
| Description | 看老师在黑板上演算数学是没用的，你必须自己去计算，否则答案只是空谈。 #灵性冲撞 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 9 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maomaobook |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 13 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 13 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 11 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 199 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
被你抽离开来看的那道波浪，它始于宇宙的起源，结束于宇宙的尽头。当你切断各种执着，不再耗费情绪的能量，观点便会扩大，就能看到越来越宽广的运作模式，模式之中还有模式，你个人的模式也卷入其中，不是分离的，不会更伟大，也不会更卑微。从单一浪花退开来，你就会看见潮汐与能量的转换；退得远一些，你就会看见全球洋流的变化与月亮阴晴圆缺的影响，再退得远一点，你会看见行星、太阳与时间的影响等；再往后退，就超越了你的时空概念，此刻你才开始看清那道波浪，开始了解它，开始明白一个活生生的现实：波浪就是你，你就是波浪。 #灵性的自我开战
"与我一起停止日夜的区分，你将拥有所有诗歌的源头。"她坐着凝望我一会儿，我迎接着她的目光。 "我想起来了，"她宁静地说，"那是惠特曼的作品，是你第一本书中引用的第一首诗。" "尼萨迦达塔·马哈拉吉说——" "尼萨格啥？" "印度圣哲。他说'在我的世界里，没有任何事情出错。'这是令人大开眼界的宣言。并非他的世界有何不同，关键在于他，在于他那未被扭曲、未经过滤的观点。他已将自我形成的屏障由'知觉者——知觉的行动——被知觉的对象'这个联合之中移除，这三者因此得以合一，那么，完美就是必然的结果了。" #灵性的自我开战 惠特曼引句出自《草叶集》("Leaves of Grass")中的《自我之歌》("Song of Myself")第2节：原文为"Stop this day and night with me and you shall possess the origin of all poems"。 尼萨迦达塔·马哈拉吉（Sri Ni…
没错，我个人的确不想碰到车祸，也不愿弄得全身是伤，但个人喜好并非考量的因素。我有—个更宏观的喜好，就是一切听凭宇宙的喜好。我不必喜欢或理解它－ 我碰到这点小意外不算什么，这只是宇宙传递讯息的方式，音量恰到好处 #灵性的自我开战
“做自己不想做的事”这种想法对我来说近乎荒谬。如果某件事需要去做，自然就会出现我想去做的时机；如果那个时刻没有来临，事情就不会被完成，也不需要去做。我没有时间表、约定或计划，也没有职责、义务或责任的概念，我不附属于任何组织，和其他人也没有连结。 #灵性的自我开战
过去七年来，我们—直努力打拼，却只够支付信用卡的最低还款金额。 #灵性的自我开战 2026年6月，美国个人储蓄率为2.7%这是当年最新数据，低于5月水平 (Statista) 。另一数据源(YCharts/BEA)同样给出2026年6月2.70% (YCharts) 。 [KNOWN, HIGH] 全年走势持续下滑：1月4.5%→2月3.9%→3月3.6% (Crypto Briefing) ，之后继续降到6月的2.7%。 [KNOWN, HIGH] 历史基准：1959年以来长期均值约8.4%，历史最高点是2020年4月的31.8%（疫情刺激支票所致），历史最低点是2005年7月的1.4%
尽管我们想尽办法把它搞得很复杂，但觉醒的旅程其实是全然单纯的。每当我们陷入混乱、迷惘，觉得心灵脆弱或心智被蒙蔽，脑袋被某些灵性推销术、哲学论辩或当今最红的上师弄得晕头转向时，只要回归单纯就行了。没什么好学习的，没什么好知道的，没什么好练习的，也没有什么是你必须成为的。 #灵性的自我开战
人类成人期与开悟之间的差别是，前者是在梦境状态之中醒来，后者则是从梦境状态醒来并从梦境状态中跳脱。 #灵性的自我开战
对闭着眼睛生活的人来说，恐惧是正常且必然的状态。而所谓的无知，就是认为闭上的眼睛是睁开的，还把想象出来的世界当成实际存在的。 #灵性的自我开战 这段话建立了一个隐含的三级状态： 睁眼看见真相——最少见，也最少被这段话直接描述。 闭眼但知道自己闭着——痛苦、恐惧，但至少诚实，有转向睁眼的可能。 闭眼却以为自己睁着——最危险的无知形态，用想象替代现实，且没有自我察觉的机制，恐惧被虚假的确定感掩盖。
某个社会可能平均比另一个稍微进步一点，但事实上，所有社会仍停留在女孩玩家家酒、男孩忙着虐待小动物的阶段。 #灵性的自我开战 家家酒（play house）——常被用作"模拟社会角色、模拟关系、模拟秩序"的儿童游戏原型，隐喻人类社会的"文明""秩序""关系建构"其实还停留在模拟/扮演层面，不是真实成熟的运作。 虐待小动物——发展心理学和犯罪心理学文献里，常被列为反社会行为/攻击性、支配欲、权力测试在儿童早期的典型表现（也常被引用为日后暴力行为的早期警示信号之一，这点确有实证研究支持，[COMMON]）。这里被用来隐喻人类社会的权力结构、暴力、支配关系，本质上还是这种未升华的原始冲动的放大版。
沟通最大的问题在于，我们误以为它已经发生了。 萧伯纳 #灵性的自我开战
若有人自称知道任何事情，其实正代表他们对唯—的那件事—无所知。 #灵性的自我开战
从表层理解“我思故我在”只需几分钟，但要让它从内而外将你吞噬，可能得花费数年的工夫。 #灵性的自我开战
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maomaobook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 378,034 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“毛毛虫书摘” (@maomaobook), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maomaobook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.